11 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

L(t) = 3

Half life 3 confirmed.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 month ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 month ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but do you just want to solve: (L^2)'' + B(L^2)' + 2g*L = A for L?
If so, it's not very hard and the answer will be : = (A-2) / 2(B+g), where B+g =/= 0 > g=-B.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 month ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hooray for the confusing notation mathematicians have adopted for derivatives, eh? Although things like "L^2" for the function x -> L(x) * L(x) don't exactly help either. (I can't help you, I've never had to solve differential equations -- lucky me.)

I see you've edited your post to clarify things. :-)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

will try to solve it tomorrow

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I've never been so good at differential equations, but maybe you'd want to check Monge's technique. If I recall correctly, this technique is able to solve pretty much anything of low order. Though maybe that was for partial differential equations, can't remember well.

What I can say though is that you can't assume that L->Inf is t->Inf, as your L could be anything. Unless you were given special information about your equation, in general you can't assume that.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 month ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Try this wolframalpha-link:
WolframAlpha
Check if it is the correct ODE. Solution seems to be ok, but not very beautiful. you can get c_1 with your boundary condition. Looks like L->0 for t->inf .
Or do you need the complete path to the solution?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 month ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

maybe this?
L(t)= A/[2(1+B+G)]

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 month ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The answer is 42

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 month ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Try using Laplace transform. It changes differential equations into algebraic formulas and makes it easier to solve.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 month ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Noctis to Wormy, do you read me? Noctis to Wormy, are you there? Please respond!

These things evoke bad memories. My maths is not advanced enough to help you.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 11 years ago by Deleted-7275911.