Browse
Category
DiscussionsUncategorized

SG Contributor Question

Closed
SZShot

So, SG's asking us about the contributor system. Whether they should remove it, and public opinion is that they should keep it. Simply put, KEEP IT. Most of them that voted to remove it probably just want free gifts. Sorry. We're not a government handout- Even me, a simple schoolboy with limited funds can give out games- why the hell can't you? (I work. sowwy.) If you can afford $100 dollars worth of games, you can afford to give away a game or two. If you disagree, by all means, please do. Tell me how removing it actually makes the system better- Go ahead. Please.

Mordekaiser es best. Hue hue hue.

MEXICAN-JAPANESE-ASIAN-SAUDI ARABIAN BLOOD. It's like eating rainbows.

If you're looking for a giveaway, go away. I'm broke. My dog ate my monies.

11 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

5 Comments
madnessnewb

Why do we need another thread?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
SZShot

Don't know. I'm bored. We'll see. I'll close it down soon... It's just too hot here, so im just derping around.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
MaximumBunny

So the entire point of this thread...is that there's a dog out there with money inside of it for whoever finds it first?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
SZShot

Nah... The money's in a pinata. Far Cry 3's in it.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
DonVino

SG statement pretty much made it clear that downvoters and upvoters have about equal "high contributors" and "leechers". Most ppl from my "peers" here are downvoters. So yes...saying that only leechers voting down is wrong. I could also say "only exploiters/abusers want to keep it up"

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 11 years ago by SZShot.