So the entire point of this thread...is that there's a dog out there with money inside of it for whoever finds it first?
Comment has been collapsed.
SG statement pretty much made it clear that downvoters and upvoters have about equal "high contributors" and "leechers". Most ppl from my "peers" here are downvoters. So yes...saying that only leechers voting down is wrong. I could also say "only exploiters/abusers want to keep it up"
Comment has been collapsed.
50 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by entomberr
213 Comments - Last post 48 minutes ago by shandyseggs
8 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by CaligoClarus
328 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by SilentBlood
7 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by BanjoBearLV
30 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by dianrizalni
5 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by CelticBatman
156 Comments - Last post 18 seconds ago by Extraterrestrial
84 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Romaki96
82 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by Peetfighter
66 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by uColdStone
735 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by alexfirehouse
16,559 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MjrPITA
5 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Yorickmeister
So, SG's asking us about the contributor system. Whether they should remove it, and public opinion is that they should keep it. Simply put, KEEP IT. Most of them that voted to remove it probably just want free gifts. Sorry. We're not a government handout- Even me, a simple schoolboy with limited funds can give out games- why the hell can't you? (I work. sowwy.) If you can afford $100 dollars worth of games, you can afford to give away a game or two. If you disagree, by all means, please do. Tell me how removing it actually makes the system better- Go ahead. Please.
Mordekaiser es best. Hue hue hue.
MEXICAN-JAPANESE-ASIAN-SAUDI ARABIAN BLOOD. It's like eating rainbows.
If you're looking for a giveaway, go away. I'm broke. My dog ate my monies.
Comment has been collapsed.