Anyway to counter blacklist fast?

You'd still have to go to the profile of everyone on your whitelist and check it manually. Depending on your whitelist,
that's up to 1000 profiles. In my case, it's still almost 200. I wouldn't call that "easy".

Finally, another leech who understands your desire to make a pointless, utterly petty gesture in response to legitimately getting blacklisted?

Here's a question for the pair of you: why do you have any desire to build up a blacklist of people who cannot enter the barren wasteland that is your list of giveaways? What exactly is the point? Why on earth would anybody care?

It just makes it seem that besides being a leech, you're also vindictive. And delusional, I suppose, if you think a BL from you means anything whatsoever.

To try to irritate them, of course!

That'd be nice, yes.

So what you want is essentially an automatic system thing where when someone blacklists you, the system automatically blacklists them?

It is a recurring idea actually: https://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/yjyJ0/suggestion-make-blacklists-bi-directional

And if someone unblacklists you, you auto-unblacklist them as well?

That would not work well, as you could unblacklist someone, enter their GA-s, and reblacklist. And it would have to track the difference between user-initiated and implied/reflexive blacklists (so you blacklisting and unblacklisting someone would not automatically remove you from their blacklist, if they put you there manually). So at the end it (the unblacklisting part) would be complicated to implement and prone to abuse at the same time.

Have to, no. Disliking them has nothing to do with it.
But I don't subscribe to the idea that someone blocking you but still entering and winning your giveaway is a nice thing.
In my opinion you shouldn't be able to join the giveaways of people you've blacklisted, it seems only fair.

If you don't mind, that's fine for you, I'd just rather not reward someone who randomly blacklisted me.

Finally, i found someone reasonable in this place.
Most of the time, i got no opinion of that person, i may not even know who they are. Why would i get pissed or go out of my way to blacklist them?

Black humour: "The term black humor (from the French humour noir) was coined by the surrealist theorist André Breton in 1935[7][8] to label a subgenre of comedy and satire[9][10] in which laughter arises from cynicism and skepticism,[7][11] often relying on topics such as death.[12][13]"

Now you know.

Oh I like black humor, but it doesn't really work written, you should add at least a dank meme :c

Crossing my fingers that he will get an appropriate ban time!

no idea, and it doesn't work, or i use it in the wrong way. everytime i make it run it gives me the same two name

And that is where you and I differ my good man! I see this thread... immediately black list the creator because he is basically asking me to. Read a few laugh out loud blurbs and move on. You on the other hand try to help! That is an ultimate fail, and then ^^ guy up there states it best you try to use logic! hahahaah penultimate fail. Do you know where you are? This is the internet!
side note thanks for keeping the place fun and trying to help people even though many are beyond help.

Glad I was mistaken in my interpretation of your sentiments, then. ^.^

But no, it can get pretty nasty. I've several users that will leave a nasty comment on each of my threads they stumble onto, even with them being blacklisted. Of course, given that I blacklisted those specific users for hatespeech and the like to begin with, it's certainly to form.

There's actually a specific user that has previously stated that it's his right to stalk and harass people if he wants to, simply because it's a public forum 'and thus he can approach it however he likes, because if you post onto it, you give people the right to respond however they want', and has gone so far as to threaten me with continued harassment when I politely (and repeatedly) asked him to stop bullying me. He's shameless in avoiding any responsibility for his behavior, while being obsessed with his "right" to antagonize me whenever he feels like.

Meanwhile, some users I can't see eye-to-eye with do completely and easily agree to a "non-aggression pact", and strictly avoid further contact [and threat of antagonization] with me, as I do with them. We'll likely never be able to understand each other, but we can afford each other the basic respect we're each due.
Mewanhile, others support my forum events, rather than actively try and sabotage them,
As with one event where I made giveaways based on the number of participating responses over non-participating responses, where many users preferred to intentionally post something negative to lower the giveaway count for other users, rather than support those users in getting more giveaways (Which, you know, 'hurts' me- or rather, my wallet- a whole lot more.. :P But there's a consistent 'Screw Logic' approach with these users.)
or support an upset member of the forums. It won't make up for bigotry or other hardcore hate behavior (which is too irrational, unmanagable, and damaging to let run freely in things you invite others to participate in) but for anything else, those acts certainly invoke reconsideration of the user.

I regularly adjust my tags on users, and remove people from my blacklist when there's any chance I was mistaken about their conduct [and I want to provide them the opportunity to interact with me more, and less reservedly, to affirm that hope].
But, far more often, users'd prefer to lash out at anyone that blacklisted them, offered positivity or rebuke in the face of their negativity, or in any other way compromised their "right to hate without "censorship" "- and they enjoy engaging in this at every opportunity they can, rather than, y'know, take a moment to address the other individual as a person, rather than a game-dispensing bot that should learn to respect the right of its betters to hate as freely as they wish. -.-

For someone so interested in debating, he is indeed trigger happy. :I
They do sound a bit passive aggressive so i do appreciate the lack of communication

I always just assumed you were a wall intended to hold back water, perhaps up to 1224 billion gallons worth? =O

View attached image.

I BLd you as a form of support for Drafek who I feel is being unfairly treated by this community right now. Re-reading your comments here, on the first pass it sounds like you're trying to be an asshole, but the more I re-read the more I think I'm just reading too much into the way you write. Un-BLd due to lack of evidence.

Haha Yeah, atleast you got unblacklisted.

Well if you say that they are equal, both sides will consider that an insult, so ... worst case scenario? :-p

nah, not for this, the suicide jokester BL'd everyone who commented agaist the joke. ;)
OHH, nvm, u didn't comment there. sorry, my bad

& sorry u didn't get WL at the same time, that sux =(

edited: strikeout my mistake ;)

slowly?

Wouldn't say getting worse, but rather this is the effect of peeps not caring. If you neglect anything in life, it will go to shit. Far too many peeps would rather stay home and complain than go out and do something about it.

Change nothing and nothing changes.

^_^ Good to hear it!

OK, that's enough well expressed logic for now, I insist you join my whitelist :)

Yeah maybe you're right but when I make a giveaway for a bundled game people also get mad at me.

lol I didn't care for his ratio and bl attitude until this comment:
oh I am poor student
-have 10 Shadows of Mordor and CoI and many more listed above - Invalidate
on point, thanks

You nailed that one.