Did you click this link thinking steam was going to add subscription fees?

Quick question, would you use steam if it had Subscription fees? If so, how much would you pay?

I don't think I would have ever started using steam if it had subscription fees, when it started, steam was very unstable. Maybe now I would pay around $5 a month to use the service.

Edit:

It looks like the general conciseness is "No", which is that I was expecting. What if steam offered something else with the subscription, like discounts, special community sections, steaming, better cloud. What would it take for you to pay a fee?

I feel like xbox is charging for a service that should be free to begin with.

12 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

That would be the moment I'd become a semi-strictly GoG costumer.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Same here. There's no way I would pay subscription fees. Valve doesn't need it anyway, they already take their cut from each game sold on the store.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Me too!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Da Fuq? What % is your cut??

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No simple as (at least in it's current form) why would I want to subscribe to my own games.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

/\ THIS. I already bought my games...or someone else.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not really, you bought licences to use the games.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

True but from a license to use the game to paying monthly fees to access your games is a looong way.
Not to mention it's an unrealistic business model. Well, at least for now. It all depends on how far are companies going to push cloud computing. Just look at OnLive. Would you ditch retail & Steam for something like that?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thats like needing a subscription to walmart/gamestop/amazon to buy things. There is no ground for steam to charge a sub fee, nor is there a need. Steam is immensely profitable and thus far as shown to be a socially responsible company, IE a company that actually cares for its customers instead of the bottom line.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If Steam had subscription fees the whole System would be different. Then they would probably make a flatrate system like OnLive.

But when Steam will be the same I would never pay something to use a store and DRM, there are many alternatives.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

pay for DRM? no

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No, I clicked this link thinking someone thought Steam was going to add subscription fees.

And no, I doubt I would.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hell no!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I second this motion.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Lol steam fanboys are ready to pay for drm bundled with a friends list and some crappy community features.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

only Xbox live gold member wants to pay to play online. No true PC gamer would ever want to play something that has always been free. Your question is out of any possibilities. Maybe one day, they will a something like a gold/plus/whatever with more bonus (though i don't see any) but they won't ever make steam with fee for using. How would you justify to make people like me, using steam for 9 years, having lot of game, suddenly pay to access my account ? Well, i spare you a headache, they won't even try.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hell no I wouldn't

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If the games were cheaper, maybe I would pay

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I thought the subscription fee was the money we pay to "subscribe" to games on Steam.

Why would they add another fee on top of that?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There are months when I don't have any free time to play, so I probably wouldn't pay for a subscription, wouldn't be worth it. ):

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

no subscription fees would drive the loyal steam fanbase to otherways to play their games such as cracking them if need be just to play something that they own. if steam had a few adverts on the store i wouldn't mind since that would not be out of my own pocket.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

why would I pay extra money to play games which cost 60€... so... no...

If I get free games like the valve games... maybe... something similiar to the PS3 thing....

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Um, wow - really? As many have pointed out - paying for DRM is just (not seems) crazy, especially when you consider all the games you didn't buy via Steam directly, but have added through their portal - why would I pay to play those? They are basically an overlay that adds in-game features (friend's list, achievements, etc.) and as of now there are other similar services (Raptr for one) that do similar things for free.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Steam makes people unable to use most of the Community section until you purchase/activate any product. For example, buying Fortix for 0.99$ can be considered the smallest "subscription fee", if that's what you mean.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Of course I wouldn't pay.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, we wouldn't have much choice. It's scary thinking about it. We got all these games that work only on their service, so if they were to change their terms or whatever...

Of course, I don't expect this to happen as long as Gaben is on the throne.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Já pago os jogos, então eu não iria pagar nenhuma assinatura.

Dinheiro não cai do céu.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

no i wouldnt

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

amazon gives services and discounts to prime members. It is really good. You get streaming video, books you can check out, free 2 day shipping and discounts.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That would be the moment when i would go back to pirating games.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If steam would offer a "premium" thing or something, pretty cheap with exclusive Sales/free Games or something like this, of course i would subscribe,

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeh, a totally optional + adds features rather than taking them away type of service I would consider for sure.

I would also consider this for SG :)

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

or with better download rates. Holy crap would i throw money at Steam if I could download games during sales at > 100kb/s

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How would it even work? A fee to access the games, even single player? Even Xbox isn't that bad, only need gold to play online.

Or would the fee be for online features/steam cloud/multiplayer? Well, the MP on most games is handled by the game itself, not Steam so that wouldn't make sense. The could charge for the 'community' and Steam cloud, but that would be really weaksauce and I think most wouldn't bother.

The problem with any company doing this on PC is that people could just change to another service. It's not like console where you have no choice.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 12 years ago by Scottbert.