You'd have to make some for more than the 5 people in one of your groups/chat for me to have an opinion on that.
Comment has been collapsed.
+1 there are some quackers giveaways I'd really like to hide.
Comment has been collapsed.
cg, I summon thee thou thine to consider this request. ಠ‿ಠ
Comment has been collapsed.
It's time consuming and tiresome yet useless to do that. Some people just create tens of giveaways which I do not want to enter, and there are quite people doing that. And some time later, they do it again with new giveaways. Would be good just ignore the person instead of each giveaway.
Comment has been collapsed.
Heyo Sighery! :3.
Is it possible to implement this same thing for groups? So, I wouldn't see giveaways for specific groups?
But there will be some challenges I think. If a giveaway is shared to multiple groups, let's say a, b and c, and I'm part of a and b. I should be able to see the giveaway if I only chose either a or b or I shouldn't be able to see the giveaway if I choose both of a and b.
Comment has been collapsed.
I wish you could also blackout the people who were ignored, like a default username or even something like a black picture can be enough too.
Btw, I've found a script for my desires: https://github.com/Daerphen/sgscripts/blob/master/sggroupexcluder.user.js
(◕‿◕✿).
Edit: You need to use both that and this: https://github.com/Daerphen/sgscripts/blob/master/sggroupidentifier.user.js
Edit 2: Still desn't work properly. It does ignore whitelists I think.
Comment has been collapsed.
i can't seem to get it to function with a couple public GA tests i ran with random people.
(just chose a cple random public GA's to try and hide with this, and it doesn't seem to filter them as it should)
first 12 lines of code
// ==UserScript==
// @name Hide Giveaways by User
// @version 0.1
// @description https://www.steamgifts.com/go/comment/W96zLbg
// @author Sighery
// @match https://www.steamgifts.com/*
// ==/UserScript==
var ignoreLst = ["d3m4n", "Vee79", "trono"]; //Nicks should go here, tipical array, you should know what to do.
if (window.location.href == "https://www.steamgifts.com/" || window.location.href.match(".steamgifts.com/giveaways") !== null) {
hideGiveaways();
}
those users are just test examples, not really keeping them in there.
Comment has been collapsed.
yes, full script code =
// ==UserScript==
// @name Hide Giveaways by User
// @version 0.1
// @description https://www.steamgifts.com/go/comment/W96zLbg
// @author Sighery
// @match https://www.steamgifts.com/*
// ==/UserScript==
var ignoreLst = ["Vee79", "trono", "d3m4n"]; //Nicks should go here, typical array, you should know what to do.
if (window.location.href == "https://www.steamgifts.com/" || window.location.href.match(".steamgifts.com/giveaways") !== null) {
hideGiveaways();
}
function hideGiveaways() {
var gaUsernames = document.getElementsByClassName("giveaway__username");
for (var i = 0; i < gaUsernames.length; i++) {
var nickname = gaUsernames[i].innerHTML;
if (checkLst(nickname, ignoreLst)) {
gaUsernames[i].parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.style.display = "none";
}
}
}
function checkLst(value, list) {
if (list.indexOf(value) == -1) {
return false;
} else {
return true;
}
}
i've tried taking quotes out, and re-arranging the users in the ignore-list, still i continue to see the giveaways by those users though.
possibly one of the other dozen scripts i have running interfering with it?
Comment has been collapsed.
yeah, it's conflicting with>
// @description Giveaway filter for SteamGifts v2
// @author Garion
Comment has been collapsed.
no problem =) i understand. tbh i'm not sure in which case i'd use this anyways, was just testing it out. =)
tried loading it right after though and it doesn't seem to make a difference. no big deal to me though, thanks for helping me troubleshoot. ^^
Comment has been collapsed.
i'm pretty sure this is 100% unrelated to scripts, and has everything to do with my very crappy internet cutting out at the wrong time.. but i can't quite seem to figure out how to fix, so asking...
all buttons seem broken for me now. -- all scripts turned off or on doesn't matter, tried flushing dns, and tried force refreshing (shift+f5) -- any idea how to repair?
(whitelist, group, notification tray, blacklist, & invite only -- gone/not showing)
--sent invite on steam so we don't have to keep bumping this. ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
i remember that, the solution was flushdns, which doesn't seem to be fixing it for me. i also tried deleting cache associated with steamgifts.com (not a full cache wipe, but i had to login SG again), but the buttons all seem broken still for me.
my internet did cut-out completely while trying to load the site, i had to restart the router to get internet to come back, and this was the side effect of that happening.
np on steam invite, i understand ^^
edit: it's my crappy internet, now i'm getting partial button access -- my internets DNS is all out of whack atm.
i think it will fix itself once my internet settles down.
Comment has been collapsed.
yeah, i think lay down and cry till it works itself out is about all that's left :D hehe
its okay, i can manage now that it has the area that the button is supposed to be. at first the whole area was gone, but now it's just the missing icon only. thanks for trying ^^
Comment has been collapsed.
What's the point? Why would it make a difference when you see their giveaway or not? For GAs in threads you can simply choose not to open any thread made by them, and I don't know how their GAs among a sea of GAs in the general category would trouble you so much that you just wish to eliminate it absolutely. This sort of feature is best left for utility of scripts that you can use personally, since I don't believe it's worth the hassle of implementing site-wise.
Comment has been collapsed.
When I made this thread, the duck guy (Sal) that was extorting game developers (to give him free games or he'll give them negative reviews and tell his members to do the same) was posting lots of giveaways that most of us didn't want to see. Whether it's implemented via the site or a script doesn't really matter to me, and personally I don't see a "sea of giveaways" anyway. I have 6805 items hidden on my list.
That people have updated their scripts now to support this feature in some capacity is nice, though I don't trust any of them enough to try them out.
Comment has been collapsed.
I always sort by Recommended, WL and Group only so personally I don't browse the public category, but yeah I can see where you're coming from.. I think a script will definitely help you then. As for trust-ability I guess you could always try to search for trustworthy users, because the reason you stated is exactly why I don't use scripts myself
Comment has been collapsed.
Funny fact about this, I felt the same and explained the situation and asked him to blacklist me. He did, and since that time I didn't have to deal with his bullshit. At least I have that much to thank him for. :D
Comment has been collapsed.
545 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by UltraMaster
41 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by ViToos
69 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Hawkingmeister
1,520 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by ayuinaba
451 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Rosefildo
1,806 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by FranckCastle
7 Comments - Last post 18 hours ago by xXSAFOXx
7,992 Comments - Last post 49 seconds ago by schmetti
41 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by GeoSol
9,525 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by CurryKingWurst
28,262 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Yamaraus
10,779 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by PastelLicuado
691 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by Fitz10024
113 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by a19978221
Just an option to not see anything a specific user makes. I guess coding-wise it would be a self blacklisting database controlled by the user who wants to ban themselves. The trick is connecting you to that user instead of that user to you. The only option at the moment is to convince them to blacklist you either by requesting it or by pissing them off. So it's not an ideal solution, particularly when you dislike them and want no further contact.
I can't speak for everyone but I would appreciate such a feature very much personally.
Comment has been collapsed.