I remember hearing about one that allowed you to click to enter from the main list like you can with IG which would help save on bandwidth since you wouldn't have to load a page every time.
From what I understand extension loads page in background, there is no link like www.steamgifts.com/giveaway/skyrim-Vi/enter that could be generated by script. So you "load" said page without knowing it and script just shows the shortcut link to what it loaded in background. Someone correct me if wrong, but IMO you would not save anything by using enter from main page.
Comment has been collapsed.
Script still needs to load up all those pages in background to generate the link between "giveaway" and "enter button". So while it does not load images themselves, it does cause web browse to open more pages in background than it normally would.
Unless it creates "place holder" button that only loads giveaway page in background when you interact with it. But seeing cg had to curb number of requests that people can send per second, as people were making scripts that were broken in how they worked - don't think they think that much about limiting number of requests they make to minimum. But I may be wrong. Won't go now and try to understand javascript they use to write extensions.
Comment has been collapsed.
What makes "enter" button work is not HTML but javascript.
And it's simple to check, as disabling javascript makes "enter" button unusable. It is there, but it's not possible to click it to enter. So scripts do not parse HTML only, they must load whole javascript.
Comment has been collapsed.
Unfortunately, you're not quite correct. To enter a giveaway the script doesn't need anything beyond html, because the script itself can implement any required logic without the original scripts. It just replicate the original behavior in a desired way. That's one of the reasons why third-party scripts can break if an original implementation changes.
Comment has been collapsed.
Is there a way to test to make sure it can only change the HTML for interacting with just this domain and not access input on other sites? Wouldn't want it stealing passwords.
Not sure about other extensions and browsers but ESGST in Firefox requires to enable permissions explicitly for every site it can use.
Also you can try other extensions (like NoScript or uMatrix) which limit access to third-party sites.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, but the more important question is whether they're sponge-worthy
Comment has been collapsed.
3,490 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by hbarkas
17,512 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by rufioh
1,964 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by ekees
25 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by lordmonty3
302 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by steveywonder75
582 Comments - Last post 14 hours ago by Filipi
475 Comments - Last post 15 hours ago by MJMJ
129 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Microfish
1,172 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Almostn33t
383 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by OurMajesty
54 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by Tudvari
11,372 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by Hodexii
76 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by OllieOtson
61 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Giannisg
I remember hearing about one that allowed you to click to enter from the main list like you can with IG which would help save on bandwidth since you wouldn't have to load a page every time. Just not sure about giving access to browsing to random extensions. Is there a way to test to make sure it can only change the HTML for interacting with just this domain and not access input on other sites? Wouldn't want it stealing passwords.
Comment has been collapsed.