Let me quote one of my previous reroll ticket responses here:
"The 1 month clause only applies when the winner has already served their suspension. If they have not yet been suspended for a game they have won, a reroll will be approved no matter how old it is."
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you for that as I wasn't 100% sure about this. :-)
So in the end it never hurts to ask SG support for a re-roll as giveaway creators have no way of knowing if a winner that has non-activated games has already been suspended or not.
Comment has been collapsed.
47,283 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by MeguminShiro
284 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by osztihun
2 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by reigifts
450 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by LastPigStanding
175 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by SP1TFIRE90
18 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by plantshop
702 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by JonathanDoe
71 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by ormax3
113 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by gzekka
1,594 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by jiggakills
9 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by wigglenose
737 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by skylarkblue1
15 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by Jarlaxe
6 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by reigifts
What difference does it make which month the non-activated wins are, if the person hasn't been reported yet?
In other words, if someone has unactivated wins from last month, but no one ever reported them, but then someone discovers them this month, is it too late? Is there some kind of statute of limitations on rule violations?
Comment has been collapsed.