Actually, the imagery immediately reminded me of stuff like Un Chien Andalou or Begotten, so I was kinda primed for being creeped out. I wasn't really watching it as I would watch a "regular" short movie.
Somebody really should run the same experiment with a modern video, shot in full color and with contemporary cinematic techniques. I'm sure a modern audience would respond to something like that in pretty much the same way the first audiences responded to Kuleshov's movie back then.
Edit: Also, it was quite obvious to me the shots of the man's face were always the same. It probably would not be so obvious to the original audiences.
Comment has been collapsed.
"Drastic" is a well-chosen word.
The video is supposed to act as a cultural experiment, but the cultural landscape has changed drastically since it was shot. Initially, B&W imagery was the norm, and the audiences would not get stuck up on it. It would just be the neutral background on which the game takes place.
Today, B&W is totally out of place. It is practically reserved for screamers, parodies and hipstering. The change in the medium is so great that it totally drowns out the content. I don't think you'll find many who will respond "as intended". I also don't think you should write this up as the Internet desensitivizing the new generation. It seems like the obvious answer, but until you make a modern adaptation of the experiment, you can't be sure that's what's at play here.
Comment has been collapsed.
Nothing... what am I supposed to feel?
I noticed the dead body has a white hand and a black hand...
Comment has been collapsed.
wow, the video kinda scary, i thought it was setting up for a screamer or something
how i felt?, really wierd, i dont know maybe like the guy was hiding something and it was related with what was shown
edit: now that i looked it up, apparently it was right, i always felt the guy was changing his face depending on what he saw.
Comment has been collapsed.
well, to be honest, i did felt that the guy was changing his face, but i diidnt mentioned it at first because i thought that i was just going crazy and that he actually didint changed his face, so i did not told it.
Comment has been collapsed.
I was terrified it was a screamer the entire time.
Comment has been collapsed.
I literally started laughing after the second appearance of the guy. Dunno why, it just seemed really stupid and out of place for me.
I don't know how I'm supposed to feel since I haven't research the thing yet, but I'm quite interested. Those kind of experiments usually do not work on me though :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, I just looked it up and it seems interesting, especially since I love learning about video editing tricks.
I can also see how the 'correct' way would work, although for me, the scenes look too much out of place. Maybe if I'd watch the video a couple of times without not knowing how I'm supposed to feel, I'd start to feel it as well. Watching it for the first time however, the video was too weird for me to take seriously. I'm a weird person though and, as I've said, those kind of things don't really work on me :)
Comment has been collapsed.
I've learnt about the Kuleshov effect but did not remember the footage. In my opinion the thory is valid but this footage isn't quite the most able to demonstrate it. To demonstrate it you have to show different combinations to different audiences.
ex :
audience 1 sees facial expression, then the meal.
audience 2 sees facial expression, then the dead girl.
audience 3 sees facial expression, then the "sexy girl".
then you ask each audience what they felt about the guys facial expression.
edit : for those who find that weird, this is what the kuleshov effect is about : (from wikipedia)
Kuleshov edited together a short film in which a shot of the expressionless face of Tsarist matinee idol Ivan Mosjoukine was alternated with various other shots (a plate of soup, a girl in a coffin, a woman on a divan). The film was shown to an audience who believed that the expression on Mosjoukine's face was different each time he appeared, depending on whether he was "looking at" the plate of soup, the girl in the coffin, or the woman on the divan, showing an expression of hunger, grief or desire, respectively. Actually the footage of Mosjoukine was the same shot repeated over and over again. Vsevolod Pudovkin (who later claimed to have been the co-creator of the experiment) described in 1929 how the audience "raved about the acting... the heavy pensiveness of his mood over the forgotten soup, were touched and moved by the deep sorrow with which he looked on the dead child, and noted the lust with which he observed the woman. But we knew that in all three cases the face was exactly the same."
Comment has been collapsed.
yeah, I must admit I continue to feel a difference between the facial expressions even now, so I guess it also works the way you put it
Comment has been collapsed.
this is a bit late, but it didn't really connect think about it in terms of the actor changing his expression for different things, more that all these things were in the same room and it attempting to build a short artistic story out of it. Interesting to read the actual purpose for it though
Comment has been collapsed.
42 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by RowdyOne
58 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by SketCZ
85 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by WaxWorm
16,299 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Carenard
1,811 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by ngoclong19
72 Comments - Last post 15 hours ago by Reidor
545 Comments - Last post 17 hours ago by UltraMaster
10,788 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by JMM72
57 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by Akuburanir
33 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by mashiu2000
23 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by Ad4m
151 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by TinaG
203 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by UnknownEAK
804 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MyrXIII
Good evening ladies and gentlemen,
I was writting an essay and found myself something curious about one of my classes, its an experiment made by the famous film-maker Lev Kuleshov. I would like you guys to check it out if you want without investigating about it at first: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gGl3LJ7vHc Comment what you felt and such.
P.S. I love sidescrolling.
EDIT: Thank you very much gentlemen for your responses, and thank you DavidSarif since it was something I might have skipped in mentioning. All in all, its something worth thinking about in relation to modern movie audiences.
...Oh that's right, good luck in the giveaway.
Comment has been collapsed.