Dem Reply Girls

lol

Yes, I noticed this last time I watched Yogscast's videos, and I agree:

This is plain stupid.

never heard of yogscast but there is always 5-6 of these next to freddiew's vids.

looooooooool http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q32ANF1wqSE&list=UUIRQAHbOxOv4O0xFT2ln3yg&feature=plcp

They are attention whores. Soulless women who think if they show some tits people will listen to them.

Those brainless bitches earn gazillion of bucks without even show oiled tits. Just kill 'em all.

You just shouldn't watch their vids. Thats how they survive.

totally annoyin whenever im watchin game vids or other stuff an i see those stupid girls in the video previes i just ew.. -.-
cant imagine how so many horny boys rly click an watch their vids just to flame on them or watch their not even naked boobies.
cmon there are thousands of porn sites for free. go and watch em
i just dont get it.

"my boobs (or lack thereof for you sick people)"

What. Wait if someone isn't into big boobs they are sick people.

Ok....O_o

LOOK AT ME! I'M AN ATTENTION WHORE!

Sent from my iPad.

This guy knows what to say.

Am I the only one who mutes their videos just to see nice faces and hot boobs? Especially lauratickled and meganspeaks xD

they leech off of popular videos like parasites. some even get money for it. what scum

I prefer this video about Reply Girls, love the british accent:

Video

lulz

Personally i'm only subscribed to channels like RayWilliamJonson (its an ok watch, sometimes there are great videos there), freddiew, Corridordigital and ERB (epic rap battles of history), and while i dont usually pay any attention to the related videos, it enfuriates me to see every "related" video is just one of those reply kind of channels, i've been reporting and flagging like hell, but so far i have yet to see any results about it....

People aren't over Yogscast yet? Bunch of conceited pricks.

Reply videos are just something you learn to avoid while browsing Youtube.

"If Richard Dawkins posted a video that was downvoted by a whole load of creationists, should we hide it from the related videos on YouTube?" My reply to this was: "Yes, if he was ripping off the title, tags, putting no original content into the video and showing off his cleavage in the thumbnail." - If Dawkins was showing off some man cleavage on Youtube, I think we'd have much bigger problems to deal with. Just sayin'.

The first time I saw one of those replies in a video I pretty much figured out exactly what was going on just based on the title (re: RE:) and the thumbnail and just didn't click on it (e: not that I watch any reply videos, but still). Seriously, if you want to look at boobs go watch some porn.

This.