We don't want to ban politic discussion, I already wrote about it. As long as discussion doesn't break guideline it is allowed.
But I don't want discussions to end up being a wall of news articles from another websites. We are not news aggregation website. I already wrote about it to other users. Especially those re-posting russian propaghanda over and over again in numerous posts. But if I want to stop this from happening the same rule must be applied to all users. Even those that post news from credited sources with "western propaghanda".
I did not aim against you, I hope you understand that.
For normal discussions, I think it is fine to relax and view and maintain the status quo, but when it comes to "wars" I feel that the future situation is not good.
Currently, I think you know about the organized postings (which even the moderators feel are propaganda).
There are of course those who comment negatively on them.
However, I feel that the current situation is to fry those users individually and try to "make the discussion obsolete" and take away the very environment where discussion can take place.
Personally, I've been feeling lately that SteamGifts might be better served if they were directed to a place with a "bulletproof" or "firewall" against such activities before they get drawn into a war.
I think it would be better for Ukraine's domestic and international users if it continued.
I think it would be better for decent users in Russia to continue.
However, if it interferes with the general business operations of the SG, it is my recent feeling that it might be better to leave the "war" to where the "preparedness" is.
(Actually, I don't know if SG is backed up by the CIA, FBI, or MI6, but if they are, my concerns are probably unfounded.)
NetBlocks on Twitter: "ℹ️ Update: Internet access has been partially restored on provider Maxnet in #Kharkiv, northeast Ukraine, following a total loss of connectivity attributed to power outages amid combat. However, service remains significantly degraded. 📰 Background: " / Twitter https://twitter.com/netblocks/status/1517898480588668930
So far, the only disturbances that have caused social networking services to be shut down seem to be services in areas in the middle of a war zone, but I feel that a "firewall" is needed when things get too hot.
I hope there is some good solution.
For listening. Thanks again.🤔🔎🦠
Thanks ^_^
Comment has been collapsed.
ty
Comment has been collapsed.
thanks!
Comment has been collapsed.
thank you
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you.
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you!
Comment has been collapsed.
ty
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you.
Comment has been collapsed.
thanks
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 2 years ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
We don't want to ban politic discussion, I already wrote about it. As long as discussion doesn't break guideline it is allowed.
But I don't want discussions to end up being a wall of news articles from another websites. We are not news aggregation website. I already wrote about it to other users. Especially those re-posting russian propaghanda over and over again in numerous posts. But if I want to stop this from happening the same rule must be applied to all users. Even those that post news from credited sources with "western propaghanda".
I did not aim against you, I hope you understand that.
Comment has been collapsed.
https://www.steamgifts.com/go/comment/RwnDnN5
I have seen matters 1.2.3.4.5, so I had an approximate understanding of that.
Thank you for all your help.yup((´Θ`*)yup
For normal discussions, I think it is fine to relax and view and maintain the status quo, but when it comes to "wars" I feel that the future situation is not good.
Currently, I think you know about the organized postings (which even the moderators feel are propaganda).
There are of course those who comment negatively on them.
However, I feel that the current situation is to fry those users individually and try to "make the discussion obsolete" and take away the very environment where discussion can take place.
This all sounds like a conspiracy theory....┐(´Θ`)┌Oh...
https://www.steamgifts.com/support/ticket/QX0NE/
If it is in your purview, you can read the contents of this support ticket.
https://www.steamgifts.com/support/ticket/dbvlS/
I picked up the information on the second support ticket as to why there are so many such users, and it will be the one I sent you with the information.
Personally, I've been feeling lately that SteamGifts might be better served if they were directed to a place with a "bulletproof" or "firewall" against such activities before they get drawn into a war.
I think it would be better for Ukraine's domestic and international users if it continued.
I think it would be better for decent users in Russia to continue.
However, if it interferes with the general business operations of the SG, it is my recent feeling that it might be better to leave the "war" to where the "preparedness" is.
(Actually, I don't know if SG is backed up by the CIA, FBI, or MI6, but if they are, my concerns are probably unfounded.)
NetBlocks on Twitter: "ℹ️ Update: Internet access has been partially restored on provider Maxnet in #Kharkiv, northeast Ukraine, following a total loss of connectivity attributed to power outages amid combat. However, service remains significantly degraded. 📰 Background: " / Twitter https://twitter.com/netblocks/status/1517898480588668930
So far, the only disturbances that have caused social networking services to be shut down seem to be services in areas in the middle of a war zone, but I feel that a "firewall" is needed when things get too hot.
I hope there is some good solution.
For listening. Thanks again.🤔🔎🦠
Comment has been collapsed.