909 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by BlazeHaze
4 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by Chris76de
2,379 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
122 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Reidor
34 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Melusca
74 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by ZeePilot
241 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by ShannonA81
159 Comments - Last post 31 seconds ago by Moony1986
65 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by MikeWithAnI
29,511 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by irste
21 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by ErhanT
1,617 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by jiggakills
49 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by reigifts
1,589 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by Bladito
This is basically a repackaging of the Deponia games. It's up to you whether or not you want to allow those who own the entire series to enter for this package.
Comment has been collapsed.
I've been lead to believe on numerous occasions that that doesn't apply in cases like this where it's not a regular bundle/package but actually a separate game/appid. Stuff like this needs deciding upon and stating somewhere officially.
Comment has been collapsed.
It has already been officially stated.
If a winner owns any part of a package, the creator may ask for a re-roll. Most giveaway creators are fairly generous, however, so there are rarely any problems. This is not to be confused with differing versions of the same game (e.g. Metro 2033 Redux) which are considered separate and distinct.
This particular package contains a lot more than just the three games, so it would not be surprising for the creator to allow entry to anyone who has an interest.
Comment has been collapsed.
My point was that this isn't just a package though, just like your example of Metro it's a separate game. Your first post implies the user will be granted a reroll for ownership of any of the "included" games yet your second post contradicts this.
http://imgur.com/a/7nfTc
Comment has been collapsed.
As I don't own the Complete Journey, I can only go by the description (which is somewhat vague). My understanding is that the package contains all three games along with additional material, but my understanding could be wrong. If the three games have been remastered or altered, then the package would fall into the second category. If they remain the original versions, then the first category applies.
Comment has been collapsed.
Changes to the content, if any shouldn't factor into it. This isn't three existing products PLUS bonus content its a separate product. It has its own library entry, its own achievements, if it was a multiplayer product it would likely have its own servers.
You aren't entering for a product you already own as the developers/publishers chose to sell it as a new product rather than a package of existing products.
Your uncertainty in the matter only highlights why it needs to be clearly defined rather than being at the whim of the staff on a product by product basis.
Comment has been collapsed.
"The matter" is not at the whim of the staff on a product by product basis. The rule about inclusion is clear, as is the rule about differing versions being considered different games. The criterion for those rules' application is also clear. As for my uncertainty in this example, the sole basis for it is my ignorance of whether or not this package meets the aforementioned criterion, and that is clear as well.
What is not clear is why you seem to be arguing about a point you just made and with which I agreed. If this "isn't three existing products PLUS bonus content," then it is not possible for anyone to own part of it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for Deponia! This is going to fun. :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Welcome! It's a very fun saga, so...enjoy the games!
Comment has been collapsed.