i think this is a movie or a short movie something
btw guys.. if u don't mind giving me some ideas on an assignment of mine.
I'd highly appreciate it:
-----Critically assess the extent to which “the ideas of economists” might improve the performance of an organisation of your choice. ----
30 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by WaxWorm
55 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by XfinityX
16,285 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Xarliellon
1,797 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by MeguminShiro
493 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by sallachim
205 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by carlica
381 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by OsManiaC
29 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by ExcelElmira
33 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by OhTheFolly
27 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by GangsterJochen
2 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by ewoda
28 Comments - Last post 39 minutes ago by refat17
194 Comments - Last post 57 minutes ago by escollo
16,778 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Operations
"incentives matter" - look at incentives for management and ensure they are consistent w/ long term success for the company. Management will usually do what allows them to achieve highest bonus, however they need to go about doing it. This is not always consistent with value creation. (Ex: rewarding sales growth at expense of lower margins?) Additionally, there are non-economic incentives, such as status, to consider. Not all rewards are monetary. anyhow, that's my $0.02 contribution.
Comment has been collapsed.
wow that was fast, this is actually an assignment for my 3rd degree and im not good in our next modules which is politics and economics.
THANKS MAN HIGHLY APPRECIATED!!
Comment has been collapsed.
You're welcome. I'm an econ grad, and where I spent much of my career I saw people chasing goals. It's kindof like the scandal at Wells Fargo - you get exactly what you incentivize. In their case, they incentivized opening accounts. For some this became an end in itself, regardless of value creation for the company. People will focus exactly on what they need to do to reach goals - so be very careful how those goals are set. Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger probably have some good quotes about looking at incentives for management, and the importance of setting the proper incentives. (Buffett criticizes options as compensation because it does not necessarily align management compensation with shareholders).
Another thing I think is important is Talib's idea of fat tails, Black Swans. One of the first examples of this is the failure of Long Term Capital Management back in the 90s, a firm brought down by an event that should've "never" happened. The idea of non-normal distributions is important because it means extreme events are likely to occur more often than you think they will. Much of finance/economics has probably adjusted to this idea as it's well discussed now, but it's easy to downplay risk of rare events.
There's also alot of very interesting stuff in behavioral economics, about non-rational human behavior. I find this some of the most interesting work in the economics field. There's too much to go into here in a post, but check out Dan Ariely's work, and probably Kahneman's book Thinking Fast and Slow . Essential idea is our innate behaviors were evolutionarily honed in an environment very different than the one we live in today. One example is loss aversion - losing $100 feels much worse than winning $100 feels good. Or anchoring effect, where we are slow to update our priors. There's an effect where we value something more if we own it, than if we don't own it (I think that's why it's so hard to make trades in fantasy football). There are many. Marketer's utilize effects like these to sell things to us.
Comment has been collapsed.
coz of ur guide, i had an idea and helped me more in my research got at least a thousand words in now
THANKS !
Comment has been collapsed.
Ideas are nothing without action. People die with "great ideas" in their heads... or they witness other people execute them and claim they thought of that idea years ago... without action, its nothing more than a thought.
So an economist can have fancy ideas all he/she wants, but without the means to implement it's worth less than the dime in his pocket!
In order for an economist to really impact an organization, they would of had to run a similar type of organization successfully and recently.. to understand all the nuances of said business, marketing strategies, etc, which is highly unlikely, otherwise an economists' ideas are just a theory.
sorry... just had to critically assess!
;)
but thanks for sharing the game.. and i do hope your assignment goes well.
Comment has been collapsed.
I like that! imma use ur idea to improve mine. thanks buddy!
Comment has been collapsed.
i have no idea about economy, sorry :(
Comment has been collapsed.
no problem buddy
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you!
Comment has been collapsed.