So I was wandering through the threads here, and I came across this one. I'm seriously appalled at a lot of the responses. If you check his Steam account you'll a posting of the news report in the comments.

8 years ago

Comment has been collapsed.

That's definitely not a real news report.

But if he did harm himself, then that's awful.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You can easily find several news reports if you search.

That being said, I'd say more of the responses were supportive rather than negative. But it's the internet, and you're going to get those kind of negative responses anywhere you go. And it's impossible to tell if someone is being serious or not with posts like that... though I encourage people to err on the side of caution and treat all such instances seriously.

Has the community matured overall? I don't think so, in fact, I think it's only regressed as the site has grown, as do most online communities. Least common denominator? Though I think there's been an uptick in quality after several trollish forum posters left.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As with many public communities that are only very loosely policed. Certain people will float to the top while others are more than happy to stay below the surface.
The larger the volume of users, the more skewed the representation.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The internet is not good or bad more than the rest of the society. It's only a subset of what lies out there. IMHO you can't really measure the maturity of a single human being (everyone of us has his highs and his lows, good days and bad days, happy times and harsh times), much less an entire community of thousands of people.

You will find every kind of person here as much as out of here. People craving for attention. Bored people. People only mildly suffering but being very vocal about it. And, of course, people seriously suffering. We all make statistics in our minds, and i'm pretty sure we've all seen far more people claiming to be about to suicide than people who actually suicided. Trolls are everywhere and you can never tell if someone is serious or just joking/trolling (statistically, they are). I can't really blame people who didn't believe him...

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Last Online 781 days ago

Feels

Master_of_nonsense 15 Jan, 2014 @ 3:57am
i'll go ahead and put this here for anyone who still remains confused as to what happened.
11/11/13, 5:15 AM. tuesday.
Fausto delgado, at age 16, committed suicide by jumping in front of a BART-company train.
delgado said to me one day, when i questioned him about his depression and thoughts of suicide, he said to me:
"life's so sad, i don't want to grow up. i'll stay a kid forever".
delgado's death reminded me of my own problems, in a way. and it reminded me: "life's too good to throw away. when you feel sad and depressed, try your hardest to look on the bright side, and think of how much you REALLY mean to the world. your life, and your death, will move many people, and show that in the long run, all living things are important, and you, are important too."
I'm terribly sorry for anyone who's been close to del, and his family, and I pray that you all may continue life without worry.
May your trails lead you to happiness.
-Master_of_nonsense.

EVEN MORE FEELS

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Found a video on the topic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgDU3Pxa7IM

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Christ... ;~;

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He actually posted on reddit, but it looks like he didn't get much support there either :(

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ahh man...

View attached image.
8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Be realistic: why would he? The internet is full of teens with their (usually absolutely irrelevant) dramas and how awful their life is, yadda, yadda, yadda. Most teens are like that. I'd wager most of us were like that. Nobody can known beforehand that hey, this is the one kid out of the other hundred thousand who actually did it.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

For that reason it is better to be safe than sorry.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

because he posted it on a (sub)forum dedicated to helping people with suicidal thoughts? and how was anyone there supposed to know he was a teenager?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The original thread started him crying about he playing Binding of Isaac and saying he is suicidal and will kill himself in one day. That pretty much tells it is a teenager. An adult would not complain about a game, they would state what their actual problem is. Even people with depression write letters listing how they got to the point.
The original thread looked the same as any other thread with a teen with a need for attention, and it is not rare to see teens use the "I will kill myself" 'threat', like how a small child will pout by saying they will hold their breath until they get what they want. If you just read that thread now without knowing anything about any later detail, you'd most likely skim past it like any other similar one.
Teens love drama. If they wouldn't, there wouldn't been an entire sub-genre of such in literature and film. And on the internet, where anyone can say anything, it is next to impossible to differentiate between an actual cry for help and another kid wanting to get some online attention because wanting to feel important. Especially on a forum that is about putting up game keys for lottery.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This. People are getting less and less serious, you can't really blame anyone for not taking that guy seriously, if he acted the same way as other 999 clowns. You should blame people that are responsible for such outcome.

I feel sorry for him, but if anyone expects from the internet to act "properly", in the world of trolls and drama queens, then you'll get deeply disappointed. People can get very emotional reading comments on the internet, and a post that is completely normal to the poster, can actually really hurt the other person, it's sad that most people often forget that they're talking with other humans, they can never imagine themselves as the ones that receive such harsh response.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Fun fact, today someone posted something like "guys, I think I'm gonna kill myself" on my Steam group. After asking him about it, turns out he was talking about being tired of seeing "GabeN: The Final Decision" being given away for free.

I often feel like too many people use these words for non-serious reasons. I personally think that, unless you really want to commit suicide, never, never say you want to do it. It will only confuse people.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

When you have suicide thoughts, you don't act in logical way. It's the same case with serial killers, most of them don't have any valid, logical reason, something is just telling them to kill, same as something is telling people with suicide thoughts that there's no way to deal with problems and suicide is the only option.

I think every human at least once in a life has suicide thought, like "maybe I'll just kill myself?" when the situation gets really tough. We live in a world where even the most simple and really easy to deal with problem, can become a serious issue, especially if person is not strong enough to deal with it. It's hard for me to explain that, as I'm not psychologist, but I know that every person has better/worse skill of problem-solving, and the worse the skill is, the less options to help yourself you see, in the worst case, you see suicide as the only solution to the problem.

And sometimes, even if you're in fact skilled and good in problem solving, suicide is the only way. Take a look at Hitler for instance, I'd probably commit a suicide myself if I knew that I'll for sure be prisoned and tortured for the rest of my life if I decide otherwise. Those situations are very rare though, but sometimes the situation is so tough that suicide is indeed the only option. What if that guy had much deeper problems we didn't know about, and that thread just convinced him that suicide is the only way? You must have a very strong willing to commit suicide, it's not freaking easy. It's actually much harder than just shooting random guy on the street.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Probably the most of the people who responded there thought he was trolling or joking. At first it looked so to me too. That's why Internet shouldn't be place where you want a serious support concerning real life problems.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"Lots of people don't know that i am suicidal the whole time. I only have 1 day left to live. I just want to say, it been a great honer on steam and on steamgifts. My account is now dead and I am now dead, so good luck everybody // This thread is now dead, and I am now dead and yes I have to say that twice."
once I read the above I knew sh*t was real. Then I saw "Last Online 782 days ago" and last game played... . Not being in the greatest of times myself, this sure does have "feels".

I guess I'm one of the few who know how humans are and how well the internet reflects the true nature of humans. Too bad the internet is at times the only place some people can go in order to have "human contact" and not be completely alone.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I really feel sorry for him, I wish I was a SG user back then...

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

same

the world is not a fair place, nor will it ever be, oh well...

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This thing might as well be true but honestly it doesn't have much to do with the maturity of the SG community. Which is very low, by the way.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I wonder, how will the not so polite commenters from back then feel seeing this.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Since they were inpolite to a sensitive matter like suicide b4 doupt they would be now, in my mind i would never joke at a post like that i would try either to help if i can think something smart or try to avoid saying any just not to make things worse, in any case if someone made a joke cause he thought someone was just trolling i hope he never finds out and feel like he is somewhat responsible when lets face facts he cant be hold responsible

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's always easy to judge other people, judge yourself. I'd most likely act the similar way like them because I wouldn't believe that the guy is actually serious. Thing is, when I'm not sure or I feel like my response can have negative outcome, I sometimes write a very long comment just to eventually hit "cancel". It works, my mind is satisfied with the response I wrote, but noone else can see it.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's more of trying to explain to who I'm referring rather than judging. I judge my self every single day more and harsher than I judge anyone else, if any.
How you act and what you say it's not my business. I'm pretty sure that they didn't believe he was serious either. That's why I'm interested to know how this people would feel knowing the outcome of a story they included them self's in. Just out of curiosity.
If I knew they meant it, well there is nothing to be curious about in that.

By saying included them self's in, I don't mean they had any impact on the outcome of the story. If that was a movie, the best part I would give them would be, the random guy the protagonist walks into while he's walking with the head down. But I see them more as the people who randomly walk in the background in a movie and all you hear is a mumble while they cross the frame.
When someone actually proceeds to do something like this, his mind was already too deep to be able to come out or go any deeper from some random Internet comments. At least this is what I think, I'm not an expert.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Very saddening...

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

the internet is a harsh place, not for the faint hearted. if this is true then its very very sad but its not the fault of any of any online community. as sad and bad as it may sound people make their own choices in life for good or bad, help is available for people who need it but they have to reach out for it or there is nothing society can do.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He did reach out though. He even followed the help he was given where it was met with sarcasm and disbelief. If the community he enjoyed and put his trust in couldn't help him he might have thought anywhere else might have been pointless.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

if you have suicidal thoughts or suffer from depression that causes suicidal thoughts internet communities are NOT the place to seek help.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I am sure everyone who made sure to brush him off or give him a sarcastic line was thinking like you. It doesn't matter if you or I think that the internet is not for it, he thought it was because he had a connection for some reason. Logic does not apply the same when you are in that kind of condition.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

ok i suppose you may have a point, im a lot older than the person in question and in that respect im more connected to the 'real' world than most of todays youth who think the web holds the solutions to all of lifes problems.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

To some people the online world is just as real as the connections some of us have outside of it. Not everyone has friends to turn to and a lot of youth don't know how to talk to their parents about something like this and vice versa. I don't know enough about the guy to get further into the ifs and whys he did or didn't.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think it's completely irrelevant whether it is online or not. The point is this and other places on the internet may have been the only places he could talk about these things, or at least where he felt comfortable talking about such things.

Dismissing internet communities as "not real" is ridiculous. I'm willing to bet a lot of your communications are via your mobile and text/email. What difference is the internet. It is one of the most sophisticated forms of communication we have. It is the masses of people acting like children that are at fault, not the internet itself.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There is one called Samaritans I tried them once.. twice actually.
It's good for the ones who may feel better (mostly temporarily) by just writing.. and maybe the things they say might help them too!
(Although it irked me but I know someone who finds such things (the way they talk) helpful.. such things usually have the reverse effect on me (motivational things) )

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Seeing the articles and the posts and the video that was connected with the suicide made me so sad and it makes you think that you rather feed the trolls and maybe help 1 in 100 people that are serius about those stuff rather than treat something like that with a joke maybe he wouldnt have jumped if someone really took the time to convice him to talk to his parents , btw i wonder if you are a parent cant you see your kid is not ok wonder how they feel

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This could be the base of an interesting debate, since what could be better: risk the (let's say, even though I'd add at least two zeroes) 1:100 chance that the kid is actually telling the truth and help him to, well, either grow the fuck up or deal with some actual problem he is hiding behind internet dramaposting, or feed the other 99 trolls and help them grow up knowing they can just lie their way through life because there is always someone who'll believe them and give them what they want. (Although my cynical side says that there are enough Republican party members there already.)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

We may just need to take seriously posts like i am gonna suicide or i am gonna kill poeple because you never know hwne you actually replying to a troubled person but certaintly dont feed trolls on matters like omg this game sucks so much i am gonna delete my steam account and throw my computer at sea Maybe the topic could be cases we all should feed the trolls

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's hard to tell when one, especially teenager, is being serious, and when he's just angry at whole world because reasons. I always change my mind when I see some crucial words such as "suicide", "kill myself", "kill" in general etc. People usually understand those words quite well, and you're unlikely to raise argument such as "I'll kill myself" when angry. I remember myself as a teenager and I often used phrases such as "I hate you" or "I'll run away from home and you'll never find me", but I never actually considered saying something about suicide, even when I was really angry/disappointed. Maybe some people just can't understand how important the life is, even in such case, I'm not a psychologist to know how to deal with such people. What one can do, is taking case more serious, but I'd definitely not blame myself for suicide of that guy, even if I posted in that thread, because it was his decision and I'm more than sure that he understood what he's doing, at least I hope so, because silly death is the worst one.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I guess I am weird to think "He managed to get rid of all his troubles".
I believe it takes a lot of courage to actually manage to kill yourself...
It's hard to get better by just talking to one person, I mean the most common treatment (not sure if I should call it that) is going to a psychiatrist.. who is a total stranger to you, why would feel like telling everything to him? If you tell your loved one(s), first of all, although they won't make fun of you.. they might not understand it so you will need to put more work into it. They would obviously suggest going to a doctor and there will be people around nar the psychiatrist. (Although the session would be private). And (s)he probably sucks, it's hard to find a good one.

Sorry, I am really bad at expressing my thoughts =x

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's not really that hard, one only has to be desperate enough so that one doesn't care enough about the consequences, not as much as getting out of their current predicament. If that sounds like a joke, I believe most people are fairly aware they're going to send others into the gutter as a result of their taking their own life. So it's like saying, "well of course this is terrible terrible terrible, but I just can't take one tiny bit more" - it's not courage, it's desperation.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I see :/

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not that hard? The one thing that every living thing has in common is a will to survive. To end your own life is to go against nature itself. Our genetic programming strives to survive, so to go against that is a pretty major thing. After all, our existence is our most precious possession. To give that up must actually be the hardest thing you could do. Honestly, what could be harder?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What could be harder? for a parent, losing a child. For someone else, a loved one. For others still, failing to protect their family or country, regardless that it will surely cost their lives. Plenty of people have willingly given their own life to try and save a stranger, without so much of a thought or a moment of hesitation.

Humans, despite having an instinctual basis, are not machines that can only follow a program, a person can willingly sacrifice their own life when faced with the prospect of a loss that is perceived as greater.

Plenty of examples of the self-preservation instinct being cast aside, nothing of that has much to do with courage IMO ( I find it to be kind of a hollow word TBH), and for the depressed person, it has everything to do with pain.

The tone and wording of my post was meant to point out how much of an overriding force major depression may be, also that people experiencing it, to the point they're seriously considering ending their life, with which I mean, committing to the act fully, not just as a means to call for help, do really find themselves in such a dark place that the hopelessness, pain and exhaustion they experiment appear to them as an unsurmountable problem, the pain and suffering and struggle are just so intense - in most instances, however, to commit suicide require a certain degree of inner peace and cool mindedness, which the depressed person, who is able to successfully commit suicide, often finds in the moment the decision is made.

Also let's not talk about things like "nature" or "the natural order of things" because that is a cultural construct that inevitably leads to some really atrocious places.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I agree courage is not an appropriate word, all I was arguing was it "not being hard". If it wasn't hard, DNA and life in general would have failed. Fear of death is essentially what keeps everything going.

And our DNA is biological programming. Although you wouldn't ever call any animal a machine, we all still have an innate programming that guides us. Sure, we can go against it, but it is still the overall thing that guides us for the most fundamental tasks - surviving and reproducing.

And I'm not sure what cultural construct "nature" you are referring to? Maybe what I wrote didn't read as intended, but I wasn't relating to natural selection or whatever else you may have suspected. I was purely saying there is nature's programming within us all. It is essential to all life. Suicide happens in animals too, as does animals sacrificing their lives to save another's. I wasn't arguing that. Anything and anyone can go against nature, but it is hard wired into us all to not do so. It takes extreme circumstances (or at least in the view of the individual) to reach the decision to go against instinct, hence why I was saying it is by no means "not hard".

I just felt calling suicide "not hard" was pretty insensitive and undermining of people that feel that way. I can't imagine many take such a decision lightly and often seems to come after years of torment. If that doesn't highlight how difficult it is, then I don't know what would.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The tone is supposed to be wry and yes, it takes a great deal of suffering to take that step, like I said, I do feel, however, people who are not familiar with major depression and suicidal tendencies sometimes struggle to truly appreciate how delicate the scale is and what little it takes to tip it, which is why I wrote that post the way it is.

As for the rest - DNA can be likened to machine code, yeah, but it's code that can only build biological structures: while one could argue everything, even pure, abstract logical or mathematical reason ultimately stems from biological processes, there is a complex interplay and a great deal of factors determining human behaviors.

To make an example: in Japan, until not very long ago, old people were simply supposed to take their own lives when they reached a certain age. We're not talking about depressed people, just regular people that happened to have become older than some; the societal norm was so overriding of anything else, that it was simply accepted as a matter of fact by young, not so young, and old people alike. If genetics were really that strong or prevalent, don't you think something like that wouldn't be possible?

To go back to one of your examples, procreation - there actually isn't a true instinct to reproduce. We do find sex pleasurable though, which was the main driver for a lot of births, in not so distant times, when contraception and sex ed weren't that popular (well in a remarkable portion of the world that still is the case, unfortunately), and that we find it so pleasurable it's obviously a useful adaptation - but it's not an instinct that reproduction directly, it's not like "oh gosh I really feel like having a kid in 9 months" :) We do have paternal or maternal instincts (well, seemingly, not everyone does) or inclination, if you want, but even those can, in many instances, be satisfied otherwise.

There are innate mechanisms that are part of self-preservation, i.e. if a person suffering from clinical depression slips in the shower, they will still brace for impact, trying to minimize damage. It's not going to be triggered in, or help, someone who's a step ahead from the rail track though.

As for "nature" I meant, like I said, "the natural order of things". Natural selection, as in, the mechanism promoting traits that favor survivability, greater environmental and reproductive effectiveness and success, and so on, (and conversely, de-emphasizing traits that are useless or detrimental) that is actually an observable phenomenon, not a cultural construct.

It's an interesting topic of discussion, because it doesn't always work as expected... e.g. there are a number of adaptations that we consider detrimental now, that are believed to have been useful in the past, and we still can't get rid of them because the rate of evolution in a species as long-lived as humans is, on average, very, very slow.

Something else that you might find interesting, is that there is cool research linking some types of "moral behaviors" to evolutionary paths.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah that is a fair post. Some good points. However I would definitely argue some of it :)

There is enough evidence to point out how DNA/genetics do more than just build our bodies, they also have a huge bearing on our behaviours, and the behaviour of all animals. Instinct/genetic memory is the most obvious form. Just observing animals is enough to support this, when they know how to act when faced with certain situations, even though they couldn't possibly have "learnt" it in the traditional sense. More specifically, in humans we have a very tribal/pack mentality (which is the root cause of why things like patriotism and racism exist). This is something undoubtedly inherited from our great ape ancestors, who also used the same societies to improve their odds of survival. We know this as the likes of the Chimpanzee still do this today (and it's remarkable how closely their societies parallel our own). Of course, like you say, environmental and other factors build a human's behaviour. But we shouldn't forget about how much of our behaviour is formed by our genetic code. I think, being human and rather egotistical, we like to believe we are the ones that shape our lives and have control. Whereas in reality, much of how we act and react is based on our genetic code.

And I would argue reproduction is the overwhelming instinct of all animals. Pleasure is simply a means of driving that instinct further. And the idea of instincts doesn't really involve "oh gosh I really feel like having a kid in 9 months". It's something that's just done, the individual may not be fully aware of the consequences to know that they should do something. Take a new born animal for example. It can't possibly know what death is, yet it will still hide and flee from what it deems to be danger. Again, it's genetic programming telling the animal to do something, even though it may not know the full extent why it should (it cannot 'know' death from it's own experiences of the world). Same goes for humans and reproducing. I believe pleasure plays a part, but the overriding factor is an innate drive to reproduce, even if they are not fully conscious of the consequences that brings. Again, it's like teenagers suddenly getting a sex drive during puberty yet never having experienced sexual acts so they cannot possibly know of the pleasure that comes with it. It's just nature's way of directing us to reproduce. The fact that sexual maturity also unleashes these chemicals that drive the want/need for sex goes to show it is "in nature's plan" (i.e. genetic) and not the individual's decision. We want and have sex because our genetics guide us to do so, through chemicals, behaviours, etc.

Of course in modern society with things like contraception a huge portion of the population have sex seemingly for solely pleasure. However remember contraception is not part of nature's equation (it has only been used widespread for a century or so, nowhere near long enough for this to be addresses in our genetic code). That drive to have sex is still there regardless of whether contraception is used or not. Just because someone is knowingly having sex with contraception doesn't mean that person's instincts/genetics are not still guiding them to have sex in the first place. Because at the end of the day that act of sex is to reproduce (that all our genetic code cares about). Our DNA formed our bodies so it would be pleasurable, but it's still a simple process of getting us to reproduce to diversify and strengthen the species, which is instructed by our instincts.

As for the adaptations, are you referring to things like the coccyx and the appendix? If so, they are relics from much farther ago than the human race. The appendix is for breaking down cellulose, which is handy when you eat grass. I'm not sure even our great ape ancestors would have eaten grass so I'd guess that's from even further back (will have to check that). And I'm not certain when we lost the tail, but the coccyx is the remnant of that. Like you said, evolution is reliant on generations, and if one generation is long living (from our point of view) then it will take a long time to view adaptations (and eventually evolution). That's why mice are used for so much in genetics, because you have see adaptations so quickly because of their short lifespan.

Sorry I probably wrote to much

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Suicide doesn't take a lot of courage.

Deciding to face the demons, get help, and live on through a seemingly hopeless situation takes courage.

Suicide is resigning to give up fighting, in the face of what the victim believes is a situation that has no positive outcome.

Something being difficult and requiring courage are not the same.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No, you're not weird. Suicide seems like a way out of problems if you suffer from depression. I don't think it is courageous though... Living requires far more courage, especially when you see no point in it.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

in my opinion suicide can be seen as the easy way out. In the end, we die anyways so one can argue it doesn't really matter. One just needs to be convinced enough about it, and have the courage or cowardice for it. The main obstacle is to decide how the deed should be done, for there are "safer", faster, and "cleaner" ways to go than others.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just remember the Internet is a shit place if you make it so and that includes letting others make it shitty ...exactly like the real world.

/pearls of wisdom fish'll be off now...

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yep. he really commited that

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

some facts from that thread:

~40 users replied

18 were mean/rude,
from those 18, 12 are leeches,
and from those 12, 1 is permabanned.

i'm also sad to see some familiar faces there being so insensitive, like a lv10 user and someone that was praised for posting gifs.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I was comparing the ratio of hostile comments to neutral and helpful as well. I didn't keep an exact count like you did though. I hadn't thought to check their stats either, but I did check to see if any of them were still active. Most were, with a few not having logged in within the past 4-6 months. Not that that makes any difference, really.

View attached image.
8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

To be fair, plenty of people seek attention writing stuff like that and then they never do anything about it. It's even harder to take the person seriously writing about ragequitting The Binding of Isaac, it just looks like another one of those whiny kids having a tantrum and you can never know which one is going to kill himself out of the hundred that are just venting. Hell, I know a person that threatens with suicide on a daily basis and making life miserable for everyone else, she even hurt herself a couple of times to show she's "serious", but it's just empty threats to make people do whatever she wants. You might say being supportive and etc is the key, but she has been depressed and on meds for years now and she's still the same annoying manipulative attention seeking girl with rage tantrums when she doesn't get what she wants and what she wants is unreasonable, selfish and childish. She's acting like an angst-y teen since she was a teen and she's 24 already.

The point is, it's impossible to know when you need to take the post seriously, once the person kills himself everyone has to feel bad for making fun of him or not helping him in some way, but the person that does do it is a selfish person that has no regard for anyone around him and you never know what exactly might help the person or if anything can help at all. This isn't comfortable for me to tell, but I'll be honest and say that I have made a similar post myself around 12 years ago and I was serious about it and people did make fun of me, but I didn't go through with it, because it was a plain stupid thing to do and those people didn't affect anything, it was more of a vent post after which I started thinking what method to kill myself with.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think using one example with that female to show how all suicidal people are is a little silly. We are all very different, even people with such dark thoughts. Everyone will express it differently so it's best not to rush to conclusions or associate them with someone else you knew. That's basically the recipe for discrimination right there "I knew one person that was this way, so all people like that must be the same".

And to call suicidal people selfish is very insensitive, and way off the mark. Often they don't actually have anyone in their lives, or at least anyone who legitimately cares. And at the end of the day, it's your life to control. We all make choices that shape our lives, whether we don't try hard at school or end up working a job we hate for 40 years. You are the one that controls your life and you make the ultimate choices. That's the beauty of being a free human being. I don't see it as selfishness at all.

I'm sorry to hear about what you went through.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I didn't say that the girl was the prime example of what all suicidal people are like, but it is an example of an attention seeker that is just using that to manipulate people around him. You never know who is behind the screen, it could be an actual suicidal person or an attention seeker and from the looks of it, there are more of those around, so people find it harder to take every case that pops up seriously.

As far as selfishness goes, this extends beyond just people close to you, when a person goes to jump under a train, it puts a ton of people into a bad situation, whether they're in a hurry somewhere and gonna be late due to the train stopping to clear things out or just get upset upon hearing that their train just killed a guy. A bunch of people have to start working to get rid of the person's remains and it can affect dozens, if not hundreds, of lives. Later the government will have to pass laws and start working on new security measures to prevent people from getting onto the tracks, which are useless if the person is determined to get to the other side, but they still waste government money and manpower on it. You don't understand the extent of your actions until you've been on the other side of it. So yeah, I'd say it is selfish to jump under a train, no matter how much trouble you're having with your life, but then again those people wouldn't know how much of a burden they're actually creating by doing that. There are plenty of less public ways to end yourself and not be a bother to a lot of people.

Eitherway I don't mean to insult those people, emotional issues are difficult to handle and it's never a good thing. It's hard to think about anyone else when all you can think about is how bad your own life is and how much you want to end it.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah my point was just it's bad to jump the gun and think a person could be "faking it" and is just an attention seeker. If you go into a situation like this with that attitude it can have dire consequences. Better to run with it until you know for certain I feel. If you treat an actual suicidal person with contempt and undermine them because you think they are just looking for attention, it's only going to do harm. Not worth it in my eyes. Obviously you have personal experience of someone using this to get attention (which is incredibly immature and damaging to people who really have these problems). I was just saying I hope that one case doesn't effect your opinion of the matter in general. In my eyes, it's better to be made a fool and believe someone's insincere cries for help than ignore everything and potentially miss a legitimate plea for help.

Yeah I totally agree with you on the train situation. It's something I don't understand (like you say, it effects so many others lives) and I can't imagine it is the nicest way to go. Especially in the modern day where, if you are so inclined, you could get a bottle of gas off the internet for not much money at all which will send you to sleep, then unconscious, and then kill you peacefully with absolutely no pain. I was more meaning the act of suicide isn't selfish (I feel) not necessarily the way in which it's carried out.

I don't think you insulted anyone, it's just such a delicate subject.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's evident that you aren't familiar with suicide and depression at any intimate level, or at least haven't been informed about it in any significant capacity. If that wasn't true, you wouldn't be describing suicidal behaviors (and suicide) as "selfish", which is a widely debunked myth about depression and suicide founded in ignorance about both.

What you're describing about that suicidal girl you know are coping mechanisms, her verbal "vent posts" so-to-speak. Is she being manipulative and using suicidal threats as a means of convincing others to do things for her? Perhaps, and it honestly wouldn't surprise me. When I was depressed and suicidal, I concocted a story about me dying, presumably from some degenerative condition, and allowed the rumor to be spread throughout the school I attended in order to gain sympathy. Eventually, people realized that it was bullshit, but I maintained that lie because the sympathy I received from others helped me cope with the stresses and struggles I was experiencing.

Such tactics are completely out of character for me now, after years of maturation, but I nevertheless employed them when I was younger because I lacked an adequate support system to help me cope and doing that provided a temporary relief that staved off the overwhelming stress that the suicidal thoughts exerted on my life. For those very reasons, I also used to threaten suicide when I was younger, even though I secretly knew that I lacked the courage to actually commit suicide: the responses to those threats helped me cope with the internal suffering I was experiencing every day. This is a behavior that my ex-fiancée demonstrated, as well, though she actually harmed herself and placed herself in life-threatening situations, activities I never did; the solution was to provide adequate support for her, which then caused those threats and behaviors to subside.

In a similar fashion, the girl you know almost certainly threatens to commit suicide because she lacks an adequate enough support system to provide her with sufficient assistance. If that assistance was provided, the suicidal threats and manipulative behaviors would subside because she would no longer need to employ those tactics as means of coping with her depression. While it's entirely possible that she's actually just sociopathic and employs such tactics to exploit others, the fact that she has a substantial history of depression and medication use for that very condition heavily undermines the credibility of that being true. The more likely scenario is the one I described above, the scenario that I personally know and which is common among depressed and suicidal people. So yes, being supportive is key and your dismissive attitude toward her depression actually implies a lack of empathy on your behalf.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm not being dismissive, I'm not close enough to her to care about her, even though for the period that I was close to her, I did my best to be as supportive and helpful as I could, but from what I've seen she's surrounded by caring, patient people and friends, her boyfriend is extremely patient and loving and she still takes it all for granted, she still kept complaining and whining and doing everything in her power to sabotage anything she could. What you say might be true to you and I don't know how long it took you, but this girl has been keeping this up for years now and she keeps abusing it all the time.

She keeps craving attention and tries to attract it in any way possible, one time she put a ton of black make up, dressed in all black and looked like a goth and came like that to some normal social event. Then when she got her attention she immediately started having a tantrum over people treating her like a freak even though she clearly was the only one standing out in the crowd(it was kids that started saying stuff about her though, not the adults). I'm certain that she does have a suicidal tendency, but from all the time that she got used to people doing stuff for her over the suicide threats, I think she just got used to it and doesn't want it to change. A while ago she had a case when she went to sleep during the day and the phone was off, so her parents drove all the way to her house and started knocking on the door in panic because she wasn't available for a couple of hours, just so you understand the level of worrying that people have towards her and how much trouble she is.

And as I said before, I didn't say that suicide itself is selfish, it's selfish when it turns into a bother for a big public, like jumping under a train.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why does your concern for the welfare of others only extend as far as your proximity to them?

I don't know why this friend of yours apparently continues to behave that way. It could be that there are underlying problems that are preventing her from abandoning those coping mechanisms, such as a fear that people will stop providing her with the support she's receiving if she changes her behavior; or perhaps she has developed an interest in those behaviors outside of their capacity of being coping mechanism, such as believing that continuing those manipulative behaviors personally benefit her (which may be caused by another condition or mental disorder). It's also entirely possible that the problem lies in your perception of her. For example, if could be that you are mistaking her attitude as being complaining and whiny when in reality, you are simply accustomed to viewing her in that way and have failed to notice the behavioral changes she has made, perhaps in part due to the estrangement you described.

The scenario you described honestly sounds like a coping mechanism. She is deliberately setting herself up for attention, any attention (even ridicule), because it makes her feel like she matters. A common feeling that many depressed people experience, myself included, is one of being socially nonexistent, which often translates into a feeling of social isolation. She may feel like people don't notice her, or acknowledge her existence, so she has to perform actions and behave in ways that deliberately court the attention of others. It doesn't matter whether people actually do notice and acknowledge her presence, or even engages in open conversation with her; what matters is the internal narrative that she is telling herself—a narrative that is often discordant with reality.

Alternatively, that could simply be a sign of manipulative behaviors related to any number of other conditions. I'm definitely not even close to qualified to provide an accurate diagnosis, nor would a diagnosis be possible with the scant information you provided. Your best bet is to report these observations to a licensed psychologist and see what they have to say, preferably multiple licensed psychologists for multiple opinions and preferably ones that are familiar with her and her case.

And as I said before, I didn't say that suicide itself is selfish, it's selfish when it turns into a bother for a big public, like jumping under a train.

So, the circumstances of one's suicide determine the motives of the actor?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'll just say this -- whether or not someone is doing something like that to get attention, it's never worth taking the chance. Attention is easily given and the most valuable thing you can give to someone else. Who cares if you're only indulging someone's hunger for attention? To me it's not worth denying it in case it's the one time when someone really truly needs that attention.

And it doesn't take very much, sometimes. One smile, one kind gesture, or even just a few moments of your time can change absolutely everything for someone. I know. :)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I really don't understand why people respond to posts like that by mocking or telling the person to kill themselves. If they think it's a troll or attention seeker, wouldn't getting attention be just what they want? And if it is an actual suicidal person, you most likely just made the situation worse.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Most of them probably don't care. I'm sure most of them have their own problems and that could be them just dealing with them, by mocking other people. The world today is a messed up place, even though you might not want to realize it or not. It's probably another reason I don't get out much or watch the news as much, I like to think it's not as messed up as it is... but the truth hurts.

I have problems of my own and I'm sure I've said plenty of inappropriate things (I tend to be a troll at times) and who knows why I do it, but I would never say anything troll-like on a post like that, and if I have ever offended anyone here with my troll-like behavior, I apologize. I normally only joke with people that I know can take a joke and as long as it's not racist or intentionally rude.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

174 hours in isaac is pretty impressive though.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You really had to post this? Now, I've combined his probable suicide with steamgifts. And I really don't want to read the comments there, in order to avoid seeing any stupid troll comments. Whoever trolls in situations like this, should seriously have to get hit repeatedly. Trolls like these are common degenerates.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 8 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

wut? are you retarded?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well... sucks for his parents and/or whoever loved him, but in general, I believe a person can do whatever he wants, and if you look at it from his side, his life must have sucked (in his opinion at least), so it was actually a positive change to him.
The community though... I don't know, I personally would have ignored the thread probably.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"...so it was actually a positive change to him."

So suicide is a good thing now ? wow, I missed something. Look at this guy and ask yourself why he didn't want to commit suicide:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36m1o-tM05g

I'm mistaken maybe, but I don't think his life sucks more than Sam's life.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Let's say a person's life quality can go from -10 to +10. Death is 0. If he rated his life a -10, then yes, it was positive to him.
How much a life of a person sucks and what is he going to do about it, is pretty much his own subjective thing, and not my or anyone else's thing to argue.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Now this is a cold, mathematic and unnecessarily logical. True, our own lives are our matters. But when somebody reaches out for help you are to give it, not to say "well you should do whatever you feel like, after-all it's your life. Since your life sucks, death is going to be good. Good fucking riddance yo". What the heck.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I wouldn't say that, even though I'd think that. I mean I can't be sure his life is a -10 for real, and not a +something with a -10 moment without knowing the person. But if a person is seriously depressed and has been so all their life, and nothing helped, it would probably be better to end the suffering.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

So instead of suffering 16 years, you'd make a teenager suffer possibly 60+ years more?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just because the first 16 years of someone's life has been lousy, that means that their entire life is destined to be that way? There is almost always hope that things can get better. But if you end it then your life hasn't improved, it's just over.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

0 is still improvement from -10. And no, people just don't miraculously get over from deep depression. And after all it's only their choice. If they find the struggle too much of a pain to wait and see if things get better, it's their every right to end it.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Some people live their whole life between -10 and -5 state, and the -5 state is on meds, aka "treated". Not all people can be truly happy.
Wouldn't you feel at least a little selfish and guilty if a person is looking at you with wet eyes and begging "please let me just die, I can't take this torture anymore" but you keep him in straitjacket, stuffing his mouth with pills hoping he will be healthy?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If that guy was completely sane and knew about his situation, for example because he'd suffer from some physical pain, and there was no way to help him, according to doctors that are experts in the pain he's suffering from, yes, I'd consider helping him to commit suicide.

However, there was DEFINITELY help available for that kid, because he was simply suffering from depression, not any inner body pain. His situation was better than many suffering people in DPRK's death camps, yet those people do not commit suicide, because they want to live, even though they're suffering physical and non-physical pain on daily basis.

So no, if I was actually talking with that kid, I would do whatever I can to not let him kill himself, because for sure somebody more experienced than me (e.g. a good psychologist) could help him to deal with all of his problems, and explain to him that his life is the most precious thing he has.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It is my personal -- and I stress personal -- belief that those who take their own lives sometimes see things much more clearly. I also think that suicide is mostly an act of courage, rather than cowardice.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"those who take their own lives sometimes see things much more clearly."

I'm curious, did you met someone who can confirms that? I mean someone who came back to life after he committed suicide and told you:

Man, you should really commit suicide, my life is so much better now!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

those who think about taking their own lives sometimes see things much more clearly.

he probably meant that, and in my case it's pretty accurate.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, it's not black and white, but most of times suicide is nothing more than running away from problems.
Sometimes problems can be too great (like, for example, some terminal sickness), but other times they only look too big and could be resolved with some work.

Sometimes it's much easier to eat some pills or close eyes and jump than wake up every day and try to life.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

oh my.. :(

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

happy cake day! To make it a happy one, may i suggest visiting more light hearted topic :D

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't think I was a member of steamgifts back when that thread was made, either way I've never seen it before.

I do have to say that even if I did see the thread, I don't think I'd take him seriously. The guy talks about Binding of Isaac and how the game gets him to feel sad and enraged and how he wants to kill himself ever since he started playing it. That sounds like a poor attempt at trolling or trying to get getting some attention, Of course that doesn't means I'd make fun of him, when it comes to something like suicide posts if I'm not sure are they real or not I rather stay out of it.

I think that if he, instead of mentioning that game told people what really troubles him, more people would take him seriously and offer their support.

I don't feel sorry for him though, mostly due to suicide method he chose I consider him a selfish asshole. He threw himself in front of a train, not thinking about the operator of the train and the passengers and how they will feel when they see his dead body. Things like that can cause mental trauma for people, especially kids who were in the train. I know he was young and immature, unreasonable as well otherwise he wouldn't consider suicide as an option, but still... being immature and unreasonable doesn't justify someones actions.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 year ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In the end it's a game. It shouldn't be taken seriously. Especially since it's not a realistic game, it's filled with christian mythology and other things that don't exist.

This is what that kid posted on reddit:

The game is right, There is NO FUCKING HOPE, NO FAITH, NO FUTURE! So why not? Suicide over game is sound off but it what I do.

Instead of taking real-life examples, he starts believing that there's no hope and future for him because of a game. That's really stupid, there's a difference between games and real life, and you have to be braindead not to realize that. Even if you're severely depressed you should have at least a tiny bit of reason left in you to realize that games and what happens in them don't have anything to do with the real world.

There are so many real-life story examples of people who managed to overcome their shitty lives and accomplish something. That's what he should have focused on, instead of what happens in a game. Those examples are what made me decide that suicide will never be an option for me and that I should keep on patiently waiting until I get the chance to turn my life around.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 year ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's one of the work requirements of train drivers, I've heard. They must be ready for this, because in a long career of train driving, there will be at least couple of things like this happening. I didn't mention it in my post though, because I realized there are like no methods that wouldn't cause anyone to deal with your dead body. Like even if he chose not the train, there would still be ambulance workers seeing it all.
The passengers probably don't even see it though, I mean it's not like a train would give a bleep about a soft body. Who knows, maybe they even felt a little bump, but if it wasn't close to a station, I doubt anyone else than the train driver and body-collecting crew saw him there.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well the medical people are used to seeing dead people. Anyway the operator probably noticed the train hit someone and stopped the train, and if the passengers went out at that point they would probably see a dismembered body. At least that's what I imagine happens in those situations, I'm no expert. Perhaps the train keeps on going until it reaches the destination.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No, no. This thing never happens. It's a daily life for them (train drivers), there's nothing they can do once it happens, and their train has a place to be/schedule to follow. They don't stop.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The incident closed the station, and a bus bridge was set up until it reopened just after 8 a.m.

They did stop.

In here, cases like that make the news every other day, and the trains always stop, much to the despair of thousands of commuters.

I have been told by some freight train conductors in inhospitable areas they don't stop for cows or horses... but to run over a person and simply ignore it, that would be a criminal act in most countries.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Oh, okay so he did it close to a station. Which is quite stupid already. If I'd do it, I'd pick a place between stations, because bigger speeds and also less anxiety-inducing stuff like people. Would like to go at least a little bit peacefully, as much as it's possible with a train.
At least in my country it seems to be more popular to do it between stations, and in that case the trains don't stop.
Not saying they have to ignore it, but you realize it takes a lot to stop a full speed train, and there's not much they can do anyway, it's not train driver's job to scrape some remains from the railroad. I'd assume he would just call somewhere and tell what and where happened.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's not his job to scrape the remains, and it's not what they do in those cases. I think the reason why they have to stop the train is to go and check if the person managed to survive, which actually does happen in some cases.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Wouldn't it be faster and more convenient to call an ambulance? Because stopping a train takes half a mile or up to mile if it's a big train, while ambulance can arrive in few minutes anyway, and are actually made for that. And doesn't make lots of people wait, or the train miss its schedule. I don't know. That's how I'd do it if I was the ruler of the world.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How long it takes for ambulance to arrive really depends on the situation. It depends on the distance between them and the "accident" and are they available to take on that job in the moment of the call (there isn't an unlimited number of staff and vehicles after all).

Sometimes it's probably faster for the train conductor to get back to the "victim" then it is for the ambulance. In cases like these the human life is considered more valuable than the train schedule. Personally I only agree with that point of view if the person got hit by the train on accident and I disagree with that point of view in the case of attempted suicide.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Weird tho, I actually googled it and it seems many do stop. And at the same time it says a train takes like half a mile to stop if not more, if it has lots of wagons. It seems like a totally backwards practice, I mean the person is 99.9% dead, and the train has a schedule, and the people in train will panic or feel bad when they know what happened... I don't know, it would make more sense that the train would go on but call somewhere.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I may be horrible person, but somehow your version of train suicides/accidents makes me laugh. I know it's morbid, but I just have this image in my mind of train drivers being like "omg, not this shit again :< ain't nobody has time for that, I have my schedule!" and then they continue journey with 0 fucks given.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah well, apparently not true, at least not in all cases. But it would make much more sense like that.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In pragmatic sense you're probably right, but I don't think train driver would be composed enough to react like that. Most people would instinctively try to stop as soon as they've realized what's happening. (even if it's illogical reaction)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

logical thinking to control your emotions

If only people came with a button to control their negative emotions and help them think more clearly.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It almost sounds like you don't suffer from mental illness.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm saying that since you clearly don't suffer from mental illness, you shouldn't be pretending to understand the experiences of people who do. Saying that someone with severe, suicidal depression should have maintained "logical control of their emotions" is really shitty, plain and simple. Not having "logical control of your emotions" or even emotions that are "logical" for your situation is a sign and symptom of mental illness. And looking down your nose at him because he didn't follow your method...well what's even the point of that?

I know you suffixed it with "Just my view," but when we're talking about a kid who killed himself, this is not a good place for your totally uninformed advice. I know you probably meant well, but sometimes you just shouldn't spout off about things you know nothing about.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Your advice is incorrect and can be downright harmful.

Since you apparently haven't guessed, I've been in Delgado's position before. Everyone is different, but things that helped me were validation of my emotions ("I understand you feel that way," instead of "You shouldn't feel that way because..."), therapy and medications. Platitudes like "Look on the bright side!" might help if someone is just feeling sad, but depression is not the same thing as just being in a really bad mood. They only made me feel worse, and I've spoken to plenty of people with similar experiences. Again, you know nothing about this, and I don't think you realize how insulting you're being.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I really can't articulate everything that's wrong with what you just said right now. So I'm just going to ask you with complete sincerity, to please do some research before you try to speak authoritatively on such a sensitive subject in the future. Not knowing what to do or say is fine, but making it up can really hurt people. I'm not the only person pointing out that you're ignorant on this subject. Please take this opportunity to learn.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You don't know when depression comes. Most of the time you don't realize until you already have depression. And it is pretty much impossible for a person who never was depressed to understand a person with depression (I'm not even talking about more serious ilnesses like schitzophrenia etc). Without any help from aside it's almost impossible to cope with it yourself.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I can't answer that question because I don't really know.

As for hobbies, the problem is that things that you were interested in before and things that made you happy - they simply don't interest you anymore. Everything seems pointless and empty. As I said earlir, it's pretty much impossible to understand a person with depression if you never had it.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There is a quote, "the opposite of depression isn't happiness, but vitality".

Not doing enough things that make your happy is practically never something that leads to depression. For starters, those things that once gave you pleasure often don't any more once you have depression.

I think you are writing this with good intentions, but sadness is not depression. And depression is not sadness. It is far more complex and deep-rooted issue than just that. Feeling sad and lonely at times is not abnormal in the slightest. Depression is often incessant and can last years (or even a lifetime) without a clear cause. Genetics can play a part, but even people in "perfect" lives surrounded by all their favourite things can have deep depression.

The fact that we don't really know how to treat depression just shows how complex and misunderstood it is. Therapy works sometimes, medication can work for some people, but we still know very little about it, it's causes, and how to successfully treat everyone of it.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Like others have said, depression is not merely feeling sad. Depression is a serious neurological and mental condition. The neurological part means that the functioning of the brain itself is broken in some way. That's something that can't be fixed with "happy thoughts" or whatever, any more than a broken leg can.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He posted on that reddit section, and they starts debatting about gramar and gramar nazis... but yeah, got your point

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you already commit yourself to suicide and want to jump in front of a train i think there is little logic left inside you, in such cases one needs help from anyone (cry for help), and if this seemed the closest place to be, might be why he chosen it, also considering it was around a game someone here might have understood that feeling.
Logic seems to google to search for help or call a hotline but i think there just isn't much logic left.

Even if all reactions were nice, helpful, caring he might as just well went through with it anyway, he did not stay long after he posted the things.

There are however also alot of trolls, and most thought he was just trolling, doubt this says anything about "maturity" about the whole community and it was just a sad incident.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 8 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 8 years ago.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sure, but there is difference between the real world and the Internet, where everyone could be an anonymous troll. In the latter people are used to ignoring something that is exaggerated (here it looked like a game was so enraging he wanted to commit a suicide), as it usually indicates trolling.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As a psychology major, your post annoys me because it's filled with things that are utterly inaccurate to both psychological and physiological facts about the workings of the human brain and psyche.

As an extremely intelligent, logical, and generally controlled person, your post annoys me because I can tell you that logical thinking does not CONTROL emotion at any level, and in fact emotions are much more likely control your logical thinking.

As a sufferer of depression, your post outright pisses me off, because you are one of the people that says things based not in any fact, but only in opinion, and state it in such a way as to make a severe psychological disorder WORSE.

Your emotions can color the "logic" of your thoughts very easily, and make things that seem wholly irrational perfectly reasonable to you. You basically engaged in "Victim Blaming" acting as if it is the fault of the person suffering from these psychological issues, rather than were the fault actually lies - with the psychological issue. It is no one's fault they suffer from any psychological issue, any more than it's someone's fault they suffer from the flu, a cold, or other disease/illness that is physical in nature. If someone catches the flu and is sick for a few days, or gets a severe infection and winds up in the hospital, etc, you don't just sit there and say "Well, gosh, if you'd just work on thinking logically that sure wouldn't have happened."

Many psychological disorders can NOT be controlled like that at all. Many of them stem from physical or chemical differences in the brain that cause it to misfire, trip incorrect signals, overload or underproduce different chemicals, etc, and all of these things can control thoughts, feelings, perceptions, etc. The whole world in which you live is a construct of your brain, and it is not necessarily representative of reality. For example: Did you know that in the center of your vision you are blind? When you look straight ahead and see a full picture, that is not real. You have no optical lenses directed at a small space in the exact front of your line of sight, but your brain takes information from the surrounding area and fills in the missing information based on the extrapolations it produces on the fly.
Take that example and imagine some mild defect in the portion of the brain that is responsible for processing that optical signal, and suddenly you have a source of visual defects, or say different types of color blindness, hallucinations, and so on and so forth. This is a pretty significant oversimplification, but I'm not intending to give a course lecture here...

The point is that you have very little control. The vast majority of what you do in a day is not consciously controlled, even though you think it is. We function in more ways than not on different styles of auto-pilot. And in fact, if you'd like to see another fantastic example, watch the Discovery News youtube video about Oujia boards, which covers the fact that you are actually moving things without being conscious of doing it, and that there are situations that even when you consciously believe yourself to be in control of things like fine and gross motor functions they are actually fully under the control of your subconscious.

Getting into dealing with actual emotional control: people are all wired a bit differently, and between genetics and environment, have different levels of coping mechanisms. One great example is Introversion versus extroversion. Most people believe Introverts to be "anti-social" and such, and think they lack social skills, and so on and so forth. Basically EVERYTHING about that is totally wrong. Introverts have a tendency to prefer to be alone, but it's not related to not being good with people, or the actual social aspects at all. The brains of introverted people (myself included) are physically and chemically different from the brains of extroverted people. Specifically, they are constantly at a higher state of arousal (we're not talking sexual arousal, FYI). Basically, an introverts brain has much higher arousal levels as a base pattern. The brain has an idea level, and the more additional stimulus added to that, the more it overwhelms the ability to process and mitigate. What that means is that for most actually introverted people, they are already at or above the optimal level of stimulus for the brain, and additional stimuli are processed exceptionally quickly, which, as it is continuously added, can become overwhelming very quickly. To give an analogue that I think perhaps is the most likely to be familiar to the widest group of people and make this understood, we'll talk sex for just a second. I can pretty safely assume most everyone reading has experienced an orgasm before, male or female. I'm assuming that most everyone that has, at some point also had some continued stimulus. Most people consider that sensation, as the same nerves become over stimulated, to be painful. Emotional regulation can be likened to that. In an introvert, they are by default, just shy of that metaphorical orgasm, thus achieve it quickly, and move into that overstimulated side quickly. So most introverts prefer to be in a situation that limits the amount of sensory information they have to process, limits the amount of emotional information and sympathetic emotional reactions, etc, so they do not become overwhelmed. Extroverts by contrast start off at a very low level of mental arousal, and so they require far more to hit the idea point for their brains to be happy and function best.

We deal with that topic in order to highlight how much emotional regulation can vary, though the continuum is far more vast than I have either the time or, honestly, experience and background to fully cover. However, moving over to the actual topic of depression, you can hopefully now begin to see exactly how much variation there is, and how little REAL control we have over the functions of our brain, and instead how much our brains control us. Logical thinking isn't going to change your brain misperceiving things, or misinterpreting things. A person suffering from depression is typically extremely logical and detail oriented about things. For example, real suicide notes almost never amount to the media stereotypes of melodramatic "Goodbye cruel world!" type BS. Often they are lists of things, such as "don't forget the groceries, and to feed the dog" type. Many sufferers of depression do worry about other people, and how they will react, etc. And sometimes that is HARMFUL, not HELPFUL. They already feel worthless, sad, guilty, hypercritical, etc... So what this does is feed right back in to the depression - Now they feel guilty for wanting to do something that might cause others pain, they are told it's selfish and weak, and so on, all things that shines even more negative light on the person, making them feel worse. Which then makes them feel worse. And worse. And worse. Ad infinitum. It is horrible to experience, and even worse still, very few people get the support they need. They instead are subjected to exactly this sort of idiocy which makes the situation worse, and they are expected to then "be better" or "feel better." Many fake it as best they can because they are trying so hard to live up to the expectation, meanwhile the lack of real support, feeling of aloneness and worthlessness eats away ever deeper, until some unfortunate few do actually take their own lives.

That DOES deserve sympathy, it DOES deserve understanding. And through both of these things, while you may never know it yourself through experience, you may learn enough to actually be helpful. Bring and end to the horrific stigmas over most of the world about mental health disorders so people don't feel they have to hide their problems, or hide FROM their problems, and are instead free to seek help without assuming that admitting the problem will be a new problem even worse than whatever they are already suffering.

At this point this is an utter wall of text and it's been something like 40 minutes of typing, so I'll simply leave it at this:
No two people can ever truly know each other's world, because no two people (even identical twins) have the same brains.
Understanding that the world is different to everyone, and that everyone's different brain functions are why will hopefully help people stop with the judgement and assumptions about reality, and maybe even gain a little knowledge about a topic before they decide to speak out on it.

An added bit here, having refreshed the page and seen your further comments: What you are talking about is NOT what is done by professional psychologists or psychiatrists, because it is typically harmful rather than helpful. Those are stereotypical phrases that could be called "advice" but are not actually giving helpful direction at all. The closest thing to what you're trying to get at is CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) which is a long term process where a professional psychologist continues to help a person break habitual maladaptive thought patterns by providing correction and guidance, WITHOUT JUDGEMENT, and offers emotional support through the journey. Examples of that are not ordinarily dealing with depression, as severe depression often stems from physical or chemical abnormalities in the brain. CBT is more used for things like Phobias than for depression. There's a reason why a lot of people with depression end up on medications. It has also been discovered over the last few years that one of the newest forms of electroconvulsive therapy more or less intially meant to treat seizure disorders like epilepsy can help with depression as well, which implies some depression issues in some people are stemming from the actual electrical signals of the brain misfiring as well.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'd like to think this really excellent post is what I might have written if I hadn't been awake for 24 straight hours.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Perhaps the issue is just the use of the word "logical" there. Logic is systemic reasoning adhering to certain guidelines that more or less determine an arguments validity, eg: "reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity" the first definition on Google.

So, to try to illustrate a chain of logical thinking from the standpoint of depression, I'll basically lay out a line of thoughts, directly in relation to your suggestion about them seeking help, and with the intent to show that people suffering from depression DO spend more of their time thinking, and they DO analyze it and then make their decision.

So you start with the premise that they should seek help, and that thinking and reasoning will direct them that way. But here's a series of perfectly valid, logical thoughts that instead lead a person to suicide instead of seeking help:

You say I should seek help. My life is painful. I continue to fail at everything I try to do. Everyone is disappointed in me. I have sought help in the past, and all they did was judge me and point out how I'm selfish and wrong. I hate the way I feel, I hate being like this. It's my fault I'm like this. Everyone hates dealing with my problems. I am bad, and wrong as a person. I have no value. If I was not around to cause these problems, everyone would be happier. The world would be better without me in it. Rather than seek help, just to fail again, I should kill myself to make the world a better place.

I could continue to list off perfectly valid, reasonable and logical premises like that for ages. I should know, I've done it thousands of times in my own head. Thankfully I have a number of people that care a great deal about me and have helped me, and a few of them struggle with their own issues enough to be better at not saying the most unhelpful things. But there's also the fact that I have to be incredibly thankful to my mother for the way she raised me - I'm one of the most stubborn people you'll ever meet, and I care so much about people that I find ways to will myself through the worst of it. Sometimes it's just a matter of trying to solve other people's problems so I can forget my own for a while. But sometimes, it's just simple willpower, I force myself through the day, sleep, and hope my mind is a bit better tomorrow. I find things that work for me from day to day - This website is one of them. Sometimes I'd find a great thread, other times I won something, sometimes I gave something away, but I'd focus on the little rewarding feelings and build on them. Part of how I even do that is because I studied psychology, and because of the kind of methodical, logical person I am. Other people are more emotionally based than I am, and others are more impulsive, etc. Just like no two people are alike, no two depressions will be either, and no two solutions to the problem will be.

For some, they can handle it themselves. Others need therapy. Still others need therapy and medication. Some have to be kept under constant supervision. Some need to have electrodes implanted into their brain and undergo mild regulatory shocks to reset something. And so on and so forth.

Depression can be totally logical and rational, even whilst seeming to people on the outside to be neither. It's all a matter of perception, about what is being thought about, and about how it's being judged. Part of the issue you need to keep in mind here too is that when you are judging the logic of it, you do so based on your perceptions of reality, but they are doing so based on theirs, and the perceptions can be wildly different. Most of us think from the perspective that the loss of the other person is the worst possible outcome, but in a lot of the people suffering from severe depression, they spend a lot of time thinking about how bad they feel, not knowing why, feeling helpless and unable to fix or control it, etc and have thought of so very many ways that it is NOT the worst possible outcome, and is actually the best.

People handle things very differently. This leads to a variety of things, like depression, or PTSD. PTSD is actually a great example to use, because two very similar people in the same situation can react in very drastically different ways. The example one of my professors gave in university was from his own life: He and his sister witnessed a pretty horrible and tragic event as children, visiting a family member in the hospital. The ex-husband of a person in the hospital was taking classes for a pilots license, and whilst piloting a small single engine plane, not in his right mind, deviated from the expected course, and flew the plane at the hospital building. It wasn't known whether he altered at the last second, or the flight instructor managed to gain control, but the plane was pulled up in time to avoid colliding with the building, but stalled and crashed into the lawn just off the parking lot. My professor and his sister were outside as this happened, and the crash occurred so close to them that my professor actually had to be treated for minor burns and lacerations from the crashed plane. He grew up, and loves flying in planes, and has never been particularly bothered by flying, even after having actually been in a plane later that had a minor crash on top of that. Meanwhile his sister suffered some significant emotional trauma from the event, and suffered from a severe phobia of planes and flying, and PTSD. She had to undergo CBT for months as an adult just to get to the point her therapist could take her to the airport and have her not lose her shit at the site of the planes outside on the runways.

Perceptions are reality - Everyone's perceptions are different, therefore everyone's reality is different. Depression is maladaptive behavior, but it is not IRRATIONAL behavior. Irrational or illogical are things like phobias, where you logically know that you are not in danger from something, yet you have an utterly overwhelming sense of fear of it anyway. Part of what makes depression very difficult is exactly how logical it is.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, one of the things that you need to understand there is hope versus hopelessness. Generally speaking, hopelessness is a primary defining characteristic of depression, as opposed to, say, sadness. This is the issue with where you're going with your series of premises - you have the unstated premise of hope. To think the way you're thinking and typing, they have to believe things can get better, that there is hope. When you're deep in a depressive cycle, you've lost that. Without hope, there can be no expectation of improvement, of things getting "better" and thus the rest of that line of reasoning doesn't exist.

eg: "Things have always been this way, therefore they will always be this way."

Also, most people in serious depression have little to no sense of self worth. And that's another unstated premise in your line of reasoning: That they deserve help. Many don't believe they do, and so they don't seek help. They believe their issue is their fault, which is reinforced heavily by the way any mental illnesses are treated in society, and this further reinforces the loss of self worth. Because they don't value themselves, don't think they deserve the help, don't believe they can be helped or that anything will ever get better, it is assumed that it can only A) Stay as miserable as it already is, where they want to stop the pain even if it means dying, or B) Get even worse than it already is, when they are already so miserable.

It's a deep and nuanced issue, but perhaps another example disorder can help a bit with that too. There are a small handful of mental disorders that are generally assumed to be effectively untreatable. Anorexia Nervosa is on the fringe of them, because it's so heavily supported by media and society that being thin is equal to being better, healthier, etc, so it can be exceedingly difficult to treat. Two that are far higher in the scale though are personality disorders, one being Borderline Personality Disorder, and the other being Narcissistic Personality disorder. I'll briefly get in to Borderline here, because it can help shed some light on this issue of perception of reality and logic...

Borderline Personality Disorder is, to explain it about as simply as I can, a disorder in which a person effectively cannot maintain a normal and lasting interpersonal relationship. They are prone to self-sabotage of relationships, whether it be friends, family, or significant others and children. Usually it is born out of some reoccurring trauma through childhood and adolescence, and the general concept kinda breaks down to this line of reasoning (which is how it ties to Depression for this discussion - assumption of continuity based on past experience and/or lack of hope):

People have repeatedly betrayed and traumatized me, especially the people least expected to do so. Therefore, everyone will eventually betray and traumatize me. I do not want to be betrayed and traumatized, so I will betray them before they get too close and hurt me. It's better for me if I hurt them so they do not hurt me.

There is that same assumption that what has happened repeatedly in the past is doomed to be repeated in the future, a lack of hopeful assumptions or considerations that the future could be better. And so with Borderline, it's virtually impossible to treat them because acting as a counselor for a person requires trust. The Borderline person refuses to trust anyone, will never be open with other people because that makes them vulnerable. Furthermore they are utterly convinced that their actions are the only correct actions to take to save themselves, so simply countering that is, to their perception of reality, you trying to hurt them. So by simple fact that you're even trying to treat them, that means you're trying to hurt them, which means you clearly cannot be trusted, which then means that it's impossible to treat them.

Again, it's an oversimplified adaptation of a deeply nuanced and complicated continuum of issues, but I hope that the explanations and examples are helping you to gain a bit better understanding of them. :)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not a problem. I generally do the same thing.

As to that question, there really isn't an answer. Or rather the answer is some combination of "we don't know" and "all of the above." One thing to note about a lot of the mental health stuff is that psychology is a "young" science, and worse still is one of the things that gets the term "soft" science which means it is somewhat lacking in respect professionally, though that has been changing over time. Most of psychology as we know it didn't start until the mid to late 19th Century. Most of what came from the origins of modern psychology has been thoroughly disproven over time, yet still gets talked about a lot as if it's still valid (eg: Freud - most everything he ever did has been disproven or shown to be a misguided and rudimentary idea of the truth, but he is talked about constantly as if his work is of modern relevance which mostly is not the case).

When it comes to any science, one must always remember that correlation does not imply causation. And that's of particular significance with Psychology. Most of Psych is dealing with correlations, because we cannot yet get at the mechanisms of causation. Cognitive Psychology is possibly the most "hard" scientific field in Psych, and basically came into being in the 1950's, depending on exactly where one separates things. We are just now beginning to have technologies that allow us to get a look at the brain as it functions, and start to get a better understanding of how it works mechanically, but there's a long way to go. The whole "Nature vs Nurture" debate is no longer a debate, and generally the answer to that part of it (the "something you are born with, or something that develops through life) is more or less set as: Both. You are born with a certain genetic code, but environmental factors can change and mutate that. How you are raised, where you are raised, what you learn, who you interact with, etc all change the formation of the brain, the neural pathways, systems of belief, and so on.

Exactly where depression comes from in all of this simply isn't well understood yet, especially because, as I mentioned earlier, no two people have quite the same depression. For some it can seem more physiological, others more chemical, others more bioelectric, and mostly a weird combination of all of the above. And then there are the vast differences in severity, what other issues it can cause, etc. For a lot of people, depression causes the brain to signal actual physical pain, even though there may be no physically present cause. One thing I can say though is that trauma definitely triggers it in most people, it is not a requirement. It's more along the lines that people can fall into a depression for no readily apparent reason, but a readily apparent reason is highly likely to trigger a depressive cycle. There is also the note that for some you have temporary issues, while others have chronic issues, and both can still fall under the guidlines for Major Depressive Disorder.

Now, to touch on your question about Borderline... The answer is no, but to varying degrees, much like everything else. Normal is a bit of a loaded word... But if a person is genuinely suffering from Borderline, they are highly unlikely to be able to lead a normal life. Much like you said, they will sabotage most anything, including work relationships and such. I know a person who suffers from Borderline, and as long as I've known her she's been a patholigical liar, has never been able to hold down a job for longer than about 6-9 months, bounces between friends and often spends time without any before trying to repair relationships, only to turn around and betray and hurt everyone all over again, including her own mother. That also leads to another note regarding Borderline - for some reason it's vastly more prevalent in women than men (something like 80% of diagnosed cases are women if I'm remembering correctly). It's somewhat counterpoint being Narcissistic Personality Disorder, which is more prevalent in men, but not by as large a margin.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I thoroughly enjoyed reading all of your posts, and if there is one thing I learned from all of that, it is that I really like Khale.

View attached image.
8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Also, an additional note I momentarily forgot about because I'd begun explaining about Borderline - Where you asked about the ability to realize that maybe people not helping weren't professionals: That's part of the problem. For a lot of us, they WERE professionals. Or at least they were people we believed were professionals, or were told were, etc. Things like Social Workers, School guidance counselors, or even psychologists and psychiatrists.

The professionals are still human. They make mistakes. Also, with mental health issues, trust and fit are big components, and there are a myriad of different counselling techniques. So a person may have sought help from the first, second, third, or more actual qualified professional, but it continued to fail for any number of reasons, so they now believe it will always fail.

To illustrate how different some techniques can be: I already covered CBT a bit. To offer a hugely different counterpoint there's also what's called "Existential Therapy" which effectively comes down to a therapy based on the idea that all the issues stem from conflict with their assumptions...
One therapy practice for Existential that I found particularly offputting to have observed learning about the different styles, effectively had a Therapist confronting, or even yelling at their patient. You can think of it like a Drill Instructor in the military. Telling them they are wrong, demanding they change the thought pattern, etc, can be effective for the right person... For the wrong person, it can be just downright traumatic. Which could lead to them fearing further "help" from actual professionals as well.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you are really good at explaining mental illness; I think i need a few classes from you.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just wanted to thank you, as I learned some pretty useful knowledge, that perhaps can save somebody's life at some point.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Forgive me for tagging onto your essay 8 month late; nevertheless, you seem to be one educated in the field, without serious flaws of your own perceptions. I have found that (pick a number) many in the profession are drawn to the field in an effort to heal themselves--and thus, coming from a "maladaptive" process of thinking, make for terrible psychologists. I applaud you for your lucidity though you admit to suffering depression yourself.

I am glad that you focused on the point that sufferers can be highly LOGICAL, not illogical, yet mal-adapted to the condition. Khale: "It's more along the lines that people can fall into a depression for no readily apparent reason, but a readily apparent reason is highly likely to trigger a depressive cycle."

It pisses me off so much to hear so much focus on chemical, electrical, physiological imbalances that are causing a condition. No one wants to properly acknowledge the ISSUE, chronic or temporary. If someone wakes up one day inexplicably depressed, by all means, skip a trusted friend, seek a professional plus medication to guide the brain back into balance. Nevertheless, so often, the trigger event is VITAL.

We lump a traumatic event into a simplified box. Rape from a stranger is NOT the same as coerced sex from a close, trusted relative. The abandonment of death is NOT similar to the abandonment of divorce. Orphaned by the death of parents is NOT similar to a parent adopting (giving up/abandoning) a child out. The death of a sister from an accident is NOT similar to the same death cause by MY accident.

You may know of a brilliant piece from The New Yorker, "Head Case: Can Psychiatry be a Science?," March 2010. "...14 million Americans suffer major depression each year...and 3 million suffer minor depression. GB thinks numbers like these are ridiculous--not because people aren't depressed but because, in most cases, their depression is NOT A MENTAL ILLNESS. IT'S A SANE RESPONSE TO A CRAZY WORLD."

I also see blithe recommendations to "seek professional help that is readily available." Therapy is not cheap--approximately $100 per hour. It is not like a dentist visit wherein one pays the fee and gets it done. No--therapy assumes repetitive weekly charges that many people cannot begin to seek as a viable option. Then, there is the advice: if the first 2 or 3 psychologists or therapies or medications do not work well, seek another one--thank you for highlighting that this is an extremely SOFT science when approaching the vast complexity of the brain. Nevertheless, many do not have the resources to shop around for a "good fit"--it is too expensive.

I have had the fortune of a extra time on my hand. I am no trained psychologist, but I have read enough and meditated enough on my religious life to muster compassion for those who are going through a hardship. Do you know what a visit to the psychologist feels like to me? Like a prostituted friendship. Someone cannot find a good friend to lend them an empathetic ear; so, they must pay someone to fill that roll on an hourly basis. Yes, Prostitution. One pays for a haircut, but must one really pay money for a kind ear?!

You want to talk for over an hour to me? Oh, ok, go--I have extra time today. The compassion of a friend can go a long way if there is an identified issue that one wants to mull over. I can be your sounding board to help you process and vent. Putting up a net on the Golden Gate Bridge is not really helpful.

Whether on this site or the myriad of other portals on the internet, your own behavior DOES have an effect upon others. You CAN decide to be the guy who helps rather than hurts.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nothing whatsoever to forgive. I can't speak for anyone else, but I have no problems at all with a bit of a thread necro because you found my post and wanted to reply to me. I'll do my best to touch on all your points here. And I thank you for the compliments there. I tend to be a very rational and logical person - even when I am going through clearly irrational and illogical emotional issues. It is a goal of mine to be as lucid as I can be, and as self aware, because those things are the building blocks I use to correct my own maladaptive thinking, as well as guide my friends and family through their own.

So, to start with here: It's very true that a lot of people I knew studying psychology were doing it for reasons similar to your description, and I tend to agree with you that it leads to poor caregivers. I went into Psychology classes out of, more or less, idle curiosity. I was intending to finally get my degree in Computer Science only to find out that my campus didn't offer all the courses needed. I decided to get a basic AA and transfer to Uni instead. In filling out core requirements I decided to take Psych classes since I'd always had some interest - discovered that I really enjoyed it, and wasn't half bad at it. I never intended to be a counseling psychologist however.

If I were ultimately to stay directly in the field of psychology in the future, I would do research. I am self aware enough to know that I would not necessarily be a good fit as a counselor, but more over that I could not handle the feelings associated with any serious failures. I care way too much, and if I failed and had a client get hurt, or commit suicide, etc, the amount of depression and self doubt that would cause would be way too detrimental to my own mental health, which would then lead to a vicious cycle of more failures, both real and perceived. Knowing this about myself, I would never inflict it upon either myself or those that would be expected to trust me as a counselor. I'll counsel and give advice to close friends, because they come to me anyway - the fact that I've studied is irrelevant, or at most tangential. They came to me for help before I ever studied, and they would still come to me even if I hadn't.

You're very right that "traumatic event" is lumped together far too much. More over, people focus on the event, and not the response to it. We have a very real penchant to judge everything based on our own perceptions of reality, and our own perceptions of the idea of normalcy. As you say, those different traumas are all very different from each other. But, perhaps even more importantly, individuals reactions to the same event can be drastically different. What is, for one person, effectively not traumatic at all can be horribly traumatic for another in the same situation. It's been 8 months, so I could be wrong, but I think I went over that in my various posts above and used the anecdote from one of my Psych professors about himself and his sister both seeing a plane crash at a hospital and how he was largely unaffected by it, but his sister suffered for years from PTSD and a severe phobia of planes and flying.

Society does a fair share of victim blaming and shaming, which gets a fairly significant amount of coverage and noted as being wrong. I don't, however, see much of anything anywhere ever going into things like perceptions of loss and trauma. If you lose your job, the common person is expected to move along and try to find a new job, and it's generally not treated as though it is a trauma. For some people, that loss can be devastating with long lasting repercussions. In point of fact, some of the highest suicide rates (at least in the US here when I was studying) were among elderly men, and it was heavily correlated to retirement. The loss of the job they had defined themselves with created a loss in the sense of self, a loss of self worth. Coupled with other issues of advancing age, the traumas kinda all pile together and lead to a much higher than normal development of depression and related suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

Also, you are absolutely correct that seeking care is far more difficult than it should be. It is something that is, imo, abhorrent about the current health care system here in the US. Our health care system is a failure at pretty much every level when it comes to accessibility, but even most of the better options for those that can actually afford medical coverage and what not still have very limited, if any, mental health coverage. Couple the cost with the massive social stigma around mental health care, and it can be extremely difficult to attain. At least here in the US, there are actually some free resources available however, so it's not impossible. Those vary by location however, and in some more rural areas it could be far more difficult than in the more urban. The best bet is to contact a local health department and ask.

That said, our opinion of counseling is not terribly different. I don't voice my feelings on it because I would never want to dissuade people from seeking treatment. I have attempted to seek treatment a couple times in the past, but it has been... Unpleasant. I am, I think, just about the worst possible patient for a counselor as well. I have some trust and abandonment issues, so opening up to someone is not a simple thing for me, but I'm also very intelligent, well read, and fairly self aware. Much of my time in counseling sessions has ended up feeling to me like a waste of time, either because I am unable or unwilling to share enough to get something out of it, or because anything they have had to say was of no value to me as I'd already either realized it myself long before they said it, or realized it was wrong and discounted it.

I prefer to discuss things with my friends as well. For me, it's not only a cheaper, but honestly a better alternative. Sometimes all I need is to get some shit off my chest, have people remind me that they care, and give me the sounding board for me to figure out where my issues stem from. Then I can start to alter my own thought processes, and drag myself out of the cycle of maladaptive thinking. Not that that's easy, and not that that's something I'd encourage anyone to do really - but it works for me. I have managed to avoid becoming an alcoholic or drug addict as a means of self medicating, which is something that happens to a lot of people that choose not to seek proper treatment. However one could argue that I, instead, use books, movies, TV shows, video games, etc as a means of self medicating to escape reality and I'd be hard pressed to say they are wrong. At best, I would argue those things give something positive as well, as I have topics to use to engage people socially, more knowledge to bring to bear on problems presented, and generally less detrimental health effects than drug and alcohol use entail.

And to address your last point there - You are absolutely correct. Everyone has an impact, no matter who they are. And a lot of people in the world are walking a razors edge of neutrality - It takes very little impact to push their daily life to either the positive or negative side of the spectrum. You can make someone's whole day brighter with just a little human decency - a smile or a kind word. Or you can ruin it with the opposite. Sometimes I can be a real asshole, and I know that. I think anyone can be. But I actively try to be a source of positivity, and not negativity. I am a cynic and realist most of the time, but I try to put out more optimism instead because I'd rather the ripples I make with my life help make the world a better place, even if I don't always believe it's a realistic goal. The more the world seems a cruel and dark place, the more reason there is to try to give some warmth and light I suppose. I may never be a roaring bonfire for the people around me... But I still try whenever I see the opportunity to at least strike a match.

And now that I have spent another very late night here making a massive wall of text regarding psychological issues, I bid you, and these forums, a very good night. :)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Heh...he was received with contempt
Someone even took the opportunity to leech. that was really the epitome of the thread.
someone actually wanted a dead mans account.
this is SG, the very nature of the site is bound to attract all kinds of people.
the site does not mature. ever since then, new members have joined the community.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

someone actually wanted a dead mans account.

Oh god...

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Finding that it appears to be real and he did apparently kill himself.
It's just really sad. Sad that he felt he had to do that. Sad he got a lot of negativity where he would've needed support.
Sad that there are so many fake emo's attentionwhoring online that people who are genuinely troubled are not believed.
And in this case it was apparently a really troubled person, not a fake emo.

Just sad

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It is very sad that we're expected to expect less humanity just because "this is the internet, and trolls are everywhere." Seeking help elsewhere is easier said than done for some. Not everyone has genuine friends in real life or have parents who understand. This was a 16-year-old boy. He did not know better than to turn to the internet. He even posted on a "Suicide Watch" board, yet people did not take him seriously. Suicide is never a laughing matter. The internet is such an unapologetic, apathetic, inhumane space. Rather than expecting others to have thick skin "because it's the internet", should we not expect more humanity?

lol. Who am I kidding?
This is the internet, after all.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 7 years ago by fubarnocaps.