Anti-fascism Train [short 0+ lvl ENDED]

How is the fake votes not an indicator for fascism? You barge in, yell random things and in the meanwhile don't know what fascism is. If my description isn't enough then read the damn definition before you start waving your arms around, crying foul.

the pot calling the kettle black. there have been cases of electoral fraud even here in italy. recent cases and related to this decade, not 70 years ago during the era of fascism. http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2012/11/22/catanzaro-brogli-elettorali-tar-manda-a-casa-sindaco-e-giunta-pdl/422960/, http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/politica/spettro-brogli-sulle-primarie-voto-sospeso-seggio-1391521.html

does it make modern days italy fascist? Does it make the political parties involved (including the democratic party) fascist? only this foolish and nonsensical assumption of yours speaks by itself. you are a poser.

Well, lovely to see that you know one side of the conflict. I trusted that you knew about the conflict, you don't. My bad. Shouldn't have trusted you. I mean, knowing 50% is better than my 0%, but knowing anything less than 90%, meaning that you know the full story with maybe a few minor blanks, means that maybe you should figure out more before doing more than presenting one side of the story.

the fallacy of your logic leaves me speechless. by grace, how do you know that this is half of the story considering that (by your own admission) you know nothing about it? and still based on that, why put "georgian aggression" in your personal list that makes russia fascist?

https://www.rferl.org/a/What_Could_Replace_Russian_Peacekeepers_In_Breakaway_Regions/1192520.html

"again, sources. " - What? You've got to be kidding me. You come claiming stuff with no proof and I'm the one that needs to present it? Practice what you preach...

-

You come claiming stuff with no proof

???

Putin's probably the best example currently. Runs the whole country himself, doesn't really have actual elections with realistic results.
He also supports one certain ideology, censors all of the others and he's also notoriously aggressive. Georgia, Middle East, Ukraine, all are good examples of unnecessary aggression from them.

dude.

They actually did lie. They said that they hadn't sent any forces at first. They even covered up license plates, claiming that literally all of those soldiers were rebels. That's why there was speculation between either military intervention or just funding from Russia.

wew now i can tell how much of this story you know. you are basically repeating like a parrot everything you have heard from cnn. the deployment of russian forces was approved by the russian parliament, the news was known ever since. as you are basically trying to find any possible excuse to bring water to your mill its better to be clear:

lying does not make you a fascist.

Single ruler, censorship, one accepted opinion.

if you ask an anti-communists with no clue about what communism actually is, they will tell you the same exact thing.

Pussy Riot

LOL. i'm even surprised that the myth of the poor and oppressed revolutionary russian woman who fight for muh democracy is even still up. the pussy riot are a bunch of degenerate exhibitionist feminist whores who claim to be politically persecuted and jailed for their political activity while yelling and braying with their boobs out in the streets, pissing in churces and covering with their shit and their period sacred and public effigy. they often are charged for acts of blasphemy, obscene act in public places, disturb of public peace and social disorder. but nevermind this stuff, keep on watching cnn.

Give me reasons why they're not fascist.

russia is not fascist. the reason for it lies in the ideology itself. fascism is, first of all, a socio-economic political doctrine centered fascist corporatism, thus a society based on social groups aiming to make the concept of class struggle outmoded (communists often are critics towards this point, still, that's what it claims to do) by having workers and employers actively participating in the economy of a country and in every sector that compels it, with one social group for everyone of it. the state has the role of supreme guarantor (qt. from mussolini - everything for the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state), and in union with all social groups, the economy and production are structured according to the needs of the community. to keep in mind that corporativism does not come from the word corporation but from CORPUS, meaning body in latin. needless to say fascism is not libertarianist as it is not socialist, it stands in the middle. hence why is often called "the third way". authoritarian centrism to the core.

this is fascism. hoping to having expressed to concept well enough for you to be now acknowledged, is russia fascist?

Oh, terms don't evolve with the time. Okay. My bad. I thought that language evolved, accommodating to the changes in history. A vehicle didn't use to account for motor vehicles, yet now it does. I guess that's just a fluke though.
Let's just make up a new term then. It'll mean the same, it'll include all of the same people/nations, but for some reason that's so important to you.

of course leanguage evolves, ideologies on the other hand does not. if anything they can develop into alternative doctrines if they start from a pre existing ideology. the way i see it, for russia it is legit to talk about authoritarianism only, with a tiny spike of nationalism.

But then... I understood. I'm not talking to a person here. I'm either talking to someone argumentative, meaning that you don't have to believe in what you write, instead you thrive on confict. In that case, it's fine. People are different.
Or... instead I'm talking to an ideology here. In which case... why even bother. You give statements that the leaders of your ideology have given and you defend those people yourself, not always using logic, but instead falling into semantics. In that case, I'm sorry. I've been in that situation. Staying rigid with your convictions is fine, but taking someone else's beliefs with only giving it a slip of a thought is... well, sad. Propagating someone else's ideal

the hell is the point of all this ridiculous mental gymnastic? looks like a bunch of nonsensical pretestuous assumption in a (vain) attempt to look edgy. get real ffs.

This won't lead anywhere.

my feeling too tbh, damn people talking about thing they don't know shit about. would really like to bid you farewell for good but that answer would be very appreciated.