Should we have a ranking for all the SteamGifts groups to see how many giveaways they've created?
Example:

Rank Gifts Sent Group
1 37.576 Example Group
2 29.982 Another Example Group
3 12.012 N Group
8 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Should have a rank of related groups the amount of sweepstakes?

View Results
Yes
No

I think there should be a rank groups.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I am also curious who has made the most ga??? Person not group

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

So why not a rank groups and users?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

yeah that is what i meant

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

View attached image.
8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If that would be public, that person would have so many beg requests…

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yep this method will be awesome!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The giveaways statement, could be by value and quantity.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Must be just to see the biggest SteamGifts related groups, see the biggest groups on the site, make a classification, it also should help with the recruiting, people will get interested I think.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Would also help leechers know which public groups to join. :p

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, you're right. But we can blacklist these leechers.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Could actually help with recruitment as mentioned below. Now you can only link group page, but getting actual data from it is not that easy, especially with old groups with multiple pages of GAs. It would help to promote group by for example being able to prove what you are saying that "we are one of the biggest most active groups on SG", or "we are the oldest active SG-related group" etc.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Rank groups by number of giveaways

it's another stat, maybe it would help someone.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What is N?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

N = random number of groups forming part of the rank

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Like n we use in mathematics?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes, is it :]

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

N means any random name that doesn't matter

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I support because I think an incentive for groups to do more sweepstakes, so bringing us more gifts

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Wow Dude, great idea ... Lets Go ( I voted Yes )

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why not? Come on! It's very interesting, at least, to kill our curiosity. =D

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Awesome idea. I voted yed :D thanks!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I see that many would like. :)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Fantastic. Loved!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Bump

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

YES!!!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

\o/

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This is a good method to explore more the group option :).

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Tssssssssssssssss

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Bump

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If they create stats like this, this will boost up giving away because there would be a challenge between top groups.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Good idea!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Bump.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nope, dont think so, not at all, bad idea. Heres why, people are competitive, as soon as we have a top giveaway 'group' or 'user' people will want to hold that position. Sounds harmless, but it always gets salty. Using scrap.tf as an example, over the course of 6 months, I saw several top rafflers quit, or get banned, because of infighting over who was better than who. At one point, a very prominent raffler got banned and the site divided overnight, I'd hate to see that happen here.

This site already has started to segregate itself from public to private, and now with any restriction you can think of. Dont have a ratio of 3:1, I think youre a leech and you cant enter my giveaway. BUUUUUT it still counts towards total giveaways so I'm the best gibber ever. Then you have people who makes their gibs for everyone salty over the other person having all the recognition, but only giving away to his little uber ratio click, while they give all away in public giveaways, which honestly drives the site more in terms of new users.

Just my opinion though.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Bump.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Good, i like the idea.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thats a wonderful idea!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.