Am I the only one who finds a lack of titles they can bid on? Even as a beginning contributor are you still left out of the good stuff?

Anyone else think there should be some sort of limit to the limits? Nothing currently prevents every giveaway from being contributor only. Any idea's of a good limit system?

11 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

It is up to the creator of giveaways to decide how they want to handle out their gifts. Using force on this matter is bound to end up badly. Also, maximum contribution requirement is limited at the moment to 5000 dollars (which requires that creator has given 2500 dollars worth of gifts).

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I wanted to say this. It's up to each one to decide how they want to give.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

seriously, its a way to thank contributors, creator should be able to choose who he wants to thank to.

BUT, as a contributor of 30$ i really think people should stop putting minimum 30.01$ on their giveaways!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's the point to not let bundlers get into your giveaway...
Before bundle games were allowed, people used to set 0,01$ of contribution.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's my favorite limit to set TBH. .

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Then contribute more then just bundle games. Go contribute Zeno Clash or something.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's a bundle game....

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Burn!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Haha $30.01 is hilarious! Just buy 1 actual game rather than give away bundle games and you'll be over the $30 barrier.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

nope

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

People decide how they want to gift, it's their game, and their good will. If you want to join those giveaways, contribute!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There already is, you can't put the contribution requirement higher than twice your own.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This, also, you can't set the limit to higher than $5000, or so I've heard.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yet another one of these, huh?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Guys, I don't think I'm getting enough free stuff, and that's because it's all going to people who have contributed to the community. Let's take action!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

ain't that the shits

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I turned off my filter to see all giveaways, and at least 50% of them have no contributor limit at all.

If you really want to be able to enter more then that, you'll just need to contribute more. Keep in mind it's not the site that sets these limits, it's the user's choice when they create their giveaways.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

lol... i think there should be more +350$ contributor only giveaways.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

actually something does prevents all giveaways from being contributor only and that is people creating their first giveaway

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think people who create giveaways should be allowed to set their own limits with as little interference from "the powers that be" as possible

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

People who create giveaways can set the limit for contribution as double their own contribution. So I could make a giveaway for $119.90 if I so wanted.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think there should be peace in the world, still do I get my wish?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I would be way more impressed if this came from a 2k+ contributor and not someone as selfish.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

maybe if you, instead of having a points cap change etc yadda yadda, instead of that you had an ENTRY limit, based on contribution level. so say you could enter 10 in 24 hours with 0 level, and that went up by say 5 for every £25 your contributor level went up.

no need for a maximum really, as you'd run out of points

this would sort of stop the spamming of games they would never play (yes I have quite a few ive not gotten around to yet lol)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's more of a pay-to-win system, which isn't what this site is about.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

free to play i think. you still get entries, you just get more entries of you contribute. its just an incentive.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Current system, while having some faults, is nice as it basically gives everyone their fair chance and is same for everyone. Limits set by the creator of the giveaway are merely supported by the system, not enforced by it. No one forces member to set any contribution requirement. It is set because creator wanted to place it.

What I consider curious is that when people wish for removal of every barrier (no private, group or contribution giveaways), they somehow usually think that those giveaways would still be magically created. Most likely they were created for friends and such in the first place, not for public. Removing barriers would probably result that such giveaways would not be created.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No. Contribute more instead QQ about how unfair it is.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Stop crying! The best giveaways are made in groups anyway.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah I think you're doing this wrong

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's fair OP

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 11 years ago by Gengi.