Do you disable ads on sites you like (in general) in order to support them?
I always disable it on Steamgifts. Heck, after all, cg only implemented ads on Steamgifts due to the community pressuring him into doing so.
Comment has been collapsed.
Honestly, I can't be convinced to disable ad blocks after I've gotten viruses in an advert on a trusted site.
Comment has been collapsed.
Right, because I should just dump the compatibly it offers to get something which can still get viruses itself. If you can browse the internet with it, there is bound to be a virus that can target it. Nothing is free of them. So I'll just block the stuff that would get the viruses.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't use adblock anymore, and I tend to keep away from sites with intrusive/annoying ads.
Comment has been collapsed.
This is the only time I'm happy to be living in a 3rd world country. Just like everything else, annoying sites with intrusive ads haven't fully developed yet.
Comment has been collapsed.
Maybe I should get you HuniePop to scratch that itch ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
I used to never use adblock on youtube to support youtubers i enjoy, but as youtube grew it lets them put multiple adds in the same video ... i watch a 20 min video with 6 adds so i had enough and now i use adblock only on youtube if they change heir ways and they let only one skipable advertisement at the start of the video i will disable it but since they are greedy i doupt it
Comment has been collapsed.
If CG only added them after being pressured by the community to do so, then he obviously doesn't need or really want the ad revenue ... so I'll keep using adblock.
If he wants to add a donate button, that's a different story. I'd much rather donate directly.
Comment has been collapsed.
If ads were actually worth unblocking I might be more willing to put up with them. There are better ways to fund community-focused websites like this.
The Guardian is the only site I give a pass atm and as soon as I can afford to pay their membership thing that'll fuck off too. Ads are godawful and pay a pittance to site owners, the death of them will be a magical thing.
Comment has been collapsed.
Hm, I definitely would like to support sites I like, but I'd like to understand the reasoning.
As far as I know, no ads pay the site owners per view (since that could be easily exploited), so most ads pay per click, some even per certain actions past the ad (e.g. an actual purchase). So just enabling ads is not helping anyone, right? Or did cg manage to find an ad network that pays per view?…
Comment has been collapsed.
No thanks, ads are bad no matter what site they are on. If website owners need cash that badly, then they should just charge for use, even if it's just to keep the site up.
Comment has been collapsed.
if cg could eliminate dubious ads such as the g2a ones and alikes, I will do so by all means.
Comment has been collapsed.
Ads are based on a users search/browsing history so yo have yourself to blame for those even though cg could contact the ad provider to have certain ads removed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Are you being ironic? Ads often are exactly frigging pop ups blocking half of the screen, autoplaying video and audio.
Also, good job playing the entitlement special card.
Comment has been collapsed.
I am being serious and I am talking about Steamgifts where I never experienced any pop ups, not websites and ads in general. I am also blocking ads on webs where they are overly distruptive, but in the end, I tend not to frequent such websites.
Comment has been collapsed.
I got ads like that a while ago too, but in the last year I can't remember getting anything with music or any sound around here. Guess it depends on the region, browser, other sites visited and whatnot. I'd also guess that maybe companies have realized annoying ads like those are the reason adblock is used in most cases, so they are abandoning them? I hope.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'd honestly rather donate than let ads display. I don't believe in automatic data collection. I'd tell any living person anything that want to know about me (within reason), but I don't want my information stored on a server that's publicly accessible, whether it's used to serve me content or not. Proudly using uBlock Origin + NoScript everywhere.
Comment has been collapsed.
17 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by ONZRAL
38 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by hbarkas
20 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by QuartzPort
1,063 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Mayanaise
12 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Formidolosus
331 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by Daud
22 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by FEGuy
95 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by PunishedStig
11 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by MarvashMagalli
17,179 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by adam1224
2,770 Comments - Last post 33 minutes ago by Mayanaise
27 Comments - Last post 37 minutes ago by moonlightdriver
3,556 Comments - Last post 53 minutes ago by NekroNoob
118 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by faelynaris
I've been worrying about the state of internet advertising. Adblock is killing the already-inefficient industry of banner ads, the longtime staple of internet advertising. And the industry is adapting in ugly ways. Ads are gone from our webpages, but then YouTube gets 30-second unskippable ads. An Adblock comes out for that, now they're on YouTube Mobile. The end result of this trend is paywalls, Adblock-blockers, "complete a survey to read this article", and all of the other corporate crap that we now have to wade through on so many sites now.
So now, I unblock websites I enjoy, especially ones not owned by billion-dollar corporation, to prevent them having to go that route just to survive.
Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of sites I can't stand the ads on. Pre-Adblock, I had to make sure Grandma wasn't around before browsing a site like Pirate Bay.
But in my short time here, I've come to love this site, and I want to support it however I can.
Comment has been collapsed.