Expansions which are almost whole new games are fine, DLC -s like cosmetic shit and whatnot are horrible.
DA:Origins is great, dont remember the DLC-s adding anything extremely awesome, and I usually try to refrain from special armors/weapons cause they are usually imbalanced.
ME2 is awesome but again I forgot exactly what goes into the DLC-s. That thief girl is a DLC char I think...
Borderlands 2 DLC-s, the non cosmetics one are great, some more some less.
Comment has been collapsed.
Tiny Tina's Assault on Dragon Keep - best DLC ever, imho (though damn, Tales of the Sword Coast is right up there).
Honestly, if a DLC adds something I want to a game - whatever that might be - a cool outfit, an additional adventure and more hours of fun, or (omg!) the soundtrack, or hell, even if I just want to support the devs a little more - I typically don't have a problem purchasing it. It comes down to personal value per dollar. If you're cool with the base games, power to you. If the next guy wants that little extra, power to him, too.
TLDR: I just feel that we're lucky to have so many options - something for everyone.
Comment has been collapsed.
Agreed. I did exaggerate a bit in my rant above... But the main point still stands -- there is so much DLC out there that actually screws up the balance of the original game, I am starting to be very wary of it.
Another "recent" example: Shadow of Mordor GOTY... Right from the start, my character receives some "Epic Runes" from absolutely nowhere, making my character a lot more powerful than it should be from the start... As soon as I figured I was not supposed to have those per the original game design, I decided not to use them. Problem solved...? Well, sort of -- the rune's presence took a small bite of the immersion the game was supposed to provide...
But I agree with you: (i) there are exceptions, like, DLC which really is fun or adds something good to the game, and (ii) to each his/her own, some people do want a power fantasy (we all do, to some extent) and might appreciate extra tools, XP, guns, etc. from the start. Fair enough. :D
Cheers!
P.S.: By the way, I always find funny that soundtracks are sold as DLC... I mean, I do not mind that they are sold... But why do I have to have the game to buy its soundtrack? Why can't I have the soundtrack by itself? :D
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeha, nice job SG.
My reply was not saved and page did not load ....
Edit: I'll try again.
After Mass Effect 1 & 2 and Borderlands 1 on the Xbox 360 where I paid for the DLCs/Season Pass I'll wait for GotY Editions now. ME 3 was a bit annoying because of important Story content locked behind a paywall.
Or I won't buy if the DLCs are egregious as hell like in Shadow Of Mordor.
Anyway, was your OP really 2 years old before anyone answered?
Comment has been collapsed.
31 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by slurredprey
54 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by sensualshakti
450 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by klingki
7 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by xXSAFOXx
16,297 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by SebastianCrenshaw
206 Comments - Last post 14 hours ago by Joey2741
31 Comments - Last post 15 hours ago by Pika8
44 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by Tucs
690 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by Fitz10024
171 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by Fitz10024
128 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by Swordoffury
50 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by Addriano13
138 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by grez1
51 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by raydotn
The Early Days
Since always, I made sure I only played my games in their most complete versions, with all Expansion packs. If a collection was available, I would try to get it all at once. So:
The expansions were rarely as good as the original game, but they did add to the story of the universe I was playing in, and did not detract from the main experience.
So you understand why I almost never entered giveaways just for base games -- I wanted it all, the FULL experience, not half of it.
The Age of DLC
But then, around 2005 or so... "Expansion Packs" started to become "DLC"...
Fair enough, most of these are RPGs, which already have padding in form of sidequests that added little to the story... but the DLC just aggravated the problem. I am sure you folks can think of non-RPG games with similar problems, where that extra gun or equipment you get from the DLC totally alters the balance and makes the game worse as a whole.
A Turning Point
So a while ago I bought Mass Effect 2 "Digital Deluxe Edition" from Steam, only realizing later that it did not include all the DLC, and that I could not get it from Steam at all. I was disappointed, but decided to play it anyway this past April. And you know what -- what a great experience, very streamlined, very little grinding or busywork (shame about mining asteroids, but that's about it).
So I entered a giveaway for Dragon Age Origins, just the base game... I won it, and decided to play it this past month.... again, a great experience! It dragged a bit as it was, so I can only imagine that DLC would make the "dragging" effect even stronger.
So now I am a changed man! Base games, you are welcome! Tomb Raider, L.A. Noire, Max Payne 3, come to me, without DLC! I do not need an extra gun, nor an extra fetch quest, nor a companion pet for my first 20 levels! Give me shorter experiences, with no padding! With so many excellent games out there, do we really need an extra 10 hours of things which are lower quality than the main game, or even diminish it? Let me play the game the way the original designers planned it!
End of Long Winding Rant
So... If you actually read this whole wall... What do you think?
Comment has been collapsed.