Bump for a pretty awesome train.
And yeah, I'm totally fine with short adventure games - and even with relatively short RPGs (like The Banner Saga), just like with the long ones. It's a question of proper pacing of narrative, not of the sheer number of hours spent in a game.
Comment has been collapsed.
i like short games because i'm not good at making the kind of commitment longer games need.
Comment has been collapsed.
Ah, you rock Fredrik. I love long games to be honest, specially strategy/management ones so a game that has between 40 and 100 hours to complete the campaign/story is not something I find hard to swallow.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm totally with you. I care only about quality, not length. I hate games that pad our their length with boring repetition. Mafia 3 is a perfect example.
If a game ends and leaves me wanting more, that's good thing!
If I get bored before I reach the end, that's a problem. I should be enjoying playing your game, not wondering how much more I have to slog through before its over.
Comment has been collapsed.
Suxx that I'm stuck with backlog because of the stupid data cap that I can't download too much stuff
I don't actually know which one I prefer but I'll probably go with sidequests if they're in the game
Comment has been collapsed.
Shorter games > longer games because I tend to get distracted and start playing something else in the middle of longer games. Hello to the 200 or so games in the shame pile of unfinished games :(
Nothing that I can see myself having time or will to play in the next month, but have a bump for some great giveaways!
Comment has been collapsed.
stalks on BLAEO
Oh shit.... Thanks for making me feel better about myself and best of luck with that pile! :P :D
Comment has been collapsed.
it's better for a game to be as long as it needs to be, than pad out its length with filler content.
Agreed :) I actually prefer shorter, more linear games over the super-long ones with huge open worlds, because they often end up overstaying their welcome. Thanks for the train, entered a few giveaways (I'll be in quite a predicament if I happen to win one, with my procrastination and all, lol :D)
Comment has been collapsed.
Nice selection of GAs! I entered two. :)
Thanks, and a bump!
Comment has been collapsed.
As long as I enjoy playing it, I think a game is worth it whether it is long or short (or somewhere in between).:)
BUMP!
Comment has been collapsed.
193 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by reigifts
28 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by Foxyyy
319 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by BHTrellis188
31 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by EloyOn
366 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Aliaxi
26 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Chris76de
25 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by SupportForFun
554 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Prosac
4 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Asulf
61 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Phantomreader42
24 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by AceBerg42
133 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by reigifts
69 Comments - Last post 48 minutes ago by zevnda
1,078 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CakeGremlin
There are some people who like to measure the value of their games in how long they are compared to how much they spent. Personally I'm not a fan of this, I would much rather pay for a short game that's engaging all the way through, than a long game that's just engaging most of the time. Of course, everything has its limits, but I feel like it's better for a game to be as long as it needs to be, than pad out its length with filler content. Case in point, Mafia 3 would be a lot better if they had skipped the whole "take over the city" part, and just had the story missions. That's not to say that games should be short, imagine if Pillars of Eternity had been a 4h game, that would not have worked with that kind of story.
But here are some giveaways for some games that are not super short. Do note that I am asking something of you if you're winning one of these, so read the descriptions.
Reading is good
Comment has been collapsed.