Would it be useful to you?
I don't support the idea mostly for one reason: It would result in people wasting no effort or interest entering primarily giveaways for better games, increasing the chances that these games end up with winners who don't actually care about them. Or at least less than many others.
We already have some search parameters, we have the option to hide and to wishlist. It is absolutely possible to navigate SG without even more guidance.
Comment has been collapsed.
84 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by ChrisKutcher
16,299 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Carenard
56 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by Carenard
1,811 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by ngoclong19
72 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by Reidor
545 Comments - Last post 15 hours ago by UltraMaster
41 Comments - Last post 15 hours ago by ViToos
97 Comments - Last post 50 seconds ago by PonBaron
118 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by ginwarbear
184 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by kampeao
55 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by ChrisKutcher
32 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by marianoag
53 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by Tiajma
149 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Swordoffury
With the recent flood of bad games giveaways, asset flips, achievement spammers, etc. and the rare happening of decent bundles, I started to think how we could exclude those "games" from our daily SG browsing but yet be able to find those rare gems that even when they cost a few bucks can still provide a lot of fun. One Finger Death Punch is just one quick example.
Filtering through giveaway value or metascore can be quite unpractical, especially when browsing from different devices and mobile.
I realised that a new category that filters games based on number of Steam reviews and overall game rating, which threshold could be set by me, would quickly become my only browsed category after wishlisted.
See the images below to see how it could look like.
And have a giveaway.
Comment has been collapsed.