Crysis 3 Benchmarked : 38FPS Average for GTX680 2GB

A shame it's Origin only.

I expected it to be heavy. Very heavy. Phew.

so HD7970=GTX670

Overclocking the GPU means a lot more in benchmarking than the CPU.

Hey Look -5 FPS for me whoopie :D

generic watered down console fps, now with SUPER GRASS PHYSICS

using Origin for over a month now cant really complain am liking it so far

"Our game's AA is terribly optimised but we can just say graphics cards are behind our game."

I hv to buy new vga.. :S

its just an unoptimized console port .. EA and Origin SUX. they can keep the game. not even tempted to torrent it

boring game and bad porting

21fps for 7850 woohoo :) I never got to try out my new 7850 with the Crysis 3 beta.

At least it's easier to run than when crysis 1 first came out. Crysis 4 is most likely going to be released 1 year from now, probably going to need a GTX 780.

Nice

Bigger news is the 8 core AMD FX-8350 beats all the Intel Quad Cores including the Intel Core i7. I guess AMD is going to be better than Intel for console ports. Seems I got it right that AMD's 8 cores would be fully utilized but its sooner than 2020. I guess once developers learn how to make multi core games properly it can scale to multiple cores easily

Intel beats AMD at every price range except for AMD FX-4100 vs Intel Core i3-3220, AMD ties Intel; However the FX-4100 vs i3-3220 price range is irrelavent because its better to buy an Intel Pentium or Intel quad. Also Intel's Haswell processors are comming in Q2 2013 and are based on new architecture, not a die strink like ivy bridge was.

For AMD's FX 8 core cpu vs Intel's core i5 or core i7 4 core cpu, AMD's 8 core, high end FX processors are rubbish, the low end FX-4100 is okay for the price. First, most of the new games only fully utilize 3 cores, except GTA IV and Borderlands 2, to a lesser extent. Second, the FX processors are not energy efficient. Third, Intel's core i5 and core i7 are better in games, the FX bottlenecks in Metro 2033 and Skyrim.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8350-core-i7-3770k-gaming-bottleneck,3407-3.html

However in the future, about the year 2020, games will fully utilize 8 core and FX may be better. Also Playstation 4 and Xbox 720 are rumored to have 8 core AMD cpus so console port games may become better optimized for AMD.

http://kotaku.com/5977849/the-playstation-4-has-a-new-controller-fancy-user-accounts-and-impressive-specs-so-far

For graphics AMD or Nvidia doesn't matter. However if you get an AMD cpu you should get an AMD gpu.

Okay. To be clear: no, Crysis 3 is not badly optimized. In fact, it is very well optimized. It has a lot of specific video settings, all cores are utilized equally and the performance of the game scales properly with overclocking. It's a heavy game because it's truly next generation.

I dont get people , this game is horrible . I played the closed beta and the open beta and the game is just BAD!
compared to the shooters out there today its really not that good.

I'd get 14,3FPS :D well, i don't play on these resolutions (1280x1024 max), so my real FPS should double :P

Graphics aren't what make a game good.

will this work on a gt610?