I hope support is checking those since we can hardly report them without at least an inkling of proof.
Comment has been collapsed.
No profile links because rules, but you can just search for the giveaways
https://www.steamgifts.com/giveaways/search?q=30+impossible+levels
Comment has been collapsed.
You can always just use the Archive button in the footer to look up past giveaways, deleted or not. In this case, here are the people who made a giveaway for this game, both legit and regifts: https://www.steamgifts.com/archive/search?q=30+impossible+levels
Comment has been collapsed.
Hmm...
What is considered a "free" game to the extent it would then be removed from the giveaway list?
That was a big discussion a few weeks ago, with users re-gifting games from the giveaways at orlygift. Orly implemented a system to block users entering new giveaways if they hadn't activated anything they won on their steam account. Its not impossible to create alts to farm, but they have much lower chances and you have to rinse and repeat several times over.
For something as huge as 50,000 copies - whether it be here, Gleam, Orlygift, or anywhere else for that matter, it would be counted among the "free" aspect, right? Would it somehow affect an existing giveaway if after the giveaway is setup and running, to then remove the ability to giveaway that game since it could have been considered "free"?
Technically, you would assume that you would only see one copy to one person here on SG, with fewer alts due to the $100 sign-up requirement, while for stuff like Gleam all you need is an email address, but there are still those who we see such as now who will giveaway what they won immediately.
Maybe its already been discussed before. But nevertheless, food for thought.
Though, I want real food. Time to go make dinner.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm almost tempted to go buy a copy of the game off the steam store and give it away as a joke, but I don't think it'd be worth all the blacklists I'd get added to.
Comment has been collapsed.
Just a thought: don't bother with blacklists, as the worst offenders would be perma-banned anyway.
If you want to keep them out of your giveaways, you could enforce a level restriction,or make an invite-only giveaway protected by spyware SGTools.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm a bit confused as to what can be enough proof for regifting. Most are obvious: win the game, game not activated on Steam, and made a giveaway for that game immediately.
But what about someone who won the game, has it activated in his/her Steam account, and made a new giveaway for it? Said person could have bought the game to give after winning it. I saw one like this who just got permanently banned, and I'm not sure what could be the proof that he didn't buy another copy but is regifting?
And those people who are gifting 30 impossible levels without entering the massive giveaway beforehand. Is there any way to prove they are regifting?
Comment has been collapsed.
Unless you can see that the person won the game, doesn't have it in their library and is gifting it, you can hardly prove anything.
Btw, you can search here with the person's name and they will show up (as anonymous) even if they didn't mark as received.
There's a big chance that someone who's giving the game today has gotten it from an alternate account, but unless you can't prove it, don't bother reporting it. Support must be swamped in reports already.
Comment has been collapsed.
Is there any way to prove they are regifting?
Ve haff our vays....
Comment has been collapsed.
Big question is why they are able to make a ga for it in the first place. It should be removed as though it were a free game. Some games removed for being free were given away in lesser quantities.
Comment has been collapsed.
At least GameMiner and SteamCompanion are preventing people from giving it away, so we have two less places where we need to hunt down the offenders.
Comment has been collapsed.
I thought the reason that games were removed when free was to stop people levelling without spending anything and/or to stop the site being flooded with free games to save on server load.
As the game was given away on the site itself, and the rules of the site say that you must activate wins the things mentioned above shouldn't happen unless someone is breaking the rules.
Comment has been collapsed.
Tecnically it wasnt given away for free it was a very large giveaway
Comment has been collapsed.
1/20 done.. no suspension. (The guy deleted his giveaway and activated the game)
Edit: Actually, looking through the open reports, many of them has been suspended already and their giveaway deleted by support. I should probably close them since they're pretty much useless now. I also closed 2 alredy because the users deleted teir giveaways AND activated the game on their account.
Comment has been collapsed.
Perhaps should be part of the logic in creating a new GA.
Check if the game for new GA has previously won by the user.
(If it has been previously won) If it doesn't yet exist on their account - then it is being regifted & display a message explaining the rules on regifting.
Refuse to create the GA until the game exists on their account (suggest doing a sync just in case).
Comment has been collapsed.
What if i regift only 15 impossible levels? Less ban time? hahaha
Comment has been collapsed.
I think it would be a good idea to lower a user's CV for wins that are not activated on their steam account. Maybe instead of using the games value, use a system that exponentially increases the CV removed for every additional infraction. Something like -$5 for first, then -25, -100, -500, -1000, -5000. This will basically make it impossible for people who do not activate their wins to get above level 0. They can correct the mistakes and activate the games on their account and it then will remove the penalty when they sync their account.
Maybe have the server automatically report users that have a certain number of infractions and have not resolved them after a certain period of time. Then support can deal with suspending or banning them.
Comment has been collapsed.
294 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by OwieczkaDollyv21
189 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by BlazeHaze
375 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by AnonymousBroccoli
47,195 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by Mhol1071
49 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by OneManArmyStar
19 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by FranEldense
49 Comments - Last post 15 hours ago by RileyHisbert
164 Comments - Last post 24 seconds ago by gus09
113 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by drbeckett
45 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by 0ldNick
37 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by ChaosCVZ
55 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by PanTsour
17,018 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by Riszu
42 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Rinocap
DON'T. It's against the rules.
14 people currently regifting, some even with an attitude and history. -_-
Comment has been collapsed.