Well apparently one of the people working in Obsidian is part of the advisory board for Fig, so makes sense they went with that.
Edit: In the about page of fig one of the CEO of Obsidian is in the board.
Comment has been collapsed.
tbh I'd personally have doubts fu nding something on platform belonging to company doing crowdfunding. I get that crowdfunding is always a risk, but crowdfunding project on platform belonging to developer of said project is double risk. If you crowdfund on outside platform, first thing your project must fit criteria of said platform, it must be in some way secutre etc, on your own platform there would be no such o0bligation. If project turns out to be a scam you get refund, on such platfor you would not. Etc. I'm not sayig it's the case here, I don't think Obsidian guys to be scammers or anything, just saying it's kinda morally wrong in general to do things this way, no matter of it's done by studio I trust or not.
Comment has been collapsed.
As far as I'm aware, it's a 'by game developers, for game developers' platform, so an advisory board including invested game developers is necessary to the site's functioning. Being on an advisory board- that is, in a role to advise- doesn't necessarily mean influence over the direct control of the company.
Rather, it'd likely make the platform seem more legitimate, to other developers interested in using it.
Given the reputation of those currently involved in the company, it's similarly more trustworthy in reliability of releasing games than Kickstarters usually are. As such, so far there's really not any reason for backers to be concerned over the site, either.
Comment has been collapsed.
Fig is not name anyone know,
I know it. :P
From a SG user perspective, I actually think it's more surprising that you don't, given what it's already been used for; Consortium: The Tower, Wasteland 3, and Psychonauts 2 all got good exposure on SG when they hit Fig, as I recall. Consortium certainly did, given the free copies of Consortium that were being given away as part of that promotion.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's Obsidian. :P
Obsidian (AKA Black Isle/Troika) has such a long history of making exceptional albeit also exceptionally buggy :P games that they could stand on a street corner, and so long as they publicized it, people'd travel over to give them money. :P
There's a lot of costs related to gathering funds, and a streamlined site designed to manage such details cuts a lot of those costs down. Given the good reputation Fig has so far (while KS's has always been a bit sketchy), and the likelihood that Fig takes only a very small cut, it's no doubt a very good option for them.
Comment has been collapsed.
quite a jump there from 5 to 35 bucks you dont even get the first game xd, oh well, glad they did it, im still to play the first one.
Comment has been collapsed.
8,608 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Dayannah
172 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Tcharr
88 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Deleted2137
241 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by RCSWE
823 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by MagicDN
24 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by steveywonder75
443 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by crocospect
96 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Devirk
140 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by damianea103
3,485 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by yugimax
8 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by lext
1 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by AllTracTurbo
28 Comments - Last post 37 minutes ago by aquatorrent
260 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by wigglenose
https://www.fig.co/campaigns/deadfire
Kinda strange they put it on some niche crowdfunding platform, but maybe the case they take less % than KS and Pillars gonna get funded anyway wherever they put it after success of first installment.
Comment has been collapsed.