CoD MW3 giveaway.. only if you own no CoD game

You really have missed all the points I raised. 100%. slow clap

"Why do you even interfere in my affairs? No offense but nobody asked for your opinion and this just doesn't concern you." Why? Because you acted like a offended douche to someone merely trying to be nice and point you towards the site rules / FAQ, in a very polite way. Aside from that, people who don't have the decency to give a damn about site rules, thus don't bother reading them for a year+ irk me, on any site. As another member of the site, it absolutely concerns me, as I share this site with you, and I am entirely within my rights to voice my opinion; one which I'm sure many regular site goers / long-time members would agree on.

"I also don't know how indie developers publish their games on Steam because it's none of my business. Does that mean I have no clue how Steam works? Think about that."

That's an absolutely false and irrelevant analogy. Let's see if wording myself differently makes any difference as to your understanding of what I'm saying, as clearly my original message flew right over your head - evidenced by your stinted and irrelevant "counter-points".

We're talking about site rules, stuff you're expected to and should know after 1+ years on any site (unlike your pointless Steam analogy, where no one expects you to know how Steam works, nor is reading up on how it works any form of "decent thing to do"), especially if you're going to act offended when someone very politely points you to where you can read the site rules that you've neglected to read in all your time here. I wonder, by the way, if you've bothered reading them in the meantime.

As for "the OP didn't seem to have a moderator's permission at this point in time so technically I was right"? Oh really? Umm, firstly, reading all of OP's comments on here, he did ask for permission for his rules, albeit after he created the giveaway. If his requested rules aren't absolutely asinine, support most likely would forgive his mistake just this once, and approve the rules, asking him to modify his GA description to reflect such. And yes, he too made a mistake while being a member for a year+, but he's acting pro-active, polite, and admitting he screwed up when faced with it by others, unlike you. Second, your original statement was "it doesn't work that way. They won't re-roll the giveaway if somebody wins who doesn't meet your requirements because these are no official rules." You said this in ignorance of how the rules actually work (as evidenced by your own later comments), hence what that line meant in your head when you typed it was simple - "you're not allowed to have custom rules, only 'official' rules apply." That's not technically right;- it's not even a tiny bit right.

Why are you still trying to try and worm this argument in your favour with stinted analogies and arguments based on twisting context and fact? Can't you just say "yeah, I did act a little douche-y, my bad, and indeed, Khalaq was playing nice. And yeah, I should know the rules by now. Let me correct that and read them now." But no, you insist on trying to spin things in your favour and even try to cling on to "but I was technically right" (when - again - you weren't). Pretty lame and unappealing.