It is maps that cs:go is lacking the most ?

I think it's optimized enough.
I think it has plenty of maps.
I think it has plenty of weapons.
The problem I have, is it just doesn't feel like CS. It's lost it's arcadeish feeling for me.

most people nowdays buy laptops, they're good for work and you can carry them with you anywere you go, that's why valve need to think about this margin of gamers
people who can not buy expensive gaming laptops and can not buy a desktop because they need laptops for study or work but wish for a little CS fun

Thats called a casual; and doesnt deserves any alteration of a game meant for "true" gamers. Also, a gaming computer isnt something expensive if you build it yourself. I got mine two years ago for $1000 and still can run any game at max settings.

Anyway CS:GO sucks at all; but not because of bad graphic performances with.. bad bad regs.

it can run in my crappy laptop prefectly

When I played CS:GO during the free weekend, on my Intel HD Graphics (keep in mind, this is not the HD 3000 or HD 4000, but something like HD 2000/2500), it ran at around 30 FPS when I tweaked the graphics settings, and used 720p resolution. It did lag at times and if I'm not mistaking there are a few features which goggle up a lot of resources that can not be turned off at all. So yeah, it could probably use more work but then again they did create a new CS game for the graphics to be good, nothing else, so they made it thinking about what it will look like on the beasty computers of hardcore gamers, not laptops of the common man.

Well, i can run it on my 3 year old laptop with 256 vram memory and a intel core 2 duo so... I think Valve wants CS:GO to stay as the next 1.6, and they are really pushing a lot of updates and tweakings to please the hardcore fanbase. If they want the game to look good (to please the newcomers) and to stay around some time they can't make it so it works on the same computers that run 1.6. Vanilla CS is really really old. And almost anything you buy above 400$ nowadays can run CS:GO perfectly.

Oh, and i'm scepctic about Bioshock Infinite running on your laptop very well if it can't run CS:GO.

In my opinion, yes, because i love CS:GO, but i play the PS3 version.

It's impossible to play in Office or Italy on Classic Competitive because there are only two freakin' maps. And Arms Race feels repetitive and bland because there are only two maps.

I don't have a PC capable of running CS:GO :/

Well, new maps with custom gamemodes will surely not hurt the game. As someone who is not a cs fan at all this will probably make me at least check what people come up with.

No. CS:GO sucks because of the movement and the feel of the guns. They just had a recoil update in January. It's sad because a lot of people took the time to give good and detailed feedback during the beta. Most of it turned out being ignored. Instead they add stupid stuff like helicopters when you first spawn in on Aztec. Also that fog. GTFO.

Sure, CS:GO isn't for everyone, maybe not even the hardcore Source players out there. But I personally think it's one of the best multiplayer games I've ever played. The simplicity of it all is actually very appealing to me. Such a nice change from the hectic COD games. This is coming from a guy who didn't enjoy Source at all, despite the numerous similarities.

Before the workshop update was released, I definitely thought that the game needed more maps. Re-makes only last so long before they get ultra repetitive. Hopefully we can expect even more official maps (remakes or new maps), rather than just user made maps :)

Assault is now my new favourite map in GO btw :D

Use MSI Afterburner on your Intel Integrated Laptop Graphics. But I'd becareful if I were you.

I play CS:GO with stable 100 FPS on a 5 years old PC (HD4850 and Athlon X3)

The fail is that this version doesn't use the option of hiding, it's mostly fire/walk around, fire and fire.