No because quite a few bundle games come back again
Comment has been collapsed.
Then that's more games for everyone in the community
Comment has been collapsed.
Yet the winners of the giveaways would be happy to have that game.
Comment has been collapsed.
True, and i did that with Metro. Still, maybe they want to show off ? A 0 value for such games ?
Comment has been collapsed.
You could avoid that by not being too clear about the time it takes.
People who want to misuse it for higher CV will not know how long they will have to hold on for it. Heck, the rules might even be changed in the meantime. So if you are out purely for the high CV, it is a pretty bad investment to buy budle games for example, as you simply don't know if they ever will be full value again (might be in another bundle in the meantime) and when.
But it would also stop a lot of games from being on the bundles list. Currently there are some nice games that have some neat savings with them occasionally, but the fact that they are not full value might stop people from giving them away.
Comment has been collapsed.
This argument comes up every time, but has it actually happened? I say give it a try. It can't be worse than the current floods that happen every time something goes on sale or gets bundled.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's just a number. I put 9 months as that's the time of pregnancy.
Comment has been collapsed.
The problem with that solution is, like xamtheking mentioned, bundle games tend to repeat, but also it will simply encourage people to wait 9 months or whatever the wait is and then flood the site to get huge amounts of contrib. It gives exploitation a waiting period, but it doesn't actually stop the bad behavior.
Comment has been collapsed.
Seems unlikely to me for someone to wait that long. And if we use LucasCs' time table, ut's even less probable.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's unlikely now, since there's no incentive, but this will create that incentive. Many people wait months for good sales, and this would be just a modification of that same behavior.
Comment has been collapsed.
A better suggestion would be to only take BTA bundle keys off the bundle list
Comment has been collapsed.
I gotta go to sleep. Tommorow i will read new posts and will try to extract some more suggestions (read OP).
Comment has been collapsed.
"A limit of how many bundeled games per a time frame can be given for the full value."
There is already a limit of how many bundled games can be given for full value. It's just that it's limited not by time, but by the other stuff you've given away. I much prefer that to be honest.
Comment has been collapsed.
Seems the thread died.
At least some suggestons were made and a discusson took place.
Comment has been collapsed.
58 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by k1mon
53 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by truthfullybug
252 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by WaxWorm
291 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by JX8
795 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by FranckCastle
364 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by Zepy
44 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by IronKnightAquila
96 Comments - Last post 50 seconds ago by ChimChakMan
9,620 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by CurryKingWurst
42 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by coleypollockfilet
542 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by shadowshiv
640 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by Vampus
49 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by madjoki
32 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by viaI
Is it a reasonable request to put up for consideration that the games from Bundeled List and Exploited List could be removed from it after a certian amount of time ? Say, 9 months ?
Suggestions made in this thread:
Comment has been collapsed.