Do you blacklist someone if he/she has VAC ban?
This is a giveaway site. I'm not required to maintain a "ratio" of any sorts. Using that skewed logic people of no level should be sitewide banned or something. Also, I always return a blacklist favor, even if I don't have to. Just an act of mutual courtesy.
Comment has been collapsed.
No. I have friends with vac bans on their account from several years ago. People change. Not going to spend the energy blacklisting everyone who has ever cheated or broken the law.
Just don't be a piece of sh*t on here and you're good in my book.
Comment has been collapsed.
Not
At a minimum, for this you need to open the user's steam profile, but I'm too lazy. In any case, even if I get interested in something and open it, I don't care.
He played with cheats and got banned. He received his punishment. Why should I do anything else?
Comment has been collapsed.
your really a super pony aren't you -or should be star
Comment has been collapsed.
Nope, cheating on SG is another story (e.g. multi accounts, suspicious GAs, or taking advantage of groups..)
Might block you on Steam tho but only, if I play the same games..
btw, sneaky ; )
cheers!
Comment has been collapsed.
I BL only for:
Comment has been collapsed.
No. This has nothing to do with steamgifts, so I don't see why I would blacklist them.
I'm not the kind who cares for punishment and retribution in most aspects other than as a way to reduce harm. If I blacklist them, it does nothing. They may not even know about it. Even if they do know, would that make them less likely to cheat in their games? I don't think anyone would make that connection and repent just because they can't access a fraction of a percent of the giveaways. I feel like I'm a bully if I kick someone who is already down for no legitimate reason.
If they are being shady on steamgifts or have given me trouble in the past, that's another story.
Comment has been collapsed.
No.
First off, there is the chance, though perhaps slim, that it's not a legitimate ban. Second off, I don't believe in once a cheater always a cheater. Sure there are some that will never stop, but serial cheaters like that will try and hide it by doing it on alt accounts, so odds are you won't even know.
Comment has been collapsed.
No, I don't give a shit really about VAC bans, I've learned it the hard way from CS:GO that VAC isn't a functional concept, plus I have friends who cheated but regret it. I only blacklist depending if you're an asshole or just giveaway those cheap 1p games from like giveeclub.
Comment has been collapsed.
But u cant get vac if u dont cheat...i mean, ita hard too
Comment has been collapsed.
I dont use blacklist,in this case it just wouldn't be very useful, as i would be blocking people access to more SP/ co op games than i would MP
in certain circumstances, i might consider running a private GA to avoid giving a VAC enabled game to VAC banned people, as to avoid any chance of ruining MP for everyone else.
I also tend to remove people from my steam friend list if they have a recent ban.
Comment has been collapsed.
TL;DR: I won't partake in this Orwellian BS, so I don't care about VAC bans for my BL.
Long version:
VAC is creepy. And more generally, all client-side anti-cheat crap is creepy: it's basically a Trojan horse that somehow got good karma and gets to send whatever it deems "suspect" on your computer to random remote geeks who can do whatever they want with those data then.
For people who, at that point, still fail to see the harm in it: think unencrypted contents of your password manager. Or the connection cookie of your bank's website.
VAC gets a special creepiness mention for how Steam uses it as a Social Credit System though. They're probably walking on a very thin line with the GDPR there, as well.
I get client-side anti-cheat is (sadly) a "necessary evil" for many (but far from all) multiplayer games, still it's the core reason I don't play such games. Lastly, VAC in solo games is inexcusable. It very rarely happens but it's already way too much.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's possible, but only for some kinds of games: those where enough of the game logic happens server-side. That wouldn't really be an anti-cheat per se though, just normal security.
Minion Masters comes to mind as an example of a multiplayer game where client-side anti-cheat isn't needed. Although with the invisible units, maybe not so much anymore.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, this is one of the reason that I don’t play multiplayer games and it also goes to antivirus software.
Comment has been collapsed.
No, who cares if you cheated and got banned? It's your loss in the end.
Comment has been collapsed.
VAC ban is a good sign to avoid trading with somebody, or at least the person with the VAC ban should go first in a trade. I don't care what the giveaway winner does as long as they activate the game and mark it as received
Comment has been collapsed.
So. I was the first who voted for yes in this poll. Even if I never BL people for that ('-'
Comment has been collapsed.
No. I do not blacklist for that. It's not any of my business. A 14 year old boy could have cheated on a multiplayer game, then joined SG as a 20 year old who hasn't done anything stupid with their Steam account since. It's not fair to judge people like that.
Comment has been collapsed.
I might (because some weird people including myself think that cheating in multiplayer games is not cool, you know). But the said bans should be both multiple (I doubt the system would mistake several times for one person) and fresh, and 5+ years is hardly fresh.
Comment has been collapsed.
30 Comments - Last post 53 minutes ago by brivid0boy
450 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by klingki
7 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by xXSAFOXx
16,297 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by SebastianCrenshaw
52 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by adam1224
206 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by Joey2741
31 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by Pika8
282 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by IgotElbows
202 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by xkingpin
45 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by DarkRainX
7,979 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by eeev
137 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by TheAgonist00
46 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by Shanti
22 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by UnknownDepth
If you say of course, please take me to your blacklist, otherwise accept my invitation for the cheap giveaway! :))
Comment has been collapsed.