You state no reason or defense. The current system leaves people with more points than they can spend on games they truly want. With more and more bundles being released, this is more likely than ever. The system will be flooded with bundle points and when the games you truly want come along, there will be thousands of entries. Anyone with a brain, who actually cares about what it is they win, should agree with this plan.
Anyone who likes the status quo is illustrating the fact that they simply want free shit, no matter what it is.
Comment has been collapsed.
Hey I like free shit. And giving free shit a chance has taken me outside of my comfort zone. Sounds like a win for me.
Comment has been collapsed.
Suggestion: Stop assuming everyone wants what you want. Everything works just fine the way it is.
Comment has been collapsed.
Lol. Nobody cares what you want. Quit crying about it.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's not. It will continue to be flooded with more and more points as bundles continue to increase in popularity and when things you are actually interested appear, you will have no chance at entering them. The points need to be lowered, or you need to be able to spend more points per giveaway.
Comment has been collapsed.
perhaps you do not have enough because you want to many games??
i do not like the point system for the reason the OP posted i think it really is to many,as the games i really want have 1,000's of entry and the only ones left for most part with lower entry is for good reason they are not that good of a game
none the less i am new so i never had a chance to vote on how the point system is but if a lot people like it that is fine
i think it is broken and could use less earning as i have plenty of points to enter what i want and i end up using extra to enter what i mildly want for a better chance of winning a game
none the less this is my opinion but i still love the site as the point system the way it is not broken i just think it cold use less of them
that way people really have to decide what they want instead entering so many,i have only been a member for about 2 weeks and already almost entered 200 drawings that is about 100 a week
i just think it would be better if i say only had 100 points and there is 4 games i want and they all cost 30 points or more i would chose wisely the way it is now i pretty much enter about 15 or so a day what if i was only allowed to enter say 5 at most
anyhow that just how i feel and i am sure plenty of people like how it is now and it does work but just because something works does not mean it is perfect
Comment has been collapsed.
Some sort of IQ test before being allowed to join would be interesting. lol
Comment has been collapsed.
I can see what the OP wants. He wants points to be reduced so that there are less people entering the giveaways he enters.
Comment has been collapsed.
OR you could try to join private giveaways and private groups that have very few people in them that give you a far better chance at winning that game and just leave the rest of us to go for what ever games we damn well please. Some of us have a wide selection of game types we like and are interested in many games.
Comment has been collapsed.
You would also be able to enter less giveaways which could potentially make the higher chance to win negligible. This would only really be true for public giveaways or mass giveaways during holidays though.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes, getting less points won't increase the chances of winning the popular games by much. But maybe he likes niche games, or there's a specific game he'd love in a bundle he missed. Giveaways of weaker games get only a couple hundred participants even with the modern system of ("dish out points for anything") surplus of points.
There aren't too many games (and giveaways of games) people truly want to win here. Points would be adequate to participate in all the giveaways of those few games.
Comment has been collapsed.
No one is forcing you to use your points... o_O
You could always, you know, not use them.
Comment has been collapsed.
I got more points than i can use half the time, but that's just me... Everyone is different, like wanting or owning different games.
Comment has been collapsed.
What's with all the negativity? Surely everyone wants better chances at winning their favourite games in exchange for not participating in games of milder interest.
From giveaway creator's perspective, they can be sure that whoever wins his game will be happy about it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Haha, we'll all be sure to NOT enter the giveaways that you are in, champ.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think the point generation is fine as it is. 5% of each created giveaways means there's 95% of them you can't afford to enter. Of course if you already have tons of games, like I do, you end up not having that many you could enter anyway.
I'm sitting at 300 points most of the time and I don't feel the need to spend them all. I enter for games I actually want to play and maybe from time to time a game I'm on the fence about. (I figure if I get it for free it will be the perfect opportunity to try it out.)
Comment has been collapsed.
I agree that points should be lowered. We'd have a better chance of winning because there wouldn't be a thousand entries. They should do it more like Game Miner does and give you a 50 point cap unless you giveaway games and up your level. The way it is now on Steam Gifts there are tons of cheap games for only 5 points and they get too many entries. That's why people join exclusive giveaway groups to have a better chance of winning because there are less people entering.
Comment has been collapsed.
Point gain tend to very according to bundles, specially humble bundles. Sometimes you have plenty to spend, some other days you have almost none. It's believe fine as it is.
Comment has been collapsed.
I too have MUCH more points than I really need, and I do agree with less points meaning people would put some thoughts into which GAs they enter (meaning, possibly, the people who are very much interested in the game in question would have better chances of winning).
I can only speak for myself, however. I might be perfectly fine with just 100 pts, while others might need much, much more points to enter all the GAs they want.
Comment has been collapsed.
812 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by PicoMan
30 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by IAMERROR404
315 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
2,046 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Gamy7
35 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Sunshyn
163 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by WangKerr
1,533 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by Whoosh
702 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Vincer
151 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by BlackStark
27 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by PicoMan
16 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by workerofsecret
23 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by antidaz
496 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by LastM
838 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by Thexder
Does anyone else think the # of points awarded should be lowered again? I'd rather be given fewer points and invest those in games I really want then the current system where I have more points than I know what to do with. If I wanted I could throw my points into random giveaways for games I'm mildly interested in and have a chance of winning over someone who really wants the game. Less points = more chances of winning what you really want.
Edit: It's been awhile since I've seen such blatantly ignorant negativity. If you don't have something constructive to say, leave. This plan would result in a better chance to win things YOU ACTUALLY WANT. If you're only interested in winning something for free and you don't care what it is, then go ahead and blindly insult me like the rest. You're only hurting yourself.
Comment has been collapsed.