Browse
Category
DiscussionsUncategorized

The Crysis Test

Closed
JSharpiie

Recently I obtained a copy of "Crysis Warhead". From what I had heard, it was one of the most taxing games on the market. I was reluctant to trade for it, but when I first booted it up, I was surprised to find that I ran it amazingly! I can't run GTA4 or SR3 though, so can anyone give me a good explanation as to why I can run Crysis and not those two?

12 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

24 Comments
JMJqueseyo

probably graphics card

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
JSharpiie

What? Crysis is much more taxing on my graphics card than the other two games.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
Squeale

Because you're on a AMD processor for sure, or on a Core2Duo or so.

Crysis takes less CPU but more GPU part.

Also, it scales well with you hardware, only gamer/enthusiast settings are taxing.

Which resolution you're on?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
JSharpiie

1200x600

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
Squeale

Which kind of screen has such a resolution?
But no wonders with it so low, that you can play the game good, even a budget card will do fine at low res.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
JSharpiie

My natural screen res is 1200x800, I'm playing it on 1200x600 for the cinematic effect.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
Jonex

Actually Crysis Warhead is a really well optimised game (by comparison to Crysis). If you try and play Crysis you'll notice a significant FPS drop despite having the same visuals :P

Crysis and Warhead are designed for the PC. GTAIV and SR3 got the short end of the stick when it came to development priority across multiple platforms.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
JSharpiie

Really? I hadn't known that, I just knew gameplay wise Warhead was better, not to mention I've been looking to get Crysis Wars anyways.

And Psycho is a boss.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
Jonex

I've done some tests myself on two different systems. Crysis came up short despite it being the older game. Warhead is overall an amazing game, but it isn't as "varied" as Crysis though :P That's my only problem with it.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
JSharpiie

What do you mean varied? Should I go buy Crysis?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
Jonex

I liked the length and the break up of the Crysis campaign more than the Warhead campaign which was all about action and then seconds later some more action (if you know what I mean). Warhead felt like an expansion in terms of length and the story was on a smaller scale compared with Crysis.

I would buy Crysis, definitely. But Warhead is still a great game :)

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
JSharpiie

I really bought Crysis (well, traded for) because I loved Crysis 2 on the PS3, back when I was still a naive console gamer. I had so much fun ripping through hoards of enemies in the crysis suit, and I feel like Warhead is a little more open, if you spend all your time playing the first mission and never doing objectives.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
Jonex

Well there's something we had in common, former naive PS3 Crysis 2 gamer haha.

That's something great about both games though, there's always an extended fight waiting for you if you want to take it on. There are a couple similar extended fights in the first Crysis, but sure, there's more to fight in Warhead ^^

Even in Crysis 2 though, it still surprises me. Have you ever used the Gauss attachment on the rifles?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 11 months ago.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 years ago.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
JSharpiie

From what I have heard from everyone who owns it, it still is.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
Squeale

It is, still - but my 7970's dont care.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 years ago.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
Jonex

It's still quite demanding, but I reckon that's to do with poor optimisation across different rigs.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
FatGoldfish

Warhead is awesome! It runs smooth on extremely low on my P4.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
zombiesatemybrain

i even saw it once running (mostly) playable on a notebook with an 64MB ATI card.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
SHIV

crysis is the best tool. warhead was better optimised and so not as good as crysis for kicking the shit out of your pc.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
jmlt4jh

awesome

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.
Mavi

GTA 4 and SR 3 = bad ported games. the Crysis is less CPU demanding.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 12 years ago by JSharpiie.