If you plan on overclocking your cpu get sandybridge instead, also use the money you save on the i5 for an ssd, you will get alot more performance out of an ssd than you will get out of an i7.
Comment has been collapsed.
What benefit would getting a Sandy Bridge have? On Newegg, and i5 Sandy Bridge 3.4 Ghz (same clock speed as the Ivy Bridge on my wishlist) is actually more expensive. Are they more OC friendly?
Also, I was planning on getting an SSD, but later. It's not as important to me, and they're pretty expensive.
Comment has been collapsed.
Sandybridge is better for overcocking, ivybridge is better at stock clocks.
Comment has been collapsed.
if you don't plan on ever overclocking just go ivybridge
Comment has been collapsed.
It really depends on how much you want to push it. I'm not planning on pushing my processor too much (4.0 to 4.2) so I'm going with Ivy and a decent cpu cooler. With that same cooler however I could push a sandy farther because Ivy gets freakin hot a lot faster. But then again games don't really need a ton of processor.
Comment has been collapsed.
Games hardly even stress my cpu, let alone an i7, i have an i5 2500k and only oorly optimised games cause my cpu to be at even medium load.
Comment has been collapsed.
2 years from now my cpu will be dead and i will have got the next architecture, anyway the majority of the stress is on the graphics card.
Comment has been collapsed.
I lol @ your suggestions. You suggest an i7 over an i5 (which will not have any difference in his games), and then you suggest a GPU with 1GB vram instead of 2GB+ vram (which will have a much bigger difference). No more suggesting for your.
Comment has been collapsed.
But how much Vram does it ACTUALLY use and at what rez? Even at max settings Vram is at 6xxmb used on a 1gb card. Skyrim or Fallout NV with HD textures doesnt use all my Vram. Though I only have a 1680x1050 monitor so res will add more or less usage.
Comment has been collapsed.
You wont see any more noticeable performance increase from an i7 as you would from an i5, at least not enough to warrant the price. A small SSD would serve as a much better enhancer.
If you plan to OC heavily, go for sandy. My new i5 is @4ghz due to the temps, though its at 70C so I could go higher if I wanted.
70c using intel burn test*
Comment has been collapsed.
Click able rig
Is what I went with, though I RMA'ed the ram because one of the sticks was bad.
Got these instead.
Also got 5 off on the new ram which was nice.
Comment has been collapsed.
Unless your saving cash I agree about the z77 thing, but a lot of z67 boards cost the same as their z77 versions. As for PCI Express 3.0 it can be completely ignored. As of now and for a while the difference between PCI Express 3.0 and 2.0 is about 1 frame in a fully maxed game. No one will notice, plus PCIE 3.0 slots take 2.0 cards and visa versa, and a Sandy Processor in a PCIE 3.0 board just turns them into PCIE 2.0, so it can be ignored for now.
Comment has been collapsed.
I guess in that case its more for Upgrading in the future.
If you think by the time you want to upgrade anything, that you will just update it all, then I guess it really isn't an issue.
I upgrade single things at a time myself normally, so I got a Z77 and Ivy Bridge, both working great. I haven't even got into overclocking yet myself, but am planing on it.
Comment has been collapsed.
i5-2500K is sandy bridge and a bit better for overclocking than the ivy bridge counterpart.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm actually taking a break from building my new rig right now! Bought the same processor, saw that ASRock too its a great deal. Any particular reason you went with the EVGA version of the 670, a lot of people seem to love the OC'd FTW though I went with a non-reference version that would work with my case better which is the same price as the one you picked but its not a stock version. Other than that I'm throwing a small SSD in mine to work as an OS boot drive and a cpu cooler to let me push that i5-3570K to 4.0 comfortably but also for aesthetics.
Comment has been collapsed.
Just make sure that ram will fit in with a CPU heatsink. I'm not sure how close the ram slots are, but the ram you picked would have been too tall for my motherboard + Hyper 212 heatsink. I went with this ram instead: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E1682023146
Comment has been collapsed.
oops i deleted a number off the link when trying to make it clickable.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231461
Comment has been collapsed.
431 Comments - Last post 60 seconds ago by easytarget62
158 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by DeliberateTaco
47,171 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by Calibr3
8 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by Icepick87
8,604 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by FranckCastle
468 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Wasari
171 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Doshmaku
3,478 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Chris76de
146 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Eudoxia
110 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by meneldur
387 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Eudoxia
3 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Mhol1071
17 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Swordoffury
1,394 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by Vasharal
So I figured that a major update to my rig was in order, and I plan to replace almost every part of it. I've already come up with a wishlist on Newegg, and I'm pretty sure that everything will work fine together but I would like some other opinions. Any advice or criticism is welcome.
Comment has been collapsed.