"Pretty soon?" The day has already arrived. You have only to search the blogosphere.

It says that by clicking accept you certify that you don't have that problem.

I have OCD (formally diagnosed). I have filed a discrimination complaint against NCsoft.

Demagogue? I think not. Look it up. I don't want power. I want fair value for my money spent.

A clause like you suggest would have been worded that an individual is responsible for their own actions and that NCsoft disclaimed responsibility for medical treatment caused by such actions. Such clauses have appeared in many game licenses and I have no problems with such. This is worded quite a bit differently.

Prevent abuse of the game? In what way? If I have paid for service without any contractual limitations on how much that service may be used in a given time period, how can I abuse that?

I wanted to be able to play the game that I paid for access to, not be subject to fraud claims for saying that I don't have a condition that I have been diagnosed with.

Since you're such an expert on contract law, please explain to me how I can certify that I do not have a history of compulsive behavior when I have been diagnosed with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Asperger's Syndrome?

I'll believe that when RIAA and the MPAA (and their UK equivalents) stop treating the people who purchase their content as guilty until proven innocent. I remember hearing about a case from a few years back where a little old lady in the UK was convicted of copyright infringement because she forgot to terminate her internet and unplug her AP when she sold her computer and somebody else came along and started file sharing on the unsecured WiFi.

RIAA and the MPAA are spending more than ten times what they recover on infringement actions, sometimes suing people who don't even own a computer, other times seizing websites of individuals who are providing properly licensed downloads (shorty after Obama decreed that ACTA should be enforced without submitting it to Congress), and you expect me to believe that if I lie to a company and agree to a contract that says I don't have a disability which I clearly have that they'll never come after me?

Or to put this another way, they get to cover their backsides in a way that requires me to not be able to use their product after having paid for it, by way of covering my own?

I should not have to lie in a legally binding document in order to play a game that I've already paid for. Especially when that lie could be used to terminate my sole source of income were it to come to light.

but it's NOT on your head - this is the world we live in:
Bob trips over a 2 x 4 and Bill laughs at him
Bob picks up the 2 x 4 and cracks Bill over the head with it
it's not Bill's fault - it's not Bob's fault
it's Barney's fault - because Barney owns the lumber yard that cut the 2 x 4 and sold it to Bob, or Bill

and that stupid shit is why companies try to cover they ass with ridiculous disclaimers like that - because some fucking window licker is going to play the game for 14 hours straight and go do some stupid shit imitating the game and everybody starts crying for bans on video games and pop-sicles and battery powered fly swatters and not once ask the dumbass what his fucking problem is

(ummmm - sorry 'bout all that)