+1

The only people that run out of points are the people who enter giveaways they don't even want. I rarely drop below 200 points

I'm iffy on this. Maybe like every $10 = 1 point?

If they contribute a lot... then they don't really need the points, since they can buy the games they want for themselves :P

Why would someone give alot away on SteamGifts? :s

On a more serious note: Contributors can enter contributor giveaways. No need for increasing the point cap and being greedy, 300p is more than enough. Also, what would the contributor's cap be? Please, PLEASE, before "suggesting", think it through.

+1

No, I think point generation is good as it is right now. Don't really need to enter every single giveaway there is.

I'm against this as it will encourage despicable users to create fake private giveaways to boost their contribution value.

No, that would be just another reason for many people to abuse the contributor value

300 is already a lot lol. I rarely drop below like 150 or really even 200ish. The regen is already really high any how.

I'm pretty sure my maximum points could drop to 100 and I'd never run out so... at the rate points regenerate I don't see much value in this

+1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 !!!

Oh dear, can't believe nobody's said this yet - what on earth would you need more than a maximum of 300 points for to enter?! If you're sitting at 300 points already it means that you're not entering any giveaways, presumably because you're not interested in any. Raising the maximum number of points wouldn't change that.

I really think the points should be lowered, so people would only enter for games they really want to play.

i agree , each 10€ contribution raises max points to 310 , so you make 15$ game giveaway , you get +10 points max , next time you give a 5 $ game you will have + 320 max points

If you raise up points for contributors, you'll have more fake private giveaway, free games giveaway (Starvoid,...).

Remember that Men Of War Vietnam was free to and gave people $35 contribution.

No.

No. We need to lower the max P.

I'm ok with the 300 point limit but I wouldn't mind have more min case I need them.

The more contributions affect what a person can enter, the less giving away is about generosity. Contributor giveaways are more than enough.

For what?

If contributors get more points he start joining into giveaways for games what not want. I every day using max. 100 point. I dont know what u people want. All games? ...

The absurdity of the effects of thousands people logging in everyday and able too enter everything reduces everyones chance by...thousands. So lets stop trying too reduce everyones chance of winning.

SUGGESTION: CLOSE THIS STUPID THREAD!

300 points is more than enough! This seems like something unnecessary to put time towards :S

Suggestion: Remove those stupid brag points already.