I hope one day i will have enough willpower to read this
Comment has been collapsed.
Wouldn't have commented if I didn't. I understand that the whole "friends" thing will promote activity on the forums and such, but it seems like a lot of hassle for, essentially, a private giveaway. Is leaking really that big of an issue? It seems like a step toward a social networking site instead of a generous gifting site.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't think leaking has every been that big of an issue. And even a giveaway is leaked you can always tell who doesn't belong except for puzzle giveaways which wouldn't even apply to this update anyways.
Comment has been collapsed.
tl;dr: SG friends list, so you can share/invite to private giveaways
EDIT: Also, Suggestion: Replies counter on top bar.
Ex: (1) Replies
Comment has been collapsed.
It still feels kinda useless to me because it still feels to much like a group/private giveaway.
But even besides that I highly doubt people will be inviting random strangers to their giveaways anyways most if not all will be people they already know/their friends. It would seem more convenient if there was just a steam friends list giveaway thing, but then again you could just make a group for all your friends instead.
Comment has been collapsed.
but then again you could just make a group for all your friends instead.
I want to share giveaway A with three people, where I have only one of them in my Steam friend list, giveaway B with seven random people I have found interesting, then giveaway C with another people. New group for every giveaway?
Comment has been collapsed.
It would require too much clicking every time I would like to do such giveaway for different people I guess but meh, I'm just a lazy guy. Plus I can imagine drama "you picked him, but not me" if the giveaway is mentioned in one of chats... no, I think I wouldn't use that feature but maybe it could be handy for others.
Therefore, I'm not against, I just can't see any use for me in it right now.
Comment has been collapsed.
LOOL, drama, as if anybody cares about dramatic people being dramatic? :p they're just like little childs telling their former friends: ''you're not invited to my birthdayparty because blahblahblah and blah blah blah''...
and who gives a f*?
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't like the idea of having "Friend Giveaways" replace the contributor system. The reason being that, while they may do away with bundlers, they actually function in a rather different manner from the contributor system. Imo, keeping the first suggestion where bundle games can only contibute a percentage is a better solution. Having said that, the friend system is a nice idea on its own.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yea, I agree. If it came in as it's own it'd be okay.
However I don't see myself ever really using it.
Comment has been collapsed.
As I said in the official thread, the whole friends list thing doesn't actually have anything to do with solving the issue. Option 2 is more or less "remove contribution altogether". The list idea is good on it's own, but it can't be considered a replacement for contribution.
EDIT: Ok, ok, it's still a good idea on it's own. Probably a bit of work though, so more or less depends or whether you guys wanna take the time to code it. :P
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't see how this fixes bundle key giveaways at all? Unless option 1 was not the one about reducing value of bundle keys... (and even then I still don't see how)
Comment has been collapsed.
Nope still don't see it, unless you added a shed load of people who hadn't gifted bundle keys to site friend list and made a giveaway for them so it is as close as possible to the public with no bundle gifters.
Comment has been collapsed.
I like the idea of a list of friends and the opportunity to send "private" giveaways to them without having to share the link with each and every person. However, I don't think that this should substitute contributor giveaways. You can always try to check the profile of the winner, or ask him/her for some more info if you think that there is something wrong. In the worst case scenario, where you really really really don't want to deliver the game, you can drop your percentage received by users :(
Comment has been collapsed.
I like the idea of being able to make little lists. And since it won't affect either the Contributor Giveaways nor remove the private ones, I see no harm in adding it. A lot of people might think of it as an 'extra hassle' to make a giveaway, but I'm pretty sure there's also many people who'll find creative ways to use the new feature.
Also, epic fight indeed xD Reading it brightened my mood a bit.
Comment has been collapsed.
How long did you take to type all of these lengthy descriptions?
The addition of this friend feature might be great, it encourage people to be more active in the forum. More forum lurkers.
Comment has been collapsed.
it's starting to get complicated, just when i start to understand every option's value...:)
I think this is a very nice SG method for making a new kind of giveaways,
but as you said already "will not replace... to help against bundlers", i stick to option #1 as the best solution to what exactly had made you start all these threads and hunt for solutions anyway.. the bundle keys...
Comment has been collapsed.
Yup. Option 1 and no need to worry about the rest until adding site features.
Comment has been collapsed.
Friend list is not a bad idea. But I can see what kinda problems it may lead to... Every giveaway become so much more personal with hand picked lists and invites and if you're inviting like more than 20-30 people, most of the time you might forget a few people whihc may cause some problems afterwards.. Also it requires so much work to add people one by one for every giveaway you create, even more so if you create lots of giveaways and have a lot of friends... That being said, of course it is perfect for SG duels!
I have to add need of a blacklist is more urgent than a friend list and I'm sure you're aware of that since some people are already using blacklists getting special permission to do so.. Another problem with friend lists might be "invite begging". People might ask for invites and it's hard to reject in that case even if you don't want to coz it's like saying "You're not my friend!" clearly..
Another thing is, I made some friends through giveaways who were not familiar with me before winning or gifting. Using a list of friends will remove that possibility of making new friends from groups and it might hit new users even harder.
Please make every giveaway group/private/public visible in the profile of anyone "it doesn't have to be a working link". I don't see why they're hidden anyway, what are we actually hiding?
Multiple "cross-group" group giveaways is a great idea!
Add a blacklist feature and it is much much easier to manage than a friend list, you don't even need to change it everytime.
Please try to fix option 1 "contributor giveaways" first, which is they best option in my opinion so far, before introducing other options at the same time. One perfectly working system is much better than multiple half working systems..
Please punish abusers by removing exploited games value, not by suspending them 2 days only and letting them back with full value again.
Comment has been collapsed.
"Please punish abusers by removing exploited games value, not by suspending them 2 days only and letting them back with full value again."
This. This so much. I wouldn't mind permanently suspending them from the site if they intentionaly broke the rules (like those MW3 1 entry private giveaways and such)
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah they should hit them where it hurts them the most...contributor level.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's an interesting idea, would probably only be truly helpful and beneficial (in terms of winning giveaways, should be helpful as just another option to anyone trying to give away) to those users who are well known and post a lot in the forums already, or those that people know are heavy contributors already. More new members who haven't fully started commenting and talking yet or who are afraid of the forums will be left out of some giveaways.
But who's to say that's a problem?
Comment has been collapsed.
Im so lazy I had the compute read it to me lol(kinda painful on the ears, the text to speech not your post)
Anyways sounds kinda like group + private invite only easier. There will still be Contributor giveaways and people who exploit will keep on doing it, and people who dont will continue not too.
Comment has been collapsed.
42 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by Gamy7
16,480 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by Kenruyoh
2,129 Comments - Last post 15 hours ago by MeguminShiro
5 Comments - Last post 17 hours ago by adam1224
951 Comments - Last post 20 hours ago by Cauix
54 Comments - Last post 21 hours ago by GoatPimp
26 Comments - Last post 22 hours ago by lewriczin
25 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by xxxka
356 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by thenthomwaslike
174 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by Ev4Gr33n
135 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by CuteEnby
82 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by SirSage
9,770 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by Fluffster
14 Comments - Last post 48 minutes ago by m0r1arty
Important note: This is not an official announcement,
but simply my own thoughts. I think option #2 is not that bad, but requires more flexibility.
(Also, because no one reads it completely, I post it on top as well: "I don't think this will replace Contributor Giveaways to help against bundlers and cheating, but can just be an addition to current public, group and private giveaway types.")
This is how I would prefer it to look like instead:
So shortly, this is closer to private giveaways, but with the ability to share links through the site, with members you decide. Friend list will solely play the role of bookmarking. No messaging, no other features. Thus, no spam and annoyance.
Lets say I have 50 friends in friend list, but I want to limit giveaway to no more than 15 entries, because I like to give good chances to win. With the way described above, I'll be able to do so without adding person in Steam and waiting until they accept a request. And also without whole bunch of fifty people being able to enter my giveaways, as was suggested previouly.
Even those with no or small amount of games being given away may get links from someone, just for being awesome, helpful, friendly folk.
Private giveaways won't be replaced, they still have their need. For example, if you want to share the link to everyone on forum, if it's part of a puzzle, if you dropped it in one of your groups chat for active members only. Also, it may be hard to invite massive amount of people. New giveaway type is perfect for making a pleasant surprise to small bunch of people or even one user. Few examples:
Additional, possible (may not be implemented) features:
I don't think this will replace Contributor Giveaways to help against bundlers and cheating, but can just be an addition to current public, group and private giveaway types.
So whad'ya say, is this a terrible/good idea? What else can be added or something should be substracted from this suggestion? I'd like to hear your opinion.
Comment has been collapsed.