Important note: This is not an official announcement,

but simply my own thoughts. I think option #2 is not that bad, but requires more flexibility.

(Also, because no one reads it completely, I post it on top as well: "I don't think this will replace Contributor Giveaways to help against bundlers and cheating, but can just be an addition to current public, group and private giveaway types.")


This is how I would prefer it to look like instead:

  1. Similiarly, you can add someone to your friend list through their profile. One way only, meaning you will never be spammed with requests and will never have unwanted people in it. List will be viewable by you only.
  2. There will be new type of a giveaway. As long as giveaway is opened, you can invite people into it, either separately or all together from your friendlist.
  3. Even if you have link to such giveaway, you won't be able to see it without being invited at first. Can't be leaked.
  4. You can always check who you invited so far to either of your giveaways (list of invited people will be available for giveaway submitter). You'll be always sure you you didn't forget someone.
  5. As an invited person, you'll be able to see something like this - "Invites (2)" on your navibar, meaning you have two new, unchecked giveaway invites. Once you clicked on the link you got, according notification will disappear. However, you will always have history of invites, meaning you should be invited just once and then it's up to you to decide, whether to enter or not, before giveaway is closed.

So shortly, this is closer to private giveaways, but with the ability to share links through the site, with members you decide. Friend list will solely play the role of bookmarking. No messaging, no other features. Thus, no spam and annoyance.
Lets say I have 50 friends in friend list, but I want to limit giveaway to no more than 15 entries, because I like to give good chances to win. With the way described above, I'll be able to do so without adding person in Steam and waiting until they accept a request. And also without whole bunch of fifty people being able to enter my giveaways, as was suggested previouly.
Even those with no or small amount of games being given away may get links from someone, just for being awesome, helpful, friendly folk.
Private giveaways won't be replaced, they still have their need. For example, if you want to share the link to everyone on forum, if it's part of a puzzle, if you dropped it in one of your groups chat for active members only. Also, it may be hard to invite massive amount of people. New giveaway type is perfect for making a pleasant surprise to small bunch of people or even one user. Few examples:

  • It was a hard day, you are in a bad mood. Came to SG forum to shout at someone, but instead discovered a thread, where few people made awesome, hilarious comments. Your mood became better. And bam, none of them have Fortix in their library. How about a small surprise?
  • You made a one copy giveaway and invited just two users - so called "SG duel". Lets say those were xarabas and Toaster. Epic fight guaranteed, as well as a universe collapse, because none of them can loose.

Additional, possible (may not be implemented) features:

  • To share the link with the whole Steam group or even more than one. Remember that suggestion, multi-groups giveaways? This can do it.
  • Option upon creation, to make giveaway "visible". You still won't be able to enter if you weren't invited, but if someone shared URL with you (not via friend list sharing), comment section can be read.
  • Ability to invite someone without adding to freinds. Say, I want to invite user12345 one time for SotMC giveaway. No need to add at first and remove user afterwards - less clicks, more clean friendlist.
  • Field to add few words/lines about user you have added. In case your memory is bad. As always, viewable by you only.
  • Your ideas?

I don't think this will replace Contributor Giveaways to help against bundlers and cheating, but can just be an addition to current public, group and private giveaway types.
So whad'ya say, is this a terrible/good idea? What else can be added or something should be substracted from this suggestion? I'd like to hear your opinion.

12 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 month ago.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Never!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I hope one day i will have enough willpower to read this

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

same thought lol

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why are you in my head!? D=

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

phew..im not the only one here, who didn't read this ~

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Option 1 is the only thing I've read that makes sense.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You obviously didn't read it all.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Wouldn't have commented if I didn't. I understand that the whole "friends" thing will promote activity on the forums and such, but it seems like a lot of hassle for, essentially, a private giveaway. Is leaking really that big of an issue? It seems like a step toward a social networking site instead of a generous gifting site.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't think leaking has every been that big of an issue. And even a giveaway is leaked you can always tell who doesn't belong except for puzzle giveaways which wouldn't even apply to this update anyways.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Seems like an okay idea, but as others have stated this cannot replace Contributor giveaways, it only works as an additional option to what currently exists.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

tl;dr: SG friends list, so you can share/invite to private giveaways

EDIT: Also, Suggestion: Replies counter on top bar.

Ex: (1) Replies

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It still feels kinda useless to me because it still feels to much like a group/private giveaway.

But even besides that I highly doubt people will be inviting random strangers to their giveaways anyways most if not all will be people they already know/their friends. It would seem more convenient if there was just a steam friends list giveaway thing, but then again you could just make a group for all your friends instead.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

but then again you could just make a group for all your friends instead.
I want to share giveaway A with three people, where I have only one of them in my Steam friend list, giveaway B with seven random people I have found interesting, then giveaway C with another people. New group for every giveaway?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It would require too much clicking every time I would like to do such giveaway for different people I guess but meh, I'm just a lazy guy. Plus I can imagine drama "you picked him, but not me" if the giveaway is mentioned in one of chats... no, I think I wouldn't use that feature but maybe it could be handy for others.

Therefore, I'm not against, I just can't see any use for me in it right now.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Plus I can imagine drama "you picked him, but not me" if the giveaway is mentioned in one of chats...
Private giveaway might cause absolutely the same drama.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

LOOL, drama, as if anybody cares about dramatic people being dramatic? :p they're just like little childs telling their former friends: ''you're not invited to my birthdayparty because blahblahblah and blah blah blah''...

and who gives a f*?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't like the idea of having "Friend Giveaways" replace the contributor system. The reason being that, while they may do away with bundlers, they actually function in a rather different manner from the contributor system. Imo, keeping the first suggestion where bundle games can only contibute a percentage is a better solution. Having said that, the friend system is a nice idea on its own.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yea, I agree. If it came in as it's own it'd be okay.

However I don't see myself ever really using it.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As I said in the official thread, the whole friends list thing doesn't actually have anything to do with solving the issue. Option 2 is more or less "remove contribution altogether". The list idea is good on it's own, but it can't be considered a replacement for contribution.

EDIT: Ok, ok, it's still a good idea on it's own. Probably a bit of work though, so more or less depends or whether you guys wanna take the time to code it. :P

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't see how this fixes bundle key giveaways at all? Unless option 1 was not the one about reducing value of bundle keys... (and even then I still don't see how)

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't see how this fixes bundle key giveaways at all?
Read again.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nope still don't see it, unless you added a shed load of people who hadn't gifted bundle keys to site friend list and made a giveaway for them so it is as close as possible to the public with no bundle gifters.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I like the idea of a list of friends and the opportunity to send "private" giveaways to them without having to share the link with each and every person. However, I don't think that this should substitute contributor giveaways. You can always try to check the profile of the winner, or ask him/her for some more info if you think that there is something wrong. In the worst case scenario, where you really really really don't want to deliver the game, you can drop your percentage received by users :(

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I like the idea of being able to make little lists. And since it won't affect either the Contributor Giveaways nor remove the private ones, I see no harm in adding it. A lot of people might think of it as an 'extra hassle' to make a giveaway, but I'm pretty sure there's also many people who'll find creative ways to use the new feature.

Also, epic fight indeed xD Reading it brightened my mood a bit.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

10/10 would read again.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How long did you take to type all of these lengthy descriptions?

(I read it all and still missed the "I don't think this will replace Contributor Giveaways to help against bundlers and cheating, but can just be an addition to current public, group and private giveaway types.")

The addition of this friend feature might be great, it encourage people to be more active in the forum. More forum lurkers.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

it's starting to get complicated, just when i start to understand every option's value...:)

I think this is a very nice SG method for making a new kind of giveaways,
but as you said already "will not replace... to help against bundlers", i stick to option #1 as the best solution to what exactly had made you start all these threads and hunt for solutions anyway.. the bundle keys...

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yup. Option 1 and no need to worry about the rest until adding site features.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 years ago.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Friend list is not a bad idea. But I can see what kinda problems it may lead to... Every giveaway become so much more personal with hand picked lists and invites and if you're inviting like more than 20-30 people, most of the time you might forget a few people whihc may cause some problems afterwards.. Also it requires so much work to add people one by one for every giveaway you create, even more so if you create lots of giveaways and have a lot of friends... That being said, of course it is perfect for SG duels!

I have to add need of a blacklist is more urgent than a friend list and I'm sure you're aware of that since some people are already using blacklists getting special permission to do so.. Another problem with friend lists might be "invite begging". People might ask for invites and it's hard to reject in that case even if you don't want to coz it's like saying "You're not my friend!" clearly..
Another thing is, I made some friends through giveaways who were not familiar with me before winning or gifting. Using a list of friends will remove that possibility of making new friends from groups and it might hit new users even harder.

My suggestions:

  • Please make every giveaway group/private/public visible in the profile of anyone "it doesn't have to be a working link". I don't see why they're hidden anyway, what are we actually hiding?

  • Multiple "cross-group" group giveaways is a great idea!

  • Add a blacklist feature and it is much much easier to manage than a friend list, you don't even need to change it everytime.

  • Please try to fix option 1 "contributor giveaways" first, which is they best option in my opinion so far, before introducing other options at the same time. One perfectly working system is much better than multiple half working systems..

  • Please punish abusers by removing exploited games value, not by suspending them 2 days only and letting them back with full value again.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This gets my support for 100%!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

^ Agreed Toasty :)

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 years ago.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"Please punish abusers by removing exploited games value, not by suspending them 2 days only and letting them back with full value again."

This. This so much. I wouldn't mind permanently suspending them from the site if they intentionaly broke the rules (like those MW3 1 entry private giveaways and such)

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I wholeheartedly agree with this.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think that the idea of a blacklist is not bad, although I only ever had use for it in the context of a single giveaway.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I really like these suggestions. Also, I wasn't aware suspensions only last 2 days :S That definitely needs to be longer.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah they should hit them where it hurts them the most...contributor level.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

^ we want giveaways for multiple groups at once :)

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This gentleman here had some nice ideas.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm not a fan on the collateral damage on option #1 so I find option #2 and your variation very interesting. A +1 from me, Hichigo.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's an interesting idea, would probably only be truly helpful and beneficial (in terms of winning giveaways, should be helpful as just another option to anyone trying to give away) to those users who are well known and post a lot in the forums already, or those that people know are heavy contributors already. More new members who haven't fully started commenting and talking yet or who are afraid of the forums will be left out of some giveaways.

But who's to say that's a problem?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I manged to read up until number 2.)

Then I kind of forgot what I read at number 1.)

I'll get through it eventually, I promise!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Im so lazy I had the compute read it to me lol(kinda painful on the ears, the text to speech not your post)

Anyways sounds kinda like group + private invite only easier. There will still be Contributor giveaways and people who exploit will keep on doing it, and people who dont will continue not too.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

can anyone post a tl;dr version?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+∞

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 12 years ago by Hichigo.