If I have to choose only one, which one should I get for story?

10 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

New Vegas, it has better plot, characters, writing, followers, world, gameplay and dlc. Also it runs generally better out of the box.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Both, but if that's not possible then I'd recommend playing Fallout 3 first. (also Fallout 3 is my personal favorite, the FNV "cowboy" theme gets old and sometimes tedious gameplay just wasn't that appealing)

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The story in Fallout New Vegas is better, but the overall experience is better in Fallout 3. My opinion - get both.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

New Vegas.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

New Vegas is the real Fallout 3.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yep.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As someone that has played and loved all of the FO games, I'd say Fallout 3 is a a lot better when it comes to storyline. However I feel that New Vegas keeps you busy for far longer, there's so much to do, so much to see ( and it'll be far more nuttier and fun with Wild Wasteland trait), plus there are so many mods for New Vegas which makes the gameplay even cooler. Both are worth a play but my opinion is

Storyline: FO3>NV

Fun factor: NV>FO3

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Shakes fist at Fallout 3

Just won F3: Mothership Zeta, got excited & booted up F3 (last save was right before the endgame thing), headed straight to the alien crash site and... nothing.

Loaded to just after I had been at the Citadel... nothing.

Loaded a way early save where I hadn't been anywhere in the area, ran through the desert to the wreck and... nothing. Vaporized some critters with the alien blaster. Ragequit, posting here, next up: crack open a beer and go back to Project Zomboid. :)

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Did you activate the DLC on the Fallout 3 startup module and not just in Steam ?

I figured out way too late on my first Fallout 3 playthrough that I was playing Vanilla edition even though I purchased the GOTY. Just because I didn't activate the various DLCs on the little interface that pops when you start the game.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm going to try that right now...

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That worked, thanks! :D

Zeta was unchecked under Load Files.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Happy I could help !! That's exactly the problem I had.. I would have thought they'd auto-include the DLCs on the GOTY.. nope.. nothing was checked. At least the game was fun enough for me to play it again with the extra content.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Guys he said for story! Even if you prefer Falliut 3 the story is GARBAGE, honestly feels like it was written by amateurs...

Get NV if you want a good story.

Also obligatory quest amount photo

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In my opinion, Fallout 3 has better story but New Vegas has better gameplay...I think you should play both so it's hard to say which one choose first.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Fuck the rules. Both (Obsidian's)

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

3

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

New Vegas cause it actually works.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Since I've had both and beaten both to death with a rubber fish, I can clearly say that Fallout 3 is superior. There is literally NO difference in gameplay mechanics, character development or customization. Even most of the enemies are the same. All NV has over 3 is more of a weapon choice.
From an atmospheric look, 3 actually FEELS like a Fallout game whereas NV just feels like you are running around an already existing desert area that looks nothing like the aftermath of a nuclear holocaust. I mean, in 3 you actually see the bombs and can even set one off. NV you don't even see a physical reference to one. And the factions in NV was completly useless as well. One more thing about characters. You have always been a Vault Dweller that leaves their vault in the past games. NV strays from that lore making it seem less like a Fallout game and more like a generic post-apocolyptic shooter with RPG (no pun intended for certain weapons) elements.

I could go on, but it would make it into a wall of text and I know that nobody like to see that.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The biggest issue I had with Fallout 3 was that the wasteland felt to pristine. It's been about 200 years since the war and people have been out of the vaults for roughly 150 years but almost nothing has been touched, at times it feels like the bombs fell last week. The game also ignores far too much of the series story, the main villains are a group that was destroyed 30 years prior in the ending of fallout 2.

Fallout 3 is a good stand-alone game or a franchise reboot, New Vegas on the other hand feels like a proper sequel to fallout 2.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The story in 3 felt like a parody of 1 and 2 to me personally, I had fun with the game but it was sorta sad if viewed as a sequel, I am actually confused because some people here are saying the story in 3 is better then NV...to me it felt like shoddy writing, kinda like it was thrown in last minute with no actual reason for being. It was so black and white that it was kinda cringe worthy. Like most Bethesda games in needed a crap ton of mods because it also lacked a decent amount of quests, game felt empty...

That said...fun sandbox I guess haha.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"literally NO difference in gameplay mechanics"

Sure if you ignore ammo types, iron sights, an actual useful speech mechanism, special attacks for melee and unarmed, companion system, Hardcore mode, etc...

"From an atmospheric look, 3 actually FEELS like a Fallout game whereas NV just feels like you are running around an already existing desert area that looks nothing like the aftermath of a nuclear holocaust."

Nope, if anything Fallout 3 feels nothing like a Fallout game, I started to doubt while playing it if the devs even ever played Fallout 1 and 2....

"You have always been a Vault Dweller that leaves their vault in the past games. NV strays from that lore making it seem less like a Fallout game and more like a generic post-apocolyptic shooter with RPG (no pun intended for certain weapons) elements."

Funny, most people who have played both 1 and 2 feel the opposite, F3 basically tossed the lore aside while NV brought it back, hell NV was written by the people who wrote Fallout 1 and 2 even(at least some of them I believe...). Fallout 3 felt like a generic post apocalyptic game, it was basically Oblivion with guns, and yeah it was fun but its not near better then NV, NV felt like a true sequel and 99% of fans agree on that.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"feels like a fallout game" compared Need for Speed maybe, because you clearly are not comparing it to Fallout 1, 2 or tactics.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Fallout NV all the time !!!

FAILout 3 is nice, but the real quest sucks!

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It hurts me inside to say this, but if you go for story you should go for New Vegas. Sidequests and atmosphere in Fallout 3 is still much better than in New Vegas (my opinion). I said it already in another post but it took me 3 playthroughs (+DLCs) in New Vegas to "learn" to enjoy it like I enjoyed Fallout 3.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

An old series fan opinion: New Vegas. For storylines, for atmosphere, for everything. Ultimate is much better. May lady Life Luck be with you!

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i would say Fallout 3 only because i thought t had a better balance of game play and story

Vegas has a decent story but the game play is kinda boring there is less to explore less to see and do and most the dlc is pretty weak

at least with 3 it has pretty good dlc though operation anchorage is okay

but this is just imo

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Fallout 3 has that WOW factor,like the first time you leave the vault.I just loved the post-apocaliptic atmosphere and the soundtrack.The Wastland in NV is just boring,and the quests are pretty much the same.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Agreed, I got more playtime out of 3. The atmosphere just felt better.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

over 100s of hours on my Xbox 360 its a well worth game

sadly cannot say the same for NV cause my shit got stolen... again.. -_- thats why i love steam)

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Fallout 3 has compatibility issues with windows 7 and windows 8 so beware. I don't know about New Vegas.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In my case a little googling around helped me fix the problems under Win7 64bit.. worked like a charm after that.

10 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.