How hard would it be to implement such a feature? I think it would be of great help when choosing giveaways to enter.

13 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Why?

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why not?

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

because not

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because yes.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Mein Fuhrer!

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'll be honest, metascore is pretty awful, especially with so many indie games going up. Its hit or miss whether a reviewer who gets picked to review the game actually "clicks" with the game, which can lead to unworthy bad scores cluterring it up.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you need to use Metascore to find out what games you want, you don't really shouldn't be playing games. Let alone entering giveaways and lowering the odds for everyone who wants the game for the game, in stead of for the score.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That ^

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

QFT

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Metascore is terrible, 2 thumbs DOWN!!!

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

But the metascore for metascore is really, really low...Which begs the question: Is it accurate? If it is, then shouldn't the score be higher?

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you think about that for too long, the universe might collapse.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You're acting like everyone will suddenly change to this. It will be an option.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No, sir. I don't like it.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Watched that Ren and Stimpy yesterday on Netflix :D

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Truth be told, I am not a fan of this either. I personally never use metascore, or any actual game rating site for anything more that release dates.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You choose your games you want to play by metascore?

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I choose giveaways to spend my excess points on by metascore.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just beause you think it's a great idea, doesn't mean it actually is.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just because you don't think it's a great idea doesn't mean it's bad

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yea actualy it realy is a bad idea. If you only chose games based on a score and not because they look appealing to you then should stop playing games. The whole idea is pointless. Just go to metacritic and look its score up if you care for it so much. Implementing such a useless feature will only waste server processing.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What if I chose a game based on its metascore and enjoyed it more than someone who found it appealing? Maybe you should stop telling people what to do.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Highly doubtfull. Besides it remains a pointless idea.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I find it amusing how you keep saying it's "pointless" even though you never provided any basis for that, except that I "should stop playing games".

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"Just go to metacritic and look its score up if you care for it so much. Implementing such a useless feature will only waste server processing."

Reading is hard huh?

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Seriously? That was your reasoning?
That's like saying bicycles are pointless because "just go by foot".
Additional server load is one reason against the idea, assuming people would actually use this feature. It doesn't make it pointless, however.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well it appears many are against your suggestion, so that's a major reason not to implement it...

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The current sorting is good. Don't change things working...

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Actually, the current sorting is... non-existent.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sorting by time left till the end of the giveaway and/or name is a perfect sorting.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

dito

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Seriously. Sorting by Metascore? Why don't we just have Nickelback playing in the background on the site instead?

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You can do that?
/me looks at lokonopa with glee and sparkles in his eyes

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Pfft...Nickleback? Why not Nyan??? That would be AWESOME. http://nyan.cat/ <---Just this constantly!

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hey if we get metascore sorting, we can get nyan.cat music constantly!

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'd rather have Nickelback! >:|

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hmm....I guess.

13 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 13 years ago by DrKoljan.