I think a joypad is a lot more comfortable than mouse and keyboard. Just like I prefer my sofa over a chair.
Comment has been collapsed.
I do use a controller since I'm not too used to KB+M. I don't play competitive shooters so its all good.
Comment has been collapsed.
Nope, you're not alone. I play some shooters with my gamepad when I just want to relax. The controls are more streamlined, and I get to lay back in my chair. For example, Bioshock.
If the game's a twitch shooter, though, then a gamepad isn't even an option.
Comment has been collapsed.
Borderlands 2 is very comfortable to play with a xbox controller, plus it can be quite accurate.
Comment has been collapsed.
Ha-ha-ha, you're the funny one :) I prefer single-player over multi-player by some reasons. One of them - my laggy 3G internet. I just wanted to say something like "It's too boring to play VERY HARD or even NIGHTMARE and beat the game without any sweat at all.
As for competitive multi-player, I have no issues about being pwnd in any way. You might add me as a friend though. Maybe we'll have a battle or two... If I have games you play, of course :)
Comment has been collapsed.
" 'cuz I feel sort of boredom when I play too god at FPS, so I might need some handicap to return fun to my gameplay"
just wow.. so do you play any competitive shooters or just single player shooters? You might try a career as pro if you are so godlike with kb+m :)
@Topic: kb+m all the way.
Comment has been collapsed.
if you want a game where the ai beats you 99% of the time, get s.t.a.l.k.e.r.
Comment has been collapsed.
Everyone has different tastes, I would never switch my sweet Logitech G500 for a controller. Also I am more of a strategy/RPG person, even though I have played Counter Strike for 10 years on semi-pro level. :)
But there are some games, for whose I would really like to get controller, for example Giana Sisters, which I am playing now, but sadly, do not have the buck to get it anytime soon.
Comment has been collapsed.
From my experience on Battlefield on the PC, if you don't play cleverly, use cover, hide as much as possible, try to flank you enemy and reposition often, you will die. If you go out on the middle of the field you will instantly die. So you really need to be careful and be smart about your every move. It's much easier to run from cover to cover and crouch behind walls and then stand to shoot a few bullets and hide again with a keyboard.
When I look at my friend play Battlefield on the console, a lot of people just run around in plain sight and there's no real sense of danger. You just run straight for the objective and shoot the people you see. You don't really need to use cover and there's less strategy involved.
Comment has been collapsed.
Sometimes I wish I had a 360 controller so I could use Alan Wake's freelook mode, I've seen some amazing screenshots come out of that
Comment has been collapsed.
I use a gamepad whenever possible for a couple of reasons.
Comment has been collapsed.
its fine if it works for you, but theres no chance a controller will ever be better than a mouse and a keyboard for competitive multiplayer shooters.
if any company would mix pc and console servers for a shooter, console company would bankrupt, cuz all their customers would get completely raped.
I know its a bit off your topic, but thats my honest opinion when people talks about pc/console for shooters.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, if we talk about shooters, it's uncommon to see a port that wouldn't work with mouse better than gamepad.
But there are plenty of reasons you might want to use gamepad in shooters. One of them, and probably the strongest one - Local Multiplayer. There's nothing better than local multiplayer. And it's impossible to play on more than one mouse. Unless I'm wrong. But even if I am, it's much more comfortable with gamepads anyway.
Comment has been collapsed.
65 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Sachys
2,937 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by codasim
321 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by Ghoztx9
29 Comments - Last post 54 minutes ago by skylarkblue1
193 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by reigifts
31 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by EloyOn
366 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Aliaxi
4 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Karfein
30 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Kanephren
5 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by tungmapu
5 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Delisper
568 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Ignition365
62 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by Vampus
628 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by pinlias
One recent topic on forum made me feel something I'd like to express. Unfortunately, that topic was closed by TS, so I'd like to start mine instead. So... :)
One guy who had a lot of shooting practice during his service in the army forces told that playing shooters with controller, though is not realistic at all, is more realistic then scoring series of headshots some players might achieve in 180-degree-turn-jump being 200+ meters afar from their targets, while it is impossible while shooting live ammo, especially if you run or jump with a gun.
Indeed, targeting with analog sticks might make you miss a lot. But with practice you might make it miss less and even aim pretty good. Isn't it a challenge? Isn't it a mastery?.. OK, this might be just another type of grind some masochistic players like me like to undertake. But in my case it makes me get more fun from game, 'cuz I feel sort of boredom when I play too good at FPS, so I might need some handicap to return fun to my gameplay :)
Am I the only one who feels like that? Feel free to express your opinions. And, please, be polite as much as it's possible. I don't like my thread turning in another field of holy war between controller- and kb+mouse-players.
Thanks a lot :)
UPD: Fixed a "god" typo. It was meant to be "good" instead. Sorry for inconvenience :(
Comment has been collapsed.