i dont know!!
but for my limited experience in linux you can make it dance if you got the skill.
i use it as a faster/safer internet machine. my family got used to it coming form windows and MacOS, gave them similar GUI. and i can troubleshoot linux for them
Comment has been collapsed.
I can write a big list of diferences between Linux and Windows but i tink u need google it. Cuz have lot diferences.
I not blame you if u like use more windows than linux, Microsoft pay lot ppl to make u use windows. But in summary Linux have a very robust OS, lot less bugs. You have many Desktop managers, and can choose what pleases you . You can customize everything.
Windows have a bether video card suport, and more games suported.. I tink is only it the Windows advantages.
Personally i use Windows to play and Linux to work. Some games run natively on linux then this games i play in linux ^^
( i realy not know mutch about MacOS, but Linux and MacOS are Unix based )
Comment has been collapsed.
Speaking of windows, 7 support ends on 13 january 2015, yay! :D
Comment has been collapsed.
There's a very small userbase for it, which results in very few games and other software being ported to it, which results in a very small userbase. It's going to be a self perpetuating cycle for a while.
Comment has been collapsed.
heard about bloatware?
for example, let's think that i am dumb and all i need is to surf in internet for some lulz and play games... i don't need graphical editors, text editors, audio players and such stuff that aren't related to surfing and games, but when i install windows 8.1 i got 20 Gb of my harddisk space consumed by unnecessary stuff that i won't use... and this hellish metro ^^
btw, same thing is now in ubuntu, which i left cause they started to do similiar things with programs which i liked... after another distroupgrade they just removed apps which i was using by another same apps...
so i moved to another linux distribution... and if i need some program i simply can install it, but for archlinux i needed some efforts to be able to maintain it...
simple as it is... if you want just to use pc as gaming rig or surfing browser, so windows is ok, but if you want to tune os for yourself then linux.
P.S. i still have windows 8.1 installed for moments when i need to play games, though developers releasing more and more games for linux :) (thanks to steam i guess)
Comment has been collapsed.
it's free, more customizable, not bloated with crap, and you have various distros and desktop environments to choose from.
P.s: check ElementaryOS, I'm sure you'll like it.
Comment has been collapsed.
You can make a computer do almost anything with linux IF you are willing to put in the work. There are many things that you just cannot do in windows, raw network card control is the first thing that comes to mind. MacOS is actually based in BSD, an operating system very similar to linux but is heavily locked down.
All of this said lunux can be VERY hard to work with if you are not tech savvy, I've had cases where is taken my months to figure out a system error. Once you have everything worked out it almost unstoppable but it WILL take a long time to get there.
Comment has been collapsed.
Free and easier to update. I can run one command on Linux and every program, driver, part of the system will be updated for me. On Windows I have to try and update every program individually and updating all your drivers is a pain in the ass (or even finding what version you're currently using or what needs updating).
Comment has been collapsed.
To be honest some of those things are not right.
1.Easier update - depends what linux we are talking about, what software etc.
2.much more stability - that depends on hardware You have, linux version and so on.
3.viruses - that is idiotic thin to talk You have to go on root and run virus. if ur typical user you will never have one. i have no viruses on windows 7 either.
4.driver problems - ex. some of graphic cards have problem and then You end up with 12 screens with strange resulotion on your desktop. i saw it on g105 ( that problem was on nvidia graphics , with the ubuntu driver was ok but no acceleration )
The talk about is linux really better is not important. Ive been attending linux users group in my town for several years, using different distros from ubuntu , debian to gentoo and arch. Not every distro is for normal user, i am programmer so i work on linux watch movies other stuff , but if i play games i dont try to be stubborn and try my games to work on linux i just relog on windows.
Comment has been collapsed.
I prefer linux for databases (performance and costs). Anything but things who need user interaction in a pc.
Its good in cellphones (Android is based on the Linux kernel), also for porformance and costs since it doesnt require drivers or another weird requerimenst for final users.
Comment has been collapsed.
free, faster, doesnt take much space on hdd, more stable than winfail, some games runs better on it (windfail games with wine), also you can easily count the number of malware's on linux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_malware#Threats :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Stability depends on your distro. If you use a rolling-release distro with testing repo enabled, it is likely that you'll have to deal with some issues after partial or full system updates
Comment has been collapsed.
"the internet is a mess" Yes, there it is. The point where you should stop thinking about it too much. Go to actual websites (not forums) for comparisons to get REAL facts.
Comment has been collapsed.
the main advantage I see is the package managers, almost all the programs you need installed from a repository instead of searching for them, dependencies automatically calculated and isntalled, and also kept updated witouth each program wanting a tray application to update itself.
Comment has been collapsed.
First thing it's the price. Also, you know Android is Linux?
Comment has been collapsed.
Android isn't really an OS. Its more of a basis, upon which other OSes are built, sort of like Unix.
Comment has been collapsed.
Err.... no. Android is definitely an OS and other OS are not generally built upon Android. (There are custom variants of Android though, like LineageOS and FireOS)
Edit: LOL! I just realized this old thread has been necroed
Comment has been collapsed.
by any chance have you tried Wine? Its not an emulator, but just translates the underlying commands to their nix equivalent. Doesn't work well for me on all things, but it has kept me from having to switch computers on occasion.
Comment has been collapsed.
Wine may not be an emulator strictly speaking, but it is the same for me. If my software doesn't work natively and needs some tricks and hacks to work (moreover not always properly), I'm not interested. Windows has enough customsiation capability for me to be comfortable with it, to the point where Linux would be more "painful" to use. However if I had to chose between MacOS and Linux I'd definitely go for Linux :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Hands down best thing about Linux is the ability to control it. I work with enterprise environments where we have to lockdown Windows for very specific uses (users can only use our alternative shell). Every time a Windows update rolls through, we have little other than Automated Tests to check if something they did to protect normal desktop users hasn't obliterated one of our protections to prevent the users from reaching a Windows Shell. We work with a very sensitive user base and being on the Windows/ .Net stack makes it hard to manage these devices as our customers expect. We are working on Linux version of our setup because we can turn off "Security" features that hinder our ability to limit access to certain features.
Heck for that matter we can uninstall those features altogether. linux offers this freedom and with advances like Flatpak, a ubiquitous platform similar to windows where the base operating system can be managed by a distributor but modified by developers and/or users.
EDIT: sorry saw it at the top and didn't think to check more than 2 posts up on date :(
Comment has been collapsed.
For me I can do lots of evil things with it using some opensource (pronounced free) software on it. Sometimes there is no windows free counterparts for my purposes.
Comment has been collapsed.
For example, rsync... almost out-of-the-box of all major distribution, simple to use (translated "command line utility"), does file sync across long distance network unattended... perfect fit for my purposes.
Comment has been collapsed.
1 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by Drkkk
7 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by nguyentandat23496
540 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by Ledyba
15 Comments - Last post 48 minutes ago by SecOps
1,763 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MeguminShiro
47,106 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by kbronct
49 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by blueflame32
177 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by AlexForestry
16,773 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by Riszu
682 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by Fitz10024
160 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by antidaz
790 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MayoSlice
70 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by cg
21 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Kyog
Alright, the internet is a mess with people spouting either love or hatred towards Linux. And I know that, for the most part, Linux allows for more user control.
My question is, then, why? What specific things are better with Linux over Windows (we're ignoring Windows 8 and all MacOS)? I'm not asking for broad statements like "it makes it easier to write complex command chains." I'd like to know why its easier to do that.
Thanks, SG.
Comment has been collapsed.