Games based on movies are generally worse - often being rushed and overpriced. At worst with a movie based on a game, you'll going to get a boring movie and spend like 20PLN or something on a ticket in cinema. With a bad game based on a movie, you can pay up to 4 times the money and instead of wasting 2 hours in a cinema, waste 4 or more trying to play through a boring, or even frustrating game - that's far worse.
With that said - most of movies, I watched based on games were at least entertaining. Not entirely faithful to source material, but Mortal Kombat, Resident Evil (3 of them), Hitman - I enjoyed all of them. Not really good movies, but I wasn't really feeling like I wasted my time. Hell, I even enjoyed DOOM... and some of crap from Uwe Boll like Blood Rayne. There was one movie that really felt like waste of time and that was Max Payne.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's relative to many factors. Direktor, budget, cast, enthusiasm, etc. Many people bash Uwe Boll, but they forget he had almost nothing to work with when it came to the video game movies he was associated with. On the other hand, watch his film Rampage and you will wonder if this is the same person who made the crap ass hat video game movies.
Comment has been collapsed.
Telltale's The Walking Dead was based on the comic, Activisions The Walking Dead was based on AMC series.
Comment has been collapsed.
Man Vs Wild was awful. Walking Dead Survival instinct was shitty (not to get confused with the other walking dead by telltale games which was good). Deadlist catch, 24, Prison Break: The Conspiracy, Grey's Anatomy: The Video Game.
There are some more I've never heard of or played that are just as bad. Defiance is bad from what I heard, I've never played it but have friends who have and said it sucked.
Comment has been collapsed.
How exactly was I supposed to know ST=star trek? Either way, how many is a few? And how many star trek games have there been. From what I looked up the majority of them have sucked and the few good ones are rated have low reviews unless rated by a star trek fan.
Irregardless my previous comment still stands, there are good games based of tv/movies, but the vast majority are terrible.
Comment has been collapsed.
Movies based on games have a better chance of success than games based on movies. A good movie needs only a good writer and a good director, which is why you can make a good movie about anything if you have both. A movie based on a video game is therefore highly dependent upon who they hire to do the film.
A good video game, on the other hand, has a lot more points at which it can fail: concept; execution; gameplay; mechanics; target audience; programming; financing; and possibly writing. Because of that, video game development requires a lot of time to ensure those aspects are "done right." Video games based on movies are unlikely to be given sufficient time and/or money for development, and are therefore much more likely to turn out badly.
Comment has been collapsed.
Chronicles of Riddle: Escape from Butcher Bay. An amazing game based on a movie. And there is some old Indiana Jones games, and I am sure some of them are good.
But in general, games based on movies are far more likely to be absolute rubbish. Most movies based on games in the past have tended to have good universes and plot to adapt from, and only fail because of absolute incompetence. While most games based on movies never had a chance to begin with, as the entire concept was just a greedy cash-grab with an absolutely horrible concept.
Comment has been collapsed.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis is a good game set in same universe. Retelling the movie is usually horrible idea. Going off the movie and aiming to setting works if games are allowed to live as their own medium.
Same goes the other way.
Comment has been collapsed.
There are a few good games based on movies, but I'm not sure there are any good movies based on games. They tend to be terrible either way, but at least there's the remote possibility of a Movie=>Game property being decent. Nothing survives the transition from Game=>Movie.
Comment has been collapsed.
Both have bad and less bad examples(and maybe some exceptions) but logically I would guess that game based movies would be worse then movie based games ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
If Uwe Boll sucks, then please explain why Hollywood keeps paying him millions of dollars to make movie after movie. And why shows like Firefly get cancelled and a movie is only made when 500,000 people riot.
Comment has been collapsed.
Hollywood isn't paying him. Most of his funding came from abusing German tax laws. He intentionally made movie after movie that wouldn't make a profit so that investors could get tax write offs.
Comment has been collapsed.
20 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by InSpec
71 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by Reidor
7 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by sensualshakti
1,775 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Shanti
28 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by DiabLXIX
52 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by BlazeHaze
24 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Fluffster
36 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by grez1
717 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by CelticBatman
434 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by Heitor112
1,578 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by Pyrocious
3,362 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by pizurk
103 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by eeev
1,865 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MeguminShiro
I'm not a big fan of this type of movies or games, but what do you think? Are the movies based on games worse or is it other way around?
Mass effect movie under primary development process BTW. I genuinely hope this doesn't get screwed up. :|
Comment has been collapsed.