21 Comments - Last post 52 minutes ago by Jirou
16,650 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by Channel28
217 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Mayanaise
240 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by FranckCastle
217 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by anditsung
2,358 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by MonoceroS
27 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Dadkill
145 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by DarkCobra
50 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by Xeradan
40 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by stlpaul
88 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by Rattacore
71 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by lav29
306 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by lav29
9 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by cynnix
Rule checking should be done automatically by the site if the admin cares. It's not my problem if someone breaks rules.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 1 month ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
This is exactly why I don't bother to check or report. 99% of the time when I checked, the answer from support was "already served".
None of that is any excuse for not doing it automatically.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 1 month ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't have anything against the present system really I don't mind doing a simple check before sending gifts, and I don't think suspensions should be given automatically but I've been wondering why it wasn't possible to at least have the system check that winners have redeemed their gifts when marking received and report to support if not. I understand that the Steam's API doesn't always reports games properly but it does works for a good numbers of games.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 6 years ago.
Comment has been collapsed.