326 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by thoughtfulhippo
100 Comments - Last post 48 minutes ago by RomchEk
267 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Gamy7
38 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Daviidv
47,224 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by MrPantera
917 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by star4you
161 Comments - Last post 21 hours ago by Georgeous
147 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by ashtwo
17,113 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by Warriot
28 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by Ashtart
38 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by magicmase
12 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by coleypollockfilet
393 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by violence03
85 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by hieeeen
Rule checking should be done automatically by the site if the admin cares. It's not my problem if someone breaks rules.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 1 week ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
This is exactly why I don't bother to check or report. 99% of the time when I checked, the answer from support was "already served".
None of that is any excuse for not doing it automatically.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 1 week ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't have anything against the present system really I don't mind doing a simple check before sending gifts, and I don't think suspensions should be given automatically but I've been wondering why it wasn't possible to at least have the system check that winners have redeemed their gifts when marking received and report to support if not. I understand that the Steam's API doesn't always reports games properly but it does works for a good numbers of games.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 5 years ago.
Comment has been collapsed.