who's winner
30 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by BarbaricGenie
16,536 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Fluffster
1,025 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MaxLevch
12 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by thoughtfulhippo
24 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Akylen
19 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by AdJ
59 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by K1R4D3L
43 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Deleted2137
15 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by Cluelesson
3 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by Mhol1071
166 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Aldcoran
41 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by ClapperMonkey
51 Comments - Last post 57 minutes ago by Axelflox
3,605 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by yugimax
Thanks for the giveaway! ✔
Comment has been collapsed.
Thx you for Giveways !
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks
Comment has been collapsed.
thanks for the chance!!!
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you!
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for the GA.
I want to advice that you set a minimum level for your future GAs because each one that gave one, not free, game is, at least, level 1.
Easy solution to hold the worst rulesbreakers, win resellers, autojoiner user and bots outside (40% of the level 0 accounts have infractions for unactivated or multiple wins + the ammount of used autojoiners are much more as in higher levels).
And besides that it lowers the cases of problems with your winners.
You can check accounts/your winners with:
http://www.sgtools.info/activation
http://www.sgtools.info/multiple-wins
If someone have red marks there request a reroll and put the link(s) into the support ticket.
https://www.steamgifts.com/stats/community/users
Scroll down to the bottom and look at the "per level" info and you see 970k are level 0, only around 165k have a level, 113k of them are level 1. So around 15% of the members from sg gave something and only 4% gave more as 5 games.
Have a nice day
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for the game and thanks for allowing 0 level accounts to participate, unlike that guy suggestion above >.>
Comment has been collapsed.