This is a monthly "activity for new users".
It is better for the community if new users are helped to prepare for things.
It is also more efficient than trying to reduce BOT swarms alone.
🤖🤖🤖🤖　🔫ヽ(Θ´; )ﾉ≡🕳≡ヽ( ;`Θ)ﾉ💻📡)))))　🌏

By the way, we have seen in the past that when a Winner is a cheater, rerolls are repeated 4 or 5 times and the cheater freezes and suffers.　I always check the winners as written.😊🔎🔥😭🔥🎣🐈

From time to time, we send a cohesive group of people to support tickets.

　The problem is that there is an upper limit to the number of support tickets per day, and sometimes the number of tickets is insufficient for the number of people detected, which occurs when we do a "full survey".

When I post "Please check this GA (URL)" to the discussion, I think that creating a group for simultaneous detection in the form of "Entrants of this GA from No1-100 for A to 101-201 for B..." would eradicate BOTs, but the quandary is that I have not done that much because it would drastically reduce my game time, which is still being cut down. 😁

One thing's for sure: "It's not something you do alone."

　Automation of everything seems to be in vogue on Earth.
We will report back with proof that "intelligent life has confirmed" within a reasonable amount of time. Currently, that is what we are looking at.

　I wouldn't be surprised if one of these days, the authors of SGTools will have an AI create a tool that can cross examine all members automatically and view information about violators.
　CG may just be waiting for the day when they can easily push the punishment button.
Someone might lament if the AI gets it wrong and hunts false accusers, but it would be a good trend to be able to make ban and suspend decisions only for users who are deemed to be in conflict.
(Of course, such a story shouldn't exist yet...)

I have seen recently many people on other social networking sites who are furious that when a moderator leaves for real-life reasons, he or she should have the authority to run the social networking project he or she created after leaving, but is not given that authority because of a temporary squabble with his or her boss, and is unable to contribute to the community.
(The problem there seems to have been resolved when the project's editorial authority was properly granted to that person.)
Things that depend solely on the contributions of a particular user often don't work for a long time.
(SG veterans need to teach new users how to do the same work).
This is one of the reasons I do an "open" gift once a month.
We recognize the problem, suggest possible responses, prevent the problem from spreading, and ultimately resolve the nuisance.
Long story short, if you ask if there has ever been a time in human history when there were no criminals, the answer is there.

Wait, inco- ooh, ads and donations.

The reason is "there are various"

🔎
Old post
Looking back, the callers at Public's GA started doing it a little while after they learned about the "reason".

Come to think of it, I have only made one Public giveaway each month since I learned the truth about things.🤔

Considering the time it takes to do the work when I know "reason " it is still easier to use SGTools, but it seems that some people misconfigure the tools or do not check the notifications about unauthorized intrusions when the GA period is over.

I wonder if it would be better to make an effort to shorten the description of those information as well, taking into account (and hoping for) the operational status of the SGtools side and the CG's implication, and see how it goes, but a long and lengthy description is generated.

Well, I have told you a long story.
These have been done for quite some time.🍨🐧🧊