none they both suck

Neither. The gain isn't worth it. You're betting off putting that money towards a new GPU or CPU. CPUs are more important for gaming than ever before.

neither

Neither. Just get one good GPU.

Single GPU, GTX680 in my case

Had many troubles with SLI( 8800GT)...Never had a CrossFire and i ll never will. SLI either. Never again.

oh forgot to say why more specifically. Well, for my SLI experience I had many troubles with many games and was a really pain in the ass for those 10-15 fps that i was gaining from that. nononononnonono

None of them.

If you have money to burn and a PSU that you can sacrifice for satan, then get a SLI

• They scale better and do better on most of the games vs AMD.
• AMD releases crossfire profiles poorly/late
• SLI setups are not spiky, while most of the games in crossfire are spikyyyyyyyyyyyyy its like AMD is being hit by a magnitude 9 earthquake from the graph

oh if someone is gonna reply here saying, "but but but amd crossfire has moaaaar FPS".

Bullshit, have fun with your higher fps if it feels spiky

none

It depends on the game and how it is programmed to run.

Will it or wont it take advantage of SLI/crossfire? which one did the developer favor? how the hell are consumers supposed to know before testing the final product/game?

Just buy a top of the line graphic card.

ATI has micro-stuttering issues that probably wont be fixed till next driver update.
Impartial towards brands so no bias