Plushies would be cool, though I'm not sure it would be really that sort of game (it's going to be in the adventure-puzzle-horror sphere of game).
The other issue is getting those produced. Do you know a company that produces that sort of thing by any chance?
Comment has been collapsed.
Not really :/ All I can think of is is Smoko Inc. but I'm not sure if they make customs for other people or companies.
Comment has been collapsed.
If only this happened to even half the successful kickstarters.
Comment has been collapsed.
Weekly update logs would do it for me, but that's only relevant after the campaign ended, where you optimally want your backers to trust you from the start. Your best shot there is to already have a few full game out, but even that sturdy doesn't guarantee anything..
Comment has been collapsed.
Already having a game published (or more than one) would be like Kickstarter easy mode though. I might not even need to go the Kickstarter route if that were the case.
Hopefully though I'll be able to present a reasonably captivating proof of concept, along with some bonuses based on the feedback here and elsewhere that will get people willing to back me to the point of my fairly modest goal. I'm probably going to be asking for somewhere between $20,000 and $30,000.
Comment has been collapsed.
All of the above. Betas, platform tests, special features for backers, yeah.
Comment has been collapsed.
A lot of people like to just pre-order the game using kickstarter, so if you want to tempt people to spend a little more, space your extras tiers close to the pre-order tier, for things like soundtrack, beta access, etc.
One thing I've seen done wrong quite a few times is assuming that everyone values beta access more than artbooks or soundtracks. It's not necessarily the case. For instance, I only really dig the soundtracks and unique skins, and on a rare occasion the artbooks. One way to get around this might be to make a basic pre-order tier, but then offer "Add-ons" for soundtracks, artbooks, beta and alpha access, unique skills/skins/characters/whatever, and then let the backers pick from what they want. That way you can get that little extra pledge money, and your backers can get what they want without being held back behind the cost/gain barrier. If you plan on doing cross-platform, another good add-on is "extra copy, for different platform". Be careful about making add-ons for extra copies though, because if you're not careful people will pledge $1 in base, just to get the add-on price, sometimes even undercutting your "Early Bird" tier.
Another huge mistake is setting the kickstarter pre-order price too high, and then by the time the game makes it onto something like steam's Early Access, the discount there can be better than what your backers in KS got. It's not so much a problem for people who love getting in on alphas and betas, but for people like me who prefer to abstain so we can experience the whole thing without getting burned out on the project we love? It ends up being a liiiiittle bit raw deal. At least, if you don't have much disposable income for entertainment.
Kickstarter unique content is a pretty good way to pull interest. It's always better if it doesn't create a pre-launch form of "pay-to-win", but rather gives your early backers a little extra customisation. These such rewards need to be exclusive though, otherwise people start to feel cheated. You can avoid that by clearly stating that the extra content will be available as DLC later/at launch, and by offering it at a solid discount for backers. For instance, Contagion gave backers some cool ringtones for use in-game (for a sort of close-range marco-pollo mechanic using bluetooth). The trouble here is that non-backers had to navigate around these locked-out selections to pick their own, and it felt a bit weird. If you can find a sweet-spot for unique and interesting content and what level of exclusivity it has, you'll do well! One campaign assured us that certain crowdfunding extras will be totally exclusive and not released as DLC (though they did plan for other DLC later), and as a result I was far more tempted to up my pledge. I wouldn't mind so much but I was taking a risk to begin with because it's not the genre of game I usually enjoy, and they totally manage to get me in on it. (It was Armello, and the four exclusive bandit heroes)
I can't really comment much on higher tiers of things like figurines or letting backers into the design process for an item/NPC of their own, but "Early Bird" tiers tend to do well. Some kickstarters even had success making tiers lower than the pre-order, for just the soundtrack. Some people aren't big gamers, but can appreciate the musical talent (assuming you already have someone working on that so you have samples for the pitch video/page).
I would suggest googling around to find out about successful kickstarters as well as failed/scam-like ones. You can then go visit their original pages and check out their front-page layout, their pitch video quality, and what kinds of things they put into their updates. Even if you're genuine, some people may have concerns, because gamers do get burned fairly often by crowdfunding/early access and broken promises. You may even decide it's better to hold off on the crowdfunding until later on when you have more content to show. Example content is a big deal in getting people's attention. Anybody can sell you an idea, but it means a lot more when you can prove you have the focus to turn your idea into something tangible and with the correct feel and quality.
Comment has been collapsed.
soundtrack (.mp3 and other formats), digital+physical copies, modding support (Built in feature for ALL people, not something like "n tier gets modding tools". Actually seen that on one game. Mulyplayer maps,devkit maybe?
Comment has been collapsed.
I find artbooks interesting too, for guides just normal wikis, just because guides will be outdated after some time, but artbooks always in printed format, because imo digital just not feels the same, some developers give you digital artbooks/guides in PDF format and you just open it once, and never again, and I find this way completely useless. You can also even find all the mentioned artworks around the internet in same PDF format, if making artbooks, physical format is the way to go.
Comment has been collapsed.
E-book at least, though some put a physical one a few tiers above digital
Comment has been collapsed.
Exclusive in-game vanity items, like what Sapience is offering for Extra Life.
Comment has been collapsed.
I remember a company who made a puzzle game that I was interested in. I was about to take the first tier with steam key, which can be thought of as a pre-order. Then I realized that there were bonus levels made for kickstarters, but only for people who took a tier 50% more expensive than the retail price of the finished game. In my case, this bonus worked as the opposite: I don't like the idea of backing a game and not having all the gaming content (I'm speaking of playing time / levels, not of skins or other cosmectic item, nor art, or music, or everything else). So I didn't back the game (I finally bought it in a bundle for less than half the retail price, and only 1 or 2 months after it was available, but that's another story !).
So my advice would be that: do not include playable content that is tied to a specific tier. Of course, adding some playable content to all tiers, as an exclusive backers bonus, can be really good (not going into details, since Uroboros already did it very well).
Comment has been collapsed.
Promise to get all games from this developer for next 10 years for free (i saw this bonus in Pathologic kickstarter). But this works only if you already have pretty strong reputation.
Comment has been collapsed.
What I ALWAYS like when browsing RPG games on Kickstarter is the bonus of adding the backers at a certain tier into the game as NPCs and put on your own scripts or quests.
But of course, I had never backed at such amount.
Other than that, a t-shirt or any clothing/accessories is good enough.
Comment has been collapsed.
I have been thinking about making a separate post about that specific bonus idea actually (including backers as NPCs).
It seems like many games include them as fairly inconsequential characters, while occasionally a game will make those characters important to the plot. I wonder how people feel about either of those situations?
Comment has been collapsed.
I have seen a game that did both situtions for different tiers.
To be fair, I think having paid quite a certain amount and see yourself in-game with important things to deliver to the players is much better than seeing yourself mumbling stuff. (basically what most unessential NPCs do) Unless it's a brilliant line or joke.
Also, some devs give a chance for the backers to be companions to the players. THAT is way better imo.
Comment has been collapsed.
There are 2 things i wish to see when i donate in Kickstarter:
1) I would be really pleased if the developer was sending me a newsletter once a week while the game would be in alpha and beta and once a month when the game will be released.
2) I would like the developer to actually and honestly remembers me. This can be done by sending a "How are you?" no-reply email every 3 or 6 months or by sending me an email the day of my birthday for at least a couple of years.
I donated 2 times on Kickstarter, both times i gave 5$ on 2 separate games. The only thing i received from the dumb "developers" (i don't wish to say a worse adj about 'em) were a few badly made newsletters about the beta release and the final release. No beta access, not even an appropriate "Thank you so much!" reply. The result? I did not buy any of their games and i am not intended to do so!
So my main advice: Respect the people who will support you and do not forget them
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for the ideas.
I definitely had intended to do a blog and/or vlog to keep people updated, but a newsletter is a good idea too and does seem a bit more personal and backer-specific.
As for remembering backers on their birthdays or otherwise sending "how are you?" type emails.... I don't know. Some people probably would prefer NOT to receive that sort of thing. Although I guess the best thing for a developer to do might be to have an opt-in or opt-out option. I will have to think more about that.
I had also been thinking about having as a basic reward a personalized post card sent to each backer (once the Kickstarter ends). I think I saw one other campaign that did something similar and I thought it was pretty cool.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, personal emails would be too far IMO. The frequency of updates also depends on exactly how much you have to say, too. Getting emails every few days with nothing in them can frustrate some people, whereas going too long without any updates makes people paranoid. One update a month is a fair time-limit for each update, and once a week would be frequent but not spammy. It's also pretty common to make more updates early on after a campaign, or during certain points in development where interesting things are happening. It's usually best to go with the flow and find what works for you as much as for everyone else.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, I can see how certain periods of development would definitely have more interesting or meaty updates than others.
I suppose the most important thing is to sort of "warn" backers when a shift in the frequency of updates might occur in the near future, and explain why and what the new timetable will be.
Comment has been collapsed.
For me, I'm very unlikely to pay more than the minimum. I'm in fact very unlikely to back a kickstarter project to begin with, unless it's so cheap that I feel that I'm willing to risk my money on a project that may or may not be released. How cheap depends on the track record of the developers, if it's someone who I've seen do well in the past, I'm willing to pay more than if it's someone who I know nothing about. Paper Sorcerer is an excellent example of an "unknown" offering a game that looked interesting enough, at a low enough price, for me to be willing to part with some money (and I don't regret doing so, Paper Sorcerer might not have been perfect, but it was fun and it was interesting) .
So for me, unless your higher tier offer is something absolutely amazing, I won't part with any extra money. And that "absolutely amazing" is unlikely to be a realistic bonus.
Actually, before submitting, I just came up with one thing. Soundtrack. If you give a soundtrack sample, and it sounds like something that I could use (likely as background music for my pen & paper RPG sessions), I might part with up to €2.5 extra. But not more.
Comment has been collapsed.
I can understand that, and I think most people are unlikely to back at anything above the first or second tier for most projects.
To be honest, the reason I'm thinking about what to put in the bonus tiers has more to do with what I guess are the public's expectations of a Kickstarter campaign, than my own wish to entice people to back the project for more money. I want to impress people with my professionalism (as well as my ideas), so as to overcome some of the skepticism about backing a new developer.
Comment has been collapsed.
Art books in pdf format, instruction booklet/guide also in pdf, sound track, reduced price from final release for being a backer, beta access, and alternate player skins that don't alter gameplay but are exclusive to backers are my favorite rewards.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm not particularly fond of the Kickstarter concept in general and I really think money shouldn't be wasted on this kind of things.
Focus on the game, make it good, ship it. That's my 2 cents.
Comment has been collapsed.
I can understand not wanting to take a risk, especially when there are many games to enjoy already available.
However, Kickstarter (or similar) is an important avenue for bringing new game developers, unusual projects, and/or niche projects into production.
There's little chance to focus on the game, make it good, and ship it if one is spending most of their time doing other work.
Comment has been collapsed.
In my opinion, buying Early Access games is taking a risk. Kickstarter (and similar) is somewhere between a very early, blind pre-order and a donation to a business operation. Now, I'm certainly against pre-orders and I believe donations should go to charities, not for-profit businesses.
On the other hand, I understand that funds are needed; I dislike the funding publisher/producer model and I understand some great things just wouldn't happen without Kickstarter and similar. Unfortunately I have to come to the conclusion that there no system that both works and matches my tastes.
So good luck with your effort, whatever it is! :)
Comment has been collapsed.
I back games on Kickstarter more than I buy them on Steam. And I tend to pledge more money in the average (and even the median) Kickstarter pledge than in the average purchase either on Steam or any of the bundle sites.
However, very few games get me to shell out more than the bare minimum needed to get the game, once it is done.
One part of it is the fact I'm not a rich man. Not by a long shot.
The other part is that I'm not very much interested in the frills, at least not up front. Not in the majority of cases.
For Project Eternity - now Pillars of Eternity - I shelled out $35. It was the first time I pledged, and was too late for the early bird tier anyway. An extra $10 for the soundtrack and monster manual seemed like a good deal. Later on I added another $20 for the expansion; that option was introduced a bit later and seemed like a good idea as well.
Torment: Tides of Numenéra I backed early enough to be in the early bird tier; IIRC I was among the first thousand backers. However, that was Torment. I pledged $80, partially because I'd missed the Wasteland 2 campaign, but mainly because it's freakin' Torment. I'd have given more if I could, and I've given a bit more in the past days (and I also got a few friends to pledge at least $20).
All in all, while additional content generally goes down well, don't focus on that. Focus on the game you wish to make; sell the concept, and people will give you money to see it happen. (Also, deliver. That should go without saying, but you also have to sell the notion that you can deliver.)
Whatever you do, however, be very careful about adding special in-game items for high pledge levels. It's generally considered a dick move and people often shy away from pledging altogether.
Also, some people like physical rewards. I don't know how feasible that is for you and your game concept, but some people like merchandise and can afford it. Depending on your target, that may be a viable option to explore - but only if your goal is high enough.
Comment has been collapsed.
1,535 Comments - Last post 39 minutes ago by sonatamyasa
176 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by NB264
242 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by osztihun
469 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by manueluis
47,173 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by FranckCastle
94 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by FranckCastle
26 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by dohlicious
223 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by ThePonz
165 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by Ev4Gr33n
6 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Eefrit
106 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by Lifedreamer
57 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by webdak
9 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by fernandopa
39 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by MyrXIII
The title is pretty straightforward. I am doing some "market research", you might say, for my own upcoming game.
I am curious what kind of bonus offerings entice you (or your friends) to back Kickstarter projects at higher tiers than the base tier.
Please feel free to offer other tips / suggestions / feedback related to this question.
Comment has been collapsed.