IMO, sometimes it's too high. Other times, when it's large but still reasonable for quite a few, I'm down with that. Like, giveaways with a contributor value of like, $600 or something, that's too big. In my opinion, the max contributor value needed to enter a giveaway, but still reasonable, would be $200, MAYBE $225.

11 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

I see no valid reason for that, let everyone choose the value they want on their contributor giveaways. I am cool with it.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, people can, and should do what they want with them.

It does seem odd to me sometimes, seeing a bundle or super cheap game with a contributor value over 200, but if they're getting entries, whatever.

I think they're a great way to give back to those who can afford it, but it is charity that those capable of handing out hundreds of dollars of games away don't really need. A somewhat odd contradiction that seems to reward people gaming the system more often than not, but if 1 contributor walked away with a game they wanted but hadn't picked up because of it - awesome.

The community should NEVER dictate HOW a person is being charitable. We should be grateful either way.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You have a point there, it's true that those who give more will more likely have less need for the games and vice versa.

On the other hand I do not really know if the purpose of the site is to make charity work, or simply sharing. As for example I myself could most likely have bought all the games I've won with my own money, but there's always that plus when you win something, I don't know, like a better feeling.

And as you well say, the contributor, their rules (as far as they are within the site ones, sure) the community should never judge anyone on their requirements (Within the rules).

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I was gonna type out a long reply and you jsut said everything I thought. So thanks for saving me time lol, and valid points lol

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Let them choose, when you create a giveaway choose $200 or $225.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

They choose what they want and everything works out fine.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There's not really a reason why the giveaway's creator shouldn't be allowed to set the contributor requirement as high as they want. Sometimes they do it thank those people who have been especially generous. Instead of complaining you should contribute more if you want to enter those giveaways. I think it's a good thing this system encourages people to contribute by allowing high contributor requirements for giveaways.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm not complaining, I'm just putting my voice out there. The thing is, I don't enter ANY giveaways, I just make giveaways.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I understand. I was concerned you might be one of those leechers who want all contributor requirements removed because THEY don't want to gift any games. I think the system is good as it is, there are people who have gifted games worth thousands of dollars, so it's only fair they can make giveaways for people who have contributed as much.

If that value would be restricted to, let's say $200, many people would probably stop gifting games as soon as they hit that mark. The current system encourages people to gift constantly more, every boost to your contributor value counts.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

While you're right, I also see no real point of making $1000+ giveaways. To give that much you have to get "some money", which means you can buy games for yourself anyway.

But, on the other hand, Santa always gives better presents to richer kids...

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Great. It provides a reward for the people who really keep the site running with piles of games, and offers incentive to others.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

People who make $2,000+ giveaways could just do them private. They know who's entering. They just want to flaunt it. And don't get me wrong, it's awesome that they've amassed that value, but still. Makes me feel like a chump.

As far as contributor value for an average giveaway, I'd say whatever is just below my contrib value at any given time is best. :P

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"They know who's entering"
ehhh.....no they don't -__-

"They just want to flaunt it."
ehhh.....no they don't -__-

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just lighthearted jabs. :)

I sure notice and recognize people with high contributor value. And as for "flaunting", I'm just jealous. :P

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think if someone purchases a game with their own money, they can give it away however the fuck they want. If you don't think it's reasonable, then it's because you're not the target audience.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Agreed.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think people can choose whatever amount they want considering it's their game to give away.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1000

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah you're right, but we're not discussing about this. It isn't what people should or must do, but what we think is cool.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because people with small contrib mostly are exploiters, stupid, annoying, unrespectful, or ungrateful and giveaway creators don't want to deal with all that.

I'd say, go for +300 contrib always, and rise it by a hundred every year.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That would alienate new-ish users who at least try. I try but with +300, I couldn't enter anything. Fun >:

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Or they could be new users who just haven't been able to get enough to contribute? Mine is only $15, I've been a member for only a bit over a week now.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think it's sometimes stupid because those people probably just want to show how much they contributed, when they spent $2000 on games to give aways they probably don't win games to get them.

But it's ok because a) they are rare and b) people can decide who they want to get their games.

For lower requirements ($100 - $1000) I think what other said, people that gave that much probably will be more grateful.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I agree with you, I do think it's fair people can sort of "crowd control" who can enter a giveaway. Since they're rare anyway, I can't argue about that much about them. $100-$1000 giveaways are fine in my book, it's just that my OP might've been a little misleading. I'm saying that when it reaches insane contributor value heights, like way beyond $1000, that's when it can get a little crazy.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Where the hell did you get 225 x____x

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

(213+44365/213-41123 12% + 213 - 42)^0 + 224

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

= 15²

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't care and move on.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I really do like those $2000+ giveaways :-P

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think all giveaways should be capped at $745.37. lol ;p

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's a nice incentive to help people give games. If you are able to enter giveaway that less can join, and that being solely because you have given away more, is fine. There would be a crazy amount of leechers if all the giveaways were open and no option for a contributor value.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Fair enough, but don't you think it's even just a little bit insane when people put giveaways in which you need to have contributed like, $2000? I'm not saying it's wrong to do to that, but IMO I do think the people who do that should tone it down just a tiny bit.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Maybe if all their giveaways are $2,000 then they're a bit of a gloater, but many of the giveaways that have a high contributor value also have the people hosting giveaways with lower values, or none at all. :)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Opinion varies but I'm not too bothered either way. So long as there isn't a sudden rush for everyone to start making all their giveaways at the max capped value, then we're all included in something so everyone still gets something in the end (Eventually).
I do appreciate seeing values scaled to the expense or rarity of the giveaway though. I might cringe at someone requiring $600 for a game that only costs $3, but the same value on say a collection costing $70? Then it makes more sense to me. Earn your way to expense, logic and reasoning and all that.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Its their game, they should be able to give it away anyway they want to. What right do you have to tell people what to do with something they own?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm not telling them to give away games at a low contributor value needed, I'm just voicing my opinion that some giveaways that require a VERY, VERY high contrib value is not my cup of tea. Anyways, before you think I'm a leecher for saying that, I don't, and will not ever, enter giveaways.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You shouldn't see it as something elitist. At first I thought it just like you, but then I thought that people who spent lot of money also deserved their cut. Well you can also think that the richest ones should contribute to the unluckiest, but well it'a 50%-50% choice :)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't really care about high contributor value giveaways (although I think they are insanely high), but I think there should be an obligatory minimum contributor value to enter giveaways which should be equated to the value of the game.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think $50 is perfect. For users who've invested and contributed but not spend their whole pocket money on one homepage XD.

Weee!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Even $100 is not enough to keep the bad people away these days.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I've seen users with over $50 contributor value solely from keys they got for free.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i think the people who enter the giveaways with 500+ contributor needed are the ones who really deserve to win

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think it would be better if everyone contribute a little than a few carrying the heavy burden :D

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Today i was exited because i saw a Dishonored giveaway. But then i saw i needed a contributor value of 1500. That made me a sad panda.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't mind.

I actually like a smaller audience - say, 50 people instead of 2000. This is why I do mostly contributor giveaways and group/private ones.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

that is the only real way to answer to this thread <3

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Rarely I see something over $200. Oh, registered two weeks ago and already have problems with like what? 3% giveaways he can't enter due to the contribution? Oh my...

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't enter giveaways, I just make them. I'm not a leecher.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 years ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I never said that. I just assumed (when I shouldn't have) that the person I replied to assumed I was a leecher and just wanted to enter tons of giveaways, so I needed to defend myself.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

They can make the contribution value how fucking high they want!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 11 years ago by Dreamare.