Technically, you promised to deliver the full game in the giveaway, and you so far gave only a part of it. The question of wether the winner owned other parts is irrelevant, since you allowed them to enter.
Technically, you can put up another giveaway since the winner has the promised product on account. But in a real-world scenario, you would need to give the key to the base game so the new owner can decide what to do with it. most just give it to someone on their friend list.
Comment has been collapsed.
You wrote in giveaway this "If you are entering just for DLC, tell me which keys you won't need. Then I'll have to check on the legality of giving the "extras" away again, though I'm sure someone will inform me." So I think you can keep the base game key and create another giveaway for it.
Comment has been collapsed.
if you make a ga for a complete package, you need to deliver everything in it.
since you allowed people to enter only for the dlc, it sounds like you are trying to get more cv out of a giveaway by keeping the base game for later.
unless the winner tells you he doesn't want the base key and you are free to keep it, you should give the winner everything in a pack.
Comment has been collapsed.
The CV of a bundled game really isn't all that big of a deal. I'm more concerned with getting the keys out to people who will use and enjoy them.
If the answer is that I can't make a giveaway for it, but I can give it away elsewhere, that's fine. If the answer is I give it to the winner even though he can only regift it, that's fine.
Comment has been collapsed.
i can't speak for support so i'm not sure if it's against the rules, but if the winner says you can keep the base game key, then it will be ok to make another giveaway.
the only thing i'm sure is against the rules is to give less than what was announced in a giveaway, so if you made a ga for a pack, you must deliver all the required keys.
just as an example, there are games that once activated give you another copy in your inventory (frozen synapse). the winner isn't obligued to return the second copy to the ga creator, and he can do whatever he wants with it.
Comment has been collapsed.
If that's what support rules, I'll abide by it (and thus this is why I asked before I did anything with it and in fact can still just give the base game key to the winner.) so it should be obvious I'm not attempting to scam anyone or break the rules.
The thing though is if that's the ruling, that leaves the key in the hands of the winner who legally (by the rules of the site) can't do anything with it. And that's more than a little silly.
I'd even be fine if I had to give the key to him and he was free to make a giveaway for it.
Comment has been collapsed.
You should have asked such question before that giveaway. When you allow people to enter only for DLC and you give away separate keys and no "complete pack", you should have seen this coming.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's not a matter of not having seen anything coming. I knew I'd have to ask what to do in this instance when I created the giveaway.
And I did give away everything in the pack. If it was all one game, it would result in Steam eating the base game. Since it is a separate key, I'm trying to figure out what restrictions there are on what can be done with it.
Comment has been collapsed.
You're good. In my opinion you acted according to SG rules and are free to do with the extra keys as you please.
Comment has been collapsed.
We are sure about our personal viewpoints... we just don't agree :D
Comment has been collapsed.
it basically goes like mully said.
"if you make a ga for a complete package, you need to deliver everything in it."
Comment has been collapsed.
If the winner insists on the key, they're engaging in win/CV exploitation. If you repost the key, you're engaging in CV exploitation twice over, once for inflated initial value and once for the bonus giveaway.
Attempt to arrange an accord with the winner- so long as the winner has all the necessary APPIDs, and neither of you are engaged in obvious exploitation, staff is highly unlikely to care what the end result is. Alternatively, give the remaining key away for free to a third party, in a manner that makes the transition of ownership readily apparent. Then, all keys will have been delivered, and neither winner or creator will have engaged in exploitation- that's the cleanest solution.
If you and the winner are in dispute, then you'd have to make a ticket regardless- so you should certainly do that, if you can't manage to reach an arrangement with the winner.
Comment has been collapsed.
531 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
1,760 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
3 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Chris76de
1,014 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by sensualshakti
155 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by MeguminShiro
20 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by entomberr
66 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by WastedYears
48 Comments - Last post 5 seconds ago by fernandopa
28,228 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Chris76de
16,772 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by MjrPITA
1 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by AmikoNovich
7,965 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by Noxco
4 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by Calibr3
783 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by z00rox
So, I have a situation now that the FAQ doesn't seem to cover.
In the recent Civilization Humble Bundle, there were 4 keys for Civilization V: The base game, 1 each for the 2 expansions, and 1 for all remaining DLC. So I gave this away as Civilization V Complete. Knowing it would be asked, I decided to allow people to enter for the DLC alone.
The winner had the base game already, so I sent him the 2 expansion keys and the DLC key. I presumed he couldn't use the base game key itself because he couldn't use it on his own account and giving it to someone else would be regifting.
So now what do I do with the base game key? Can I make another giveaway for it? Should I give it away elsewhere? Was I wrong and should I send it to the winner to do with what he wants?
'Tis a conundrum...
Comment has been collapsed.