Why? I enjoyed the Campaing pretty much and the Multiplayer was better than BO1 and MW3

12 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

bandwagon bumheads

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

cuz they can't buy it, sad truth, isn't it?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

exactly, some people think it's cool to say call of duty sucks.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I had it pre-ordered on steam. Day 1, on campaign, I ran into 3 game-breaking bugs in a matter of minutes. I raged pretty hard because there is no excuse to not thoroughly test a big budget title like that. It was also ridiculously annoying that I felt like I was more or less watching a fucking movie rather than playing a game. I couldn't help but compare the game to Halo 2, by which this game couldn't compare. Finally, I gave up campaign.

I knew that the selling point of the series was multiplayer anyway, and it didn't let me down. The game's multiplayer is great. Nothing ground-breaking here... but a huge community and fun maps for the most part. My only REAL complaint is that all the little kiddies rather play Team Deathmatch over CTF which is sad. Heaven forbid you have to use strategy over just sticking to small spaces with an automatic shotgun.

TL;DR - Halo 2 was better.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

what lies are these i played cod bo2 at pc not only these all cod games day one and there was no bug

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

it's because CoD makes the same game OVER AND OVER, with the same basics for a storyline, better graphics, and same exact gameplay. It's REALLY boring and gets them millions.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because it's the 'cool' thing to do?

I don't hate on it as a game. Just not a big fan of the CoD series but I don't try and enforce my opinion onto others, which is what some people do.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

huge waste of money, you can buy 60 copies of fortix with that much money

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

24 copies of Company of Heroes for 75% off on steam... that'd be a better use for 60 dollars =D

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

or 2 copies of Skyrim when its -50% sales.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

or 60 copies of Rome Total War Gold on 90% sale , that's the best use for 60 dollars

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

ok huge waste of money in this way are all games even fortix

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Following everyone else even though they haven't tried the game.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Same could be said of every single cod/bf/fifa game released, the same crap with the same gameplay with rehashed maps and massive amounts of rehashed content as DLC. Most of cod players just buy it because others do

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you have no idea what you are saying, even though most of it is true you didn't read the post you responded to making you a over zealous fool. As for COD 2 you'd be wrong there's allot of 'crap' that would fill a barn. It's has more then most games out there right now and people like you have their head so far up their ass that they judge a book before it's cover.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Like if cod players wasn't zealous fools anyway :P It has more than other games? Sorry? Multiplayer? It's always the same, just with different backgrounds/skins, the gameplay might be different until all the crybabies moan about the new mechanics that they don't want to learn because they are so used to previous titles it hurts them. They prefer blaming the game than their skill or willingness to learn new ways of dealing with new things. Take for example gears of war 3, it was amazing at the start when you could choose whatever weapon you want because they had their pro/cons, until gow2 players started crying on sawedoff players. They were so used to shotgun/walldancing that they couldn't deal with new weapons. In the end the game become gow2.0, every single weapon but shotguns became crap, and again, the same game over and over

And anyway I hate FPS multiplayer oriented games since the golden era of counterstrike. Why? because I used to play on a cibercafé and I HATED all those kids bitching and bullying each other because they didn't know how to loose. I don't know if pc online gaming is any kind of different, but cod/bf games on consoles are fully crowded with retards that shield themselves with anonimacy and love to insult others like if it was something normal.

And I don't want to start talking on DLC's, because it's retarded seeing the massive amount of rehashed maps/skins they like to release. And I still find weird they are giving cod2 elite for free, seeing how many people paid before. I think they could even charge 70eur instead of 60 for the game, anyway everyone would still buy it

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because all or most of them are either Straight up RTS fanboys and girls or BF3 Fanboys boys and girls

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

wut about rpg fan boys like me? huh?!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Actually, from what I've seen, many of them are Counter-Strike fanboys, not BF3. I saw only single posts about BF3 being better (I think same).

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"Stop liking what I don't like!"

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

^ this

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

when ppl ask on a forum for opinions ill give it. i dont hate call of duty but i think they are flooding the market and overcharging their loyal customers for a few small upgrades on the same game they've been selling for the past 3 or whatever years

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

^^ this

I don't hate CoD either, I just take exception to the above and the (lame) business practices and also the mentality of many of the people in the CoD community

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

People are accusing others of being kiddy CoD fanboys etc., just because they think sth different. That's really retarded hate. Ofc they called me like that too and I played only 2 single player campaigns + zombie mode (CoD1, WaW, MW2) and they are far away from being my favorites :)

You know that situation, when you play MP game and some kids start screaming that you are hacker, because you kick their asses? It's similar x)

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

its like seeing some1 playing cs, calling him a cod hater and then posting shit like this.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What? You don't understand, what you read. I never told that CS fanboy = CoD hater, I said that many of CoD haters are CS fans, because I actually checked their Steam profiles and saw dozens or even hundreds hours of playtime. (some guys had even thousands, sic!). I can't do this with BF3, so can't say same.

Btw. I thought they were teaching this in elementary school: "every square is rectangle, but not every rectangle is square" ;)

EDIT: oh I forgot - CS:GO is on my wishlist for some time already, so, tell me again, what did you say... x)
EDIT2: what an irony. You are CoD hater, which you proved many times, and you got over 300 hours in CS, heh

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"it's like", read again this sequence "it's like" and then make a proper post. read my post again, slowly and show me where did i use word "you" or "wojtek" or w/e that is related to you. i thought u passed reading exams but now i can asume u still doing them, sadly. now read your posts and make a conclusion, cuz as far as i can see from here, u are not different than these haters/fanboys below.
edit: OMG HOW DED U KNOUW DAT IM A COD HATER?!
edit2: now read through this and look how idiotic u sound.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

First of all, calm down. Your sentence is pretty clear and directly refers to my post. If not, show me which ones did you mean.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i supposed to show u? srsly? haha XD are u rly an idiot or u play one? XD

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Then you better hate EA and 2K sports for the yearly roster updates as well.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i dont buy sports games either but if i had to choose id but sports over cod due to the fact that im not having to pay for some dlc every few months

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

and how you pay for skins or items at different f2p games?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because every cod same year to year .
Piece of shit.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How about FIFA? Pro Evolution Soccer, NHL, NBA, Worms, Train Simulators, Counter-Strike, Mortal Kombat, etc. etc.

Some of them don't come out every year, but they have so few changes, then even CoD looks like brand new game.

How anybody can say, that CoD series got less changes than FIFA etc. sports game? I don't see hating them so much as CoD, we can just check Metacritic:
http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/fifa-soccer-12
http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/call-of-duty-black-ops-ii

Also, check this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_video_games

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nah , you speak about sports. You can't be bored out of any.COD is the game when you play some weeks or less and you will say "its enough from it"!
I can offer you many fps game which not that unrealistic like cod.(Battlefield 3 for example, and i dont have the game)

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

CSS came out 2004... thats like 8 years, so that isn't nearly every year, and they may not have changed that much, but atleast they don't charge 60€ (it's only 15€)

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Train Simulator 2013 was given to everyone who owned 2012 for free. I guess this would never happen with COD. CS:S came out long time ago. Sports games are getting newer engines every couple of years. Worms are getting a lot of new things (just look at Revolution) And all those said games don't cost 60€.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

People who own Train Simulator 2012 got free upgrade to 2013, and the same will happen with the 2014 version.

And about Counter-Strike... 3 games in 12 years does not seem that much really, and they actually have major differences between themselves.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

CS is same every year? They make a game every 5-10 years and CS:GO is EPIC.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How about Megaman or Metal Slug ?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

cod same in what play all cod in order from cod 1 until cod bo2 and you will see the changes expept you have crappy pc and you have textures at low which makes all cod games same

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

its the same engine since 2005! that speaks for itself.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't go around spreading my disdain, but I'm not a fan of modern or near-future shooters. Only issue I have with Blops 2 is the fans, not the game itself. Many fans hail it as the best game ever, due to not playing anything else, or for other reasons. CoD in general is fun, don't get me wrong, but I wouldn't put it up there with any of the classics in terms of quality. Also, many aren't a fan of Activision (I'm not, they just have some practices that are blatant cash grabs, but so do most major publishers). Hope that sheds some light.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

this guy is reasonable try and learn from this guy

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

because people keep making these threads to ask

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because they dont have anything to do and they insult CoD games to kill time. I personally like CoD games (MW3, black ops), havent tried BO2 yet.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

the series is good at what it does, shooting stuff
people just complain the it doesn't change much from one to the other but i don't think mario changes much either and no one complains about that
then again, mario doesn't have a $60 price tag

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Actually, Mario typically adds new power-ups, enemies, bosses, and/or significant changes in levels. Yes, the core gameplay stays the same, jumping on enemies and over hazards, but the number of changes in variables is greater than the Modern Warfare series. Black Ops looks like it actually changes a good bit, so good for it, core gameplay is the same but you have a new setting, new gear, etc. Fantastic, though a decent chunk of gamers don't want to play another modern shooter.

A side note: Super Mario Galaxy, Galaxy 2, New Super Mario Bros, and a bunch of others launched at $60. Don't know what Mario you've been playing.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i don't play mario. :P
only a little bit of the old ones.
and a rpg one, that one was fun.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because they are bad games for 60$

I bought XCOM for that money, 70 hours of play.

Dishonored, 45 hours of play

AC3 52 hours of play

Borderlands 2 40 hours of play

any cod game? 5 hours of play.

aside from that; any gripping story? no. care for characters? no. any mission where you actually think? no. only the music is good, which is because composers are something else entirely.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Most player profiles that I look at who play any CoD have HUNDREDS of hours logged. I'd say they're getting their money's worth.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

And I have 1000's of hours logged on CSS?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't understand how anyone can spend thousands of hours playing any game. If I spend over one hundred hours on a game, I've gotten my money's worth for sure.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

im probably gonna reach 1000+ hours in dota 2

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

try skyrim, u only need to do it for once then u end up losing 300hours on it.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I've had Skyrim for a while now. I absolutely love it, but I still haven't even reached 100 hours thanks to bugs and crashes.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

havent crashed or had game breaking bug in skyrim yet.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you dont even have skyrim.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

or he doesn't have it on steam.
but isn't skyrim a steamworks game and can't all steamworks games be redeem on steam?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

...

UNLESS ITS ON CONSOLE.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Then what the fuck is the point in his original comment? Obviously I'm talking about Skyrim on PC and therefore PC related issues.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

And for 4 months I was the same, no issues whatsoever. Then all of a sudden it starts crashing in various ways (a very common issue believe it or not).

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

cod sp yes it is 5 hours but with multiplayer every year is at least 200 hours.Ah and look if you want my playing time at bo and mw3 sp

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because all what CoD developers do is adding new sounds, textures, write a poor story and wrap it up into a 60€ package. Every year. MW1, WaW, BO and BO2 use the same engine, so basically each new release could be a DLC, but no, why make cheap dlc's if we can make a "full" game and milk naive players every year again and again. Last CoD i liked was 2 btw.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

WaW was pretty fun. The campaign was great, the most realistic in the series in terms of depicting war. The multiplayer was fun, though some things bothered me, like the PPsH being more powerful than the StG-44.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

it seems you are ww2 fun.Ok i will not critize this but like i said at a topic of mine engine is not the mater gameplay and fun is that count for example play cod split srceen with 4 friends it is much better.Oh and something else if the engine is the same then we must sell all the unreal 3 engine games cheap they use the same engine why not?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

cuz COD!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

because people cant seem to accept different opinions from their own

i wont buy blops 2, but i dont go around saying its terrible just cause i dont like it

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

the new cod is just like the other games. In fact some cod fans comment it's worse.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In fact, some CoD payers claim it's better. So now what?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i still think Cod:uo trumps all cods (personally) but then again, i guess im a nostalgia fag

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't hate COD, they're pretty fun, but why does Activition keep releasing a COD annually? It's the same fucking game with a few updates and a new campaign...

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Cos people will continue to buy them every year. Call of Duty is like the Madden, NCAA or FIFA franchises, a yearly update that only really changes the roster, makes the graphics a little prettier and adds a few new features nobody asked for.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't quite understand FPS game, most of the time they give me headaches which is the reason why I don't play them. CoD is okay... I haven't played any of the series ever in my life, but from what I hear it's too generic. Meaning, too much of the series are the same over and over, slight changes are made to gameplay and whatnot.

Whether or not they use a new Visual Engine doesn't seem to matter either, the franchise is so big that they'll make millions from doing the same thing over and over. Not that I know since I don't even play FPS games :p

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

At least it's not another war game like the ones released in the past 3 years. Personally I got bored with these kind of FPS, but I don't think it's bad.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because they dont have the 60€ for buy it XD kidding. Because CODs are the same sup every year.. For the lovers it is good,for the others, not.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think they already started to create BO3 because they did the same with BO2, they started making it before they released BO.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCB44L1O8bQ

^ became games like this one aren't made anymore, instead games are made with your casual console gamer in mind.

another funny thing to note is that this game with extreme mods like this one make it look significantly better than black ops 2

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 years ago.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

extremely late reply but i just noticed yours, so i'll reply now.

I'm not trying to use better graphics as an argument at all actually, I said games aren't made like this anymore after I linked a Quake video, obviously referring to the style of game play reminiscent of old-school shooters such as Quake, DOOM, Half-Life 1, etc. I just threw in that it's funny that a modded Quake (pushing 17 years old) looks significantly better than Black ops 2.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I personnaly don't blame the game, i blame the company for 2 things:
-Release of the exact same product every year without kindness for the player and any interest of making games. For them gaming is only a story of marketing or trend, but video game must also be an art, yo shouldn't treating the gamers/customers like milk cows .
-The fact that with the popularity of those games, is that the others companies are lowering the difficulty of their games with auto regeneration and more guided objectives, it's treating the gamer like an idiot. Seriously i saw a few reviews of young guys playing Half Life in 2012, they complain because it's too hard to find his way in the game. Come on i finished the game when i was a kid and it was challenging but not impossible, well today for the average gamer it is...

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

old games are old games now the most hardcore games become casual games.Yes the company try to milk us but you will see when the change will become and all the haters will stay haters

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 11 years ago by twitchAssassino.