They should take example of Valve, release a random game at a random time, never the one you really wanted at first
Comment has been collapsed.
i have cod mw3,bo2,bf3+premium ,medal of honor warfighter,cs:go and i think different game different style , doesnt mean it was bad , some people that doesnt like the game then why hard saying its bad ? that mean you care about it , and if you hear someone scream at cod , didnt you see a mute button in there ? you can mute him why so hard complaint
Comment has been collapsed.
bf3 not > cod and cod not > bf3.Different games stop critisize these two games.If you try to categorize these two games alone and withought what developers sais you will see cod is action fps and bf3 is action,fps,simulator,mmo{only in pc}{planes and other vehicles}
Comment has been collapsed.
why can't you accept that some people don't like it, some people think xcom is a piece of shit even though I love it, you don't see a million "why u no like xcom?" threads
Comment has been collapsed.
because there is no xcom relases every year, because xcom doesnt costs 50€ with some amazing 25% drop price deals once a while (very rarely), because not much kids plays xcom, because there is no much xcom haters, because xcom fans and xcom haters wouldnt waste their time talking about it. i guess thats all
Comment has been collapsed.
why but cod gives you 25% drop price and two free weekend of mp every year for the released game
Comment has been collapsed.
I do hate black ops 2, they pretty much tried too hard ro make it cool and wound up makin a shit game. Multiplay is too similar to battlefield 3, and the maps suck ass, its a 12 year old kids dream, to be able to camp at EVERY single corner of the game. Maps are poorly designed, and the campaign so far has been pretty bad. I do like COD, story aside the multiplay is good as long as you got friends who are playin it, by yourself isnt not much fun. Im severely dissapointed that multiplay is so terrible and broken. I wont play it anymore its just a terrible buy unless your 12 years old whos balls havent dropped.
Comment has been collapsed.
Actually Black Ops 2 is the first game where you cannot camp. They've reworked the Ghost perk so that you don't unlock it until you reach level 55 (max level). In addition, the perk only grants invisibility from UAV's when you're moving, thus eliminating campers.
Comment has been collapsed.
Because people born in early 90's are intelligent people
People or should I say mostly kids who buy those games are always hyped for the first 2-3 weeks of the game's release, then they get bored suddenly - but yet they still continue to buy this.
Comment has been collapsed.
omg the same comments over and over again.Now i feel i must speak.How you play some games with graphics 17 years old ? I will reply for you because you like playing this game.Cod could be more expensive than other shooters but it listen his community and try to improve in gameplay and this shit only counts NO GRAPHICS!!!!!!!.If i didnt make you believe thing about why you buy minecraft
Comment has been collapsed.
think about this "They have remove martydom,last stand,commando,infinity sprint" and who asked this you,me others who play cod every year.A fps to be good must be FUN, must not try to cover its bugs behind a graphic engine and have a good cheat detection.I thing the two first cod achieved them the third one is something that the best fps game cannot achieve because of the developers who leave holes for cheating in order to make money from cheats and hacks.Ah and about his GUI and texture upgrade the cod is one game not two and there is no time to upgrade engine.EA has two games bf and Medal of Honor because the one give time to develop at the other.Something that not happen at cod and for this reason cod stay graphically the same
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm playing through the BO2 campaign right now, it blows. I mean it really blows.
Wait.. sorry, let me elaborate. The missions that take place in the future are fun, the missions that take place in the past suck. I'm not really sure why, they just all really suck.
Comment has been collapsed.
I much rather prefer the Modern Warfare campaign. In the Black Ops series the focus is on the personal issues of the characters, they don't really put much emphasis on the "events" that happen in the game. In Modern Warfare they emphasise major events and let the characters develop without smothering the player with personal information about them.
This is why Black Ops 2 (while better than Black Ops), still had a lack luster campaign for me as well :/ It's hard to compete with the Modern Warfare story.
Comment has been collapsed.
and well if you had borrow it it has and one of the best mp in cod history
Comment has been collapsed.
Black Ops 2 is a really good game and those people who complain about it are just... just... some battlefield crazy fans that don't know anything, just to say cod sucks. Maybe there are some people that really have a good point or an opinion why they don't like this series, but must of all are just saying: "it's the same game". And for those pleople, if you would mind to try this f**ing game before saying it sucks you would see that Treyarch finally realesed a good cod( black ops 1 was pretty good too). I admit that mw3 was sht because was a copy of mw2, but you guys shouldn't be so scumbags with bo2 just because that.
Edit: Haters gona hate.
Comment has been collapsed.
People are hating on Angry 12 year old simulator 2, I thought that was illegal to do.
Comment has been collapsed.
I hate CoD because it got unbalanced random gameplay, and the people who play it abuse all the of the unbalanced stuff.
Also I hate it because its pretty much the same game since 2007 with minor changes and they charge without any shame 60 bucks every year.
Oh I also forgot how they made the new market price for new games 60 bucks for the PC because of "console tax" back in the day when MW2 just came out, and everybody else copied them and began charging 60 bucks for games for the PC, before that bullshit new games used to cost 50 bucks MAX.
Also not to mention the goddamn 2 maps for freaking 15 bucks "DLC"s, when in CoD4 new maps were free, same with Battlefield 2 where some expansions/dlcs were free and the others who changed the game in a big way cost about 10 bucks I think.
Comment has been collapsed.
A lot of it is just flavor of the month, you know. It just came out and people like to complain about stuff. But other than that, its just been basically the same thing released each year; i'll give treyarch the benefit of the doubt that they change stuff alot more than IW but even then they still kinda all blend together. But like I said, most people just like to beat a dead horse.
Comment has been collapsed.
The reason is because COD got Boring after modern warfare because every COD game is exactly the same , I do not deny that Ive had a few hours of fun playing some of them but its not like Battlefield which is timeless and requires strategy also the amount of kids playing COD ruin the fun cos you kill them once and then they spamming "HACKER he killed me so he must be a hacker" .... Kids these days ....
Comment has been collapsed.
Because they see one guy saying it's a ripoff and shit and every year the same bullshit and think he is right and don't have an own opinion.
The game itself is pretty damn good, the best after CoD 4 honestly. The PC Version is also fairly well made. It's a game for casual players, you can't really talk about skill in this game as this is not supposed to be CS or something like that. Sure you can say there's a new CoD every year, but so there is a new BF every year, and so are Indie games, though under a different name and different suit, but the type of indie games are often the same. And who the hell forces you to buy CoD every year? It only comes with a few new gadgets and new skins every year, so this might be sad but the game itself is still good.
Comment has been collapsed.
i could buy it if wanted too, but im not interested, im keeping my money for borderlands 2 and dishonored
Comment has been collapsed.
I only started playing MW3 and didnt even play mw3 so maybe im just biased, i thought thme mw3 campaign was good, and the multiplay is way the hell better than bo2. bo2 reminds me way too much of bf3. My opinion is bo2 is terrible, gfx are the same as mw3, and multiplay is horrid. And by camping the maps i mean that at every single corner of the game there is a barrel or a crate or something to stand behind so only a part of their body is exposed, mainly the head and the gun. Theres no skill involved. theres no open battlefields, just jumping from cover to cover. Should add maps with less cover amd maybe a little bigger, they are really tiny maps. And yes, haters gonna hate. Im just dissapointed it wasnt what it was hyped to be.
Comment has been collapsed.
259 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by Wok
8 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Sachys
83 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by zfazek
39 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Chris76de
14 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by sensualshakti
179 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by ashtwo
380 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by CelestialFrog
69 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by FateOfOne
9,786 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by ayuinaba
121 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Tewam
28 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by amcat
17,038 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by MjrPITA
50 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by rUUk
99 Comments - Last post 50 minutes ago by quijote3000
Why? I enjoyed the Campaing pretty much and the Multiplayer was better than BO1 and MW3
Comment has been collapsed.