I look and read everything before I vote and if it looks decent enough I vote yes. No amount of mere freebies is going to convince me to vote yes for a crappy game.
Greenlight isn't a bad idea, it just needs better oversight.
Comment has been collapsed.
I always watch the trailer first, and if I don't like what I saw I just leave without voting(or reserving the game). I have only voted down games that looked awful, and that only happened 3 or 4 times.
I generally don't mind if mediocre games get into steam, after all it is not like I'm forced to buy them.
Comment has been collapsed.
as much as I may sound unpopular, this is honestly just another one of those oh yea, dont vote on games I dont think are good
Look, sure, dont vote on crappy games. But what if some people genuinely like the concept or upvote those for the lolz?
I still have the feeling that people missed the whole point of gl: letting people self deciding which project they consider worthy to be on steam. Getting into the same old "buying votes with keys" is not really something that would turn things anywhere
Also may I kindly remind everyone that contrary to popular belief, many crappy gl game got through purely because of the hype and not because of "bribery"
Comment has been collapsed.
The reason why the haven't changed it already is because thinking of a suitable replacement isn't as easy as people think.
That and people are against bad games making it to steam due to the bad rep they give to to the indie game industry.
Comment has been collapsed.
'Do we really need another "Day One: Garry's Incident" or "Guise of the Wolf" on steam?'
Who cares? Vote --> get free key --> if game is bad leave bad review.
If all comments below game in steam are red - people will avoid it and it will die slowly anyway :)
(i hope that the last sentence wasn't too "engrish")
Comment has been collapsed.
Steam itself needs quality control. From Watch Dogs to crappy no-one-heard-of greenlight publishers. Look at current steamstore library. Most of games are 2012 or later. And most of the crap is published on steam at 2012 or later. At the same time there are lots of underdogs not getting deserved attention just because they're not present on largest digital distribution channel.
Comment has been collapsed.
Wile Crap games filling up a search or a list of new games will annoy me, I don't have to spend my money on them. I will nearly always vote no on a game that is not for my platform, because I will never be able to play it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Valve should just remove greenlight and allow anyone to sell their games via in-page widget, like the one humble bundle used when I pre-ordered Grimlock from the developers website. They should make sure there is a game and a developer behind it, to avoid scams, and allow for credits return if the game can not be started for any reason... everything else - read/view the reviews before purchasing.
Comment has been collapsed.
Considering the number of free games I got from such promotions, I have nothing against it. Of course, if the game looks like absolute crap I will still downvote it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Gurumin, which was also a "Vote Yes Game" has just been greenlit and I can't wait to play it ^^
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh really? There hasn't been a update on what's been greenlit or not, but it wasn't the free game that got my vote, but the fact it's an action game by Falcom (there was also a bit of pity towards Mastiff who never exactly recovered after the La Pucelle debacle)
If I wanted free Gurumin that badly, I'd go download the PSP verison.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's our business to vote or not, I don't need a person who'll tell me what to do and what not to do
Comment has been collapsed.
IMHO if a dev puts their game on Greenlight and want to go the "vote, get free key" route, they should need to get permission from Steam staff (or whoever is responsible for the whole Greenlight thingy).
That is, of course, easier said than done.
Me, I always check the game and if I like it, I vote YES. If not, I vote "No, thanks".
Should be a common sense, but people tend to go crazy if they sense the opportunity to get something for free...
Comment has been collapsed.
1,911 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MeguminShiro
8,590 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Wolveruno
9 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Sh4dowKill
16,367 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by steveywonder75
214 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by paco7533
343 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Zepy
373 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Marius11
3 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by antidaz
1,540 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Mayanaise
550 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by hfxx
90 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by antidaz
4 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Kyog
71 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by Vampus
393 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by Sebbern
To be honest, I think threads like this should be banned along with steam making this against their rules.
Do we really need another "Day One: Garry's Incident" or "Guise of the Wolf" on steam?
Remember to judge games on greenlight not only by concept but whether they have already achieved the concept or are capable of achieving it.
The debate whether steam needs to have some kind of quality control has points on both sides but having a game greenlite just because it's giving free keys to people who vote for the game is complete nonsense and just defeats greenlight's concept completely.
What are your thoughts on this?
Comment has been collapsed.