Is she good reviewer?
Why does it matter so much to you? If you don't like a review, downvote and move on. Don't go around trying to rally people into downvoting other people's stuff just because you don't like her/her reviews - that's a much worse action than posting bad reviews in my opinion.
Comment has been collapsed.
still optimistic than this person :lol:
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198094803808/recommended/?p=6
Comment has been collapsed.
I actually really question your motive you make this post also I question my motive to actually answer it
And frankly.... I personally just ignore steam reviews if the game has a demo and if there isnt one.. well check top 2-3 negative reviews and if nothing good appears(as in quality of the review) move to the community hub and hope for the best.
Comment has been collapsed.
I guess some people just want an achievement on number of reviews posted?
Although I do agree that she is a bad review, I guess we should let her have her fun (at least her reviews are badly rated so nobody would refer to that for useful info)
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm not sure what the problem is? If you don't like the reviewer, you read another one. That's the beauty of steam reviews, you're not limited to 1 bad reviewer, you're getting a bunch of bad ones to choose from. Also, kinda creepy to fixate so much on someone :p
Comment has been collapsed.
I occasionally run across somebody who leaves short negative reviews saying something like "gave me a virus" or "destroyed my gpu" or "destroyed my cpu" or "crashed my harddrive". Things like that. It gets your attention and might put me off on buying a game if I'm on the fence, but then if you look at their review history and find out every almost single review they leave is a negative variation of the above. I guess they're famous now.
Comment has been collapsed.
Judging by the similar 2 hour time for most games and the lack of achievements even on games designed to instantly give out achievements, I don't think she's actually played most of the games she's reviewed - just idles them for cards then writes a review based on other reviews such as the OP's. Perhaps it's just a weird hobby, though she could be intentionally using it as a way of directing traffic to her profile, which in turn promotes her graphic/photography work and the site in her name - awkwardly, this topic is also potentially contributing to that too.
Comment has been collapsed.
I did notice her low play times for the "first" couple of pages. She probably buys a bunch of bundles to idle the cards from.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes, yes! Someone noticed her short timing for most games. I really saw some silly games to be recommended...
I noticed that two devs commented on her review - one positive (they were happy) and one negative, where dev mentioned she doesn't even have achievements :p
Damn. I didn't want to "promote her". I guess my topic is two-sided blade :(
Comment has been collapsed.
People are required to argue their votes, but not everyone is likely or wants to or care to post pro reviews.
Also, that is a kind of stalking, what if she's reading this forum ?
Comment has been collapsed.
I agree. They don't have any influence whatsoever if I purchase a game or not. Well, unless they all say a game is broken. :)
Comment has been collapsed.
I find it funny that some people seem to be upset that you're upset at this person's reviews. Though, I think going through the trouble to down vote all their reviews is a bit much.
Regardless, their reviews aren't that bad. They're not too helpful, and if I ever bothered to read any for games I had a slight interest in I would vote them down for that reason. At the same time, that user chose to make a list of somewhat vague reasons why they were for or against a game, so that's something. For some people, deciding on whether they want a game or not boils down to the very reasons that user listed.
As it stands, their reviews will likely continue to get voted down because they consist of a vague, somewhat opinionated list.
Things like "it is a good indie" is extremely vague.
Comment has been collapsed.
For being a Steam reviewer I actually think she isn't that bad. The only thing I would comment on is that some of her points seem a bit forced like you kinda say and that she seems to have a quota of points to make which makes her do this. If it's a positive review she only mentions positive points and vice versa for a negative review, so they aren't nuanced at all.
Personally, I like to read the reviews of games, and I especially enjoy the "story time" reviews that go into great dramatic detail and end with a simple conclusion like "10/10, would kill my friend again". Funny reviews are all good in my book, and there is a funny button for a reason.
Comment has been collapsed.
Bad? Yes.
Worst? Not by a long shot.
We have people who plagiarise reviews, people who only post meme reviews, people who only post "0/10" and "10/10" reviews only, people who post ASCII art as reviews, people who use the same generic review for any game where the developer pays an average of 50 cents or so…
Someone who uses a super simplified template and changes one-two lines here and there based on the game is probably not even cracking the top 1000 in case of worst reviewers. (Heck, I am using a template for my reviews…)
Heck, I might even argue that if she actually polished this format quite some more, it could be actually super helpful for a lot of indie games. There are a few reviewers who use list-based reviews and get straight to the point in few words, but generally try to make it more precise and game-specific.
Comment has been collapsed.
It seems she idles about 95% of games, including recommended ones.
That's senseless to recommend game, she won't play herself?
Only valid point would be - you don't like genre, etc. but quality of game is so high, it would be shame to downvote.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, a review without any kind of first hand experience of playing the game is pointless. She's just idling the games (possibly for the card drops), and doesn't have any achievements for them. The template can work as long as its your own opinion about the game, but it seems that she's skimming other reviews and simplifying them into a few words. Not really plagiarizing, but it's clear she hasn't played most (if not all) of the games she's reviewed..
Comment has been collapsed.
She is not the worst reviewer I have ever seen, believe me. ^^
Comment has been collapsed.
If she doesnt get games for free to review them "professionally" then I dont think we have a problem.
If she thinks shes so good, let her live in her little bubble.
We start to have a problem, when someone starts to do something for money (or in this case - for free games) and they slack off. Copy and write generic ass reviews that dont really mean anything.
Its like those idiot journalists. Writing some generic top 10s just for the sake of writing something. Or copying anything others have written, because they are too unprofessional to write themselfs.
But in this case it`s more or less like twitter. Write whatever the fuck you want - no one really gives a fuck anyway.
Comment has been collapsed.
I honestly don't think there's anything wrong with those reviews. They're short but still show you exactly what they think.
Let's take closer look on bits from her reviews:
Everything you say here is very nitpicky. The same things can be said about basically all decent reviews on Steam...
And right now, I'm downvoting all her reviews
That's just sad...
Comment has been collapsed.
Believe it or nor, that's exactly the person I immediately thought of when I read the title of this thread. Always annoying to see their bullshit "reviews" all over the place. Wish there was a script to let me auto-downvote all of them, cause there's no way I'm spending the time to do it manually.
Not as bad, but very annoying for me personally is the asshole who puts this on all their reviews:
Tags: [whatever]
Additional Tags: Delete Local Content & Remove from Library
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh yeah. I have seen that one recently, too. But only on shitty games.
So generally, copying any information from steam store seems bad... like why saying release date (if it doesn't differ), developer, publisher, genres, if we already see it on Store page, right?
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
23 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by Seibitsu
193 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by Seibitsu
64 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by Bloodfall
16,526 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by rayyyy91
15 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by RePlayBe
56 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by FranckCastle
13 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by SolvedPack
8,370 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by MagnificentOne
3,597 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by masterbubu87
7 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Lugum
13 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by xarabas
954 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Codric
29,149 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MrSick
1 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by GeoSol
You can find gifts here.
I was considering making thread about her...
You might know her or recognize for her reviews on many Steam products...
Examples: http://steamcommunity.com/id/yella0109/recommended
Reviews which are basically copy-paste. When I told her that (via comment), she blocked communication.
And right now, I'm downvoting all her reviews, because I'm stupid bastard.
And I saw this: http://steamcommunity.com/id/yella0109/recommended/587590/
Which feels somehow similar to mine review: http://steamcommunity.com/id/Beridok/recommended/587590
And the worst part about that is sometimes people copy her review as their own.
What do you think about her reviews?
For me it's basically bullshit. Let's take closer look on bits from her reviews:
PS: I really am overreactiiiiiiiiiiing.
No GA. You clicked here for nothing.
Edit: Thanks for all comments. I feel much better now, that I let it out loud.
I got so mad, that I clearly didn't write the thread properly making some people misinterpret some sentences.
I am curious how many blacklists I'll get.
Comment has been collapsed.