there could be a collection thing if that were implemented... so u would need to submit say all your 300 points and wait for another 200 before entering (obviously the time for the giveaway needs to be appropriately made/placed)... if the giveaway ends before u can submit the rest of the points u get those points refunded automatically... of course this would mean that u might potentially have more than 300 points when this happens but this would mean it would take less time for you to collect points for another such giveaway for 500 pts ^^
Comment has been collapsed.
max points is 300
If you set it to 301, no one can enter
And everybody gets free points
Comment has been collapsed.
The giveaways can generate the same amount of points they do now, but the entry fee will be selected by the creator of the giveaway and it can be anywhere from the normal price it has now up to 300.
So, for example a 10 dollar game would generate 0.25/0.5 points (whatever it generates now) but it could cost 300 points to enter.
Comment has been collapsed.
Implement a minimum and maximum entry cost of 1 and 300. SO HARD.
Comment has been collapsed.
Why? I don't see the problem with creating giveaways with lower point cost entries than what they normally would be, provided that the 5% of points earnt scales down with that.
Comment has been collapsed.
So in other words, there's no reason other than crying about people getting games with their virtual credits cheaper than they normally would. Nice to know.
Comment has been collapsed.
there are currently 37,600 members atm. It doesn't matter what you do you will not increase your odds of winning games (maybe increase odds of winning a particular raffle but you enter for that game less often so its still the same odds). I think with this idea you will simply find that 5% points is not enough as you will only be able to enter 1 game a day if that. It will cause the site to be less active because no one has enough points to find a reason to log on and browse games. I know i wouldn't get on more than once a week.
That being said, this is the best idea i have read about making an adjustment on the points system. it adds a lil more fun to picking which game you enter because you can play the odds a little. Might work if the max was set at double the price. of the game. (300points for a $1 game is over the top). I still don't think I approve though.
Comment has been collapsed.
224 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by sosich
16,560 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Kenruyoh
30 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by alberto64674yt
1,254 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by Hogan09890
112 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by JMM72
14 Comments - Last post 16 hours ago by Akylen
47,280 Comments - Last post 17 hours ago by Wolterhon
24 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by PastelLicuado
59 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by meneldur
234 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by Vampus
62 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by BarbaricGenie
9,804 Comments - Last post 50 minutes ago by CurryKingWurst
29,200 Comments - Last post 53 minutes ago by Lakraj1209
79 Comments - Last post 56 minutes ago by BusinessMonkey
The points you get would still be calculated as they are now, but you could collect more and also create giveaways which need more points.
So, for example, I make a Skyrim raffle for 500P.
Only people who really want it would collect and enter, while it creates greater chances for people to win 5 dollar games (which get up to 2000 entries now)
Thoughts?
Comment has been collapsed.