there could be a collection thing if that were implemented... so u would need to submit say all your 300 points and wait for another 200 before entering (obviously the time for the giveaway needs to be appropriately made/placed)... if the giveaway ends before u can submit the rest of the points u get those points refunded automatically... of course this would mean that u might potentially have more than 300 points when this happens but this would mean it would take less time for you to collect points for another such giveaway for 500 pts ^^
Comment has been collapsed.
max points is 300
If you set it to 301, no one can enter
And everybody gets free points
Comment has been collapsed.
The giveaways can generate the same amount of points they do now, but the entry fee will be selected by the creator of the giveaway and it can be anywhere from the normal price it has now up to 300.
So, for example a 10 dollar game would generate 0.25/0.5 points (whatever it generates now) but it could cost 300 points to enter.
Comment has been collapsed.
Implement a minimum and maximum entry cost of 1 and 300. SO HARD.
Comment has been collapsed.
Why? I don't see the problem with creating giveaways with lower point cost entries than what they normally would be, provided that the 5% of points earnt scales down with that.
Comment has been collapsed.
So in other words, there's no reason other than crying about people getting games with their virtual credits cheaper than they normally would. Nice to know.
Comment has been collapsed.
there are currently 37,600 members atm. It doesn't matter what you do you will not increase your odds of winning games (maybe increase odds of winning a particular raffle but you enter for that game less often so its still the same odds). I think with this idea you will simply find that 5% points is not enough as you will only be able to enter 1 game a day if that. It will cause the site to be less active because no one has enough points to find a reason to log on and browse games. I know i wouldn't get on more than once a week.
That being said, this is the best idea i have read about making an adjustment on the points system. it adds a lil more fun to picking which game you enter because you can play the odds a little. Might work if the max was set at double the price. of the game. (300points for a $1 game is over the top). I still don't think I approve though.
Comment has been collapsed.
20 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by InSpec
71 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Reidor
7 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by sensualshakti
1,775 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Shanti
28 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by DiabLXIX
52 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by BlazeHaze
24 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Fluffster
1 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Calibr3
37 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by yugimax
717 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by CelticBatman
434 Comments - Last post 57 minutes ago by Heitor112
1,578 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by Pyrocious
3,362 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by pizurk
104 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by eeev
The points you get would still be calculated as they are now, but you could collect more and also create giveaways which need more points.
So, for example, I make a Skyrim raffle for 500P.
Only people who really want it would collect and enter, while it creates greater chances for people to win 5 dollar games (which get up to 2000 entries now)
Thoughts?
Comment has been collapsed.